References
[1]. Blocher, Joseph, and Bardia Vaseghi. “True Threats, Self-Defense, and the Second Amendment.” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, vol. 48, no. S4, 2020, pp. 112–118, https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110520979409.
[2]. Born, Gary. International Arbitration: Law and Practice. Second ed., 2016.
[3]. Solomon, Solon. “Broadening International Criminal Jurisdiction?” International Human Rights Law Review, vol. 4, no. 1, 2015, pp. 53–80.
[4]. Ruxin Chen. On Jurisdictional Challenges in International Commercial Arbitration. 2008. Dalian Maritime University, MA thesis.
[5]. The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China), https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/7/, visited on 25 July 2023.
[6]. China’s deceleration, Declaration and Reservations, UN, dated 25th August 2006, see https://treaties.un.org/Pages/Declarations.aspx?index=China&lang=-en&chapter=21&treaty=463, visited on 25 July 2023.
[7]. Rishik, Parth, and Malvika Sharma. “Arbitration under UNCLOS: An Analysis of Arbitration in Law of the Sea.” International Journal of Law Management & Humanities, 5, 2022, pp.1423-[cxxiv].
[8]. Liu, Heng. "Review of Literature on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of the South China Sea Arbitration." China Oceans Law Review, vol. 2021, no. 4, 2021, pp. 20-46.
[9]. Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration (Mauritius v. United Kingdom), https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/11/, visited on 25 July 2023.
[10]. Nguyen, Lan Ngoc. “The Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration: Has the Scope of LOSC Compulsory Jurisdiction Been Clarified.” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, vol. 31, no. 1, 2016, pp. 120-144.
[11]. Dispute Concerning Coastal State Rights in the Black Sea, Sea of Azov, and Kerch Strait (Ukraine v. the Russian Federation), https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/149/, visited on 25 July 2023.
[12]. Volterra, Robert G., et al. “Ukraine/Russian Federation: The Characterisation of the Dispute concerning Coastal State Rights in the Black Sea, Sea of Azov, and Kerch Strait.” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, vol.33, no.3, 2018, pp. 614-622.
[13]. For instance, North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands), Judgment, I. CJ Reports 1969, P. 3, at paragraph 96; Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (n 7), at paragraph 77.
[14]. In the Matter of an Arbitration under the Arbitration Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Croatia and the Government of the Republic of Slovenia, Signed on 4 November 2009, PCA Case No.2012-04, Partial Award, 30 June 2016.
[15]. Prosecutor V. Dusko Tadic A/K/A Dule," ICTY Case No.IT-94-1-AR72, Appeals Chamber, Decision of 2 0ctober 1995, para.18.
[16]. Lijiang Zhu. “Termination of Validity of International Arbitration Agreements - An Analysis of the Arbitration Case on the Territorial Sea Dispute between Slovenia and Croatia” Boundary and Ocean Studies 2.02(2017):32-42.
[17]. Trindade, Antonio Augusto Cancado. "Reflections on a Century of International Justice; Developments, Current State and Perspectives." Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 68, 2016, pp.115-154.
[18]. Talmon, Stefan. “The Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration: Expansion of the Jurisdiction of Unclos Part XV Courts and Tribunals.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 65, no. 4, 2016, pp. 927–951.
[19]. Ec in “about in the Pacific Ocean southeast of conservation and sustainable fishing fish” case, as responses to the defendant, reflects the international organizations in the international tribunal for the litigation status, https://news.un.org/en/story/2005/12/164942, visited on 25 June, 2023.
[20]. Xuexia Liao. “Expansion ratione materiae of the jurisdiction of tribunals and arbitral tribunals under ITLOS.” Global Law Review 44.06(2022):171-186.
Cite this article
Li,X. (2024). Role of International Arbitration in Resolving International Disputes and Analysis of Examples. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,44,90-96.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Blocher, Joseph, and Bardia Vaseghi. “True Threats, Self-Defense, and the Second Amendment.” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, vol. 48, no. S4, 2020, pp. 112–118, https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110520979409.
[2]. Born, Gary. International Arbitration: Law and Practice. Second ed., 2016.
[3]. Solomon, Solon. “Broadening International Criminal Jurisdiction?” International Human Rights Law Review, vol. 4, no. 1, 2015, pp. 53–80.
[4]. Ruxin Chen. On Jurisdictional Challenges in International Commercial Arbitration. 2008. Dalian Maritime University, MA thesis.
[5]. The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China), https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/7/, visited on 25 July 2023.
[6]. China’s deceleration, Declaration and Reservations, UN, dated 25th August 2006, see https://treaties.un.org/Pages/Declarations.aspx?index=China&lang=-en&chapter=21&treaty=463, visited on 25 July 2023.
[7]. Rishik, Parth, and Malvika Sharma. “Arbitration under UNCLOS: An Analysis of Arbitration in Law of the Sea.” International Journal of Law Management & Humanities, 5, 2022, pp.1423-[cxxiv].
[8]. Liu, Heng. "Review of Literature on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of the South China Sea Arbitration." China Oceans Law Review, vol. 2021, no. 4, 2021, pp. 20-46.
[9]. Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration (Mauritius v. United Kingdom), https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/11/, visited on 25 July 2023.
[10]. Nguyen, Lan Ngoc. “The Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration: Has the Scope of LOSC Compulsory Jurisdiction Been Clarified.” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, vol. 31, no. 1, 2016, pp. 120-144.
[11]. Dispute Concerning Coastal State Rights in the Black Sea, Sea of Azov, and Kerch Strait (Ukraine v. the Russian Federation), https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/149/, visited on 25 July 2023.
[12]. Volterra, Robert G., et al. “Ukraine/Russian Federation: The Characterisation of the Dispute concerning Coastal State Rights in the Black Sea, Sea of Azov, and Kerch Strait.” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, vol.33, no.3, 2018, pp. 614-622.
[13]. For instance, North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands), Judgment, I. CJ Reports 1969, P. 3, at paragraph 96; Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (n 7), at paragraph 77.
[14]. In the Matter of an Arbitration under the Arbitration Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Croatia and the Government of the Republic of Slovenia, Signed on 4 November 2009, PCA Case No.2012-04, Partial Award, 30 June 2016.
[15]. Prosecutor V. Dusko Tadic A/K/A Dule," ICTY Case No.IT-94-1-AR72, Appeals Chamber, Decision of 2 0ctober 1995, para.18.
[16]. Lijiang Zhu. “Termination of Validity of International Arbitration Agreements - An Analysis of the Arbitration Case on the Territorial Sea Dispute between Slovenia and Croatia” Boundary and Ocean Studies 2.02(2017):32-42.
[17]. Trindade, Antonio Augusto Cancado. "Reflections on a Century of International Justice; Developments, Current State and Perspectives." Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 68, 2016, pp.115-154.
[18]. Talmon, Stefan. “The Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration: Expansion of the Jurisdiction of Unclos Part XV Courts and Tribunals.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 65, no. 4, 2016, pp. 927–951.
[19]. Ec in “about in the Pacific Ocean southeast of conservation and sustainable fishing fish” case, as responses to the defendant, reflects the international organizations in the international tribunal for the litigation status, https://news.un.org/en/story/2005/12/164942, visited on 25 June, 2023.
[20]. Xuexia Liao. “Expansion ratione materiae of the jurisdiction of tribunals and arbitral tribunals under ITLOS.” Global Law Review 44.06(2022):171-186.