Download pdf
How Does Language Influence Our Minds? From a Linguistics Perspective
- 1 Dougherty Valley High School
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, which was first proposed by linguists Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the early 20th century, is currently the most widely accepted theory of neurolinguistics. It makes the argument that language influences cognition and perception, i.e., that people's basic worldviews vary depending on the language they use. Their hypothesis, sometimes referred to as "linguistic relativity," contends that a language's lexicon and structure affect perception. This claim has been disputed on a number of different grounds.Specifically, the hypothesis is composed of two different parts called “Linguistic Diversity” and “Linguistic Influence on Thought,” which argue that languages have fundamental differences from each other and that the differences between individual languages create cognitive differences within people. With regards to the latter cognitive section of the theory, there are two key tiers that it is divided into. The first tier proposes a universal "rock bottom" of human consciousness, where everyone must share a basic level of perception. The second tier delves into the semantic details of various languages, asserting that these linguistic nuances contribute to different interpretations layered atop the universal foundation. Moreover, the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis has been even further bisected into two distinct versions depending on how strongly they convey the idea of linguistic relativity, with a strong version arguing that native language completely alters our perspective and a weak version that only suggests a weak connection between the two.
Keywords
Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, Linguistic relativity, Linguistics
[1]. Baghramian, Maria and J. Adam Carter, "Relativism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/relativism/>.
[2]. Regier, T., & Xu, Y. (2017). The Sapir‐Whorf hypothesis and inference under uncertainty. WIREs Cognitive Science, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1440
[3]. Regier, T., & Kay, P. (2009). Language, thought, and color: Whorf was half right. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(10), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.07.001
[4]. Szabó, Zoltán Gendler, "Compositionality", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/compositionality/>.
[5]. Bierwisch. (2001). Bloomfield, Léonard (1887–1949). ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B0080430767002187
[6]. Percival, K. (1966). A Reconsideration of Whorf’s Hypothesis. Anthropological Linguistics, 8(8), 1–12. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30029443
[7]. Poeppel, D. (2017, July 13). The Influence of Chomsky on the neuroscience of language (chapter 7) - The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky. Cambridge Core. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-chomsky/influence-of-chomsky-on-the-neuroscience-of-language/5ACE5B59DDFB6AB0425E0EB0CE632DA8
[8]. Scholz, Barbara C., Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Geoffrey K. Pullum, and Ryan Nefdt, "Philosophy of Linguistics", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/linguistics/>.
[9]. Rescorla, Michael, "The Language of Thought Hypothesis", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), forthcoming URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/language-thought/>.
[10]. Menn, L. (n.d.). Neurolinguistics. Linguistic Society of America. Retrieved December 6, 2023, from https://www.linguisticsociety.org/resource/neurolinguistics
[11]. Frank C. K. (2010). Linguistic effects on the neural basis of theory of mind. The open neuroimaging journal, 4, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874440001004020037
[12]. Currie, I. D. (1966). THE SAPIR-WHORF HYPOTHESIS: A PROBLEM IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 11, 14–31. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42889010
Cite this article
Mei,A.L. (2024). How Does Language Influence Our Minds? From a Linguistics Perspective. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,42,205-209.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Psychology and Humanity Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).