
Framed or Freedom? Emotional Discourse of Individuals to the Overturned of Roe V. Wade
- 1 International School of MERCHISTON SHENZHEN
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The Roe V. Wade case has long been a noteworthy issue in the United States. According to research Basel 2022, approximately 504, 803 tweets have been filtered based on terms related to abortion. By collecting information and posts on Twitter, this study hopes to demonstrate how attitudes have changed in response to the adoption of abortion regulations. It’s interesting to learn how the attitudes of various local residents toward this new law relate to one another. Sentiment analysis is applied to 200 postings with typical features in order to accomplish this goal. In order to complete and build a more distinct future trend, data are compared and evaluated with historical abstracts. The findings imply that people have a moderate tendency to take an optimistic perspective. Having stated that, this conclusion offers a projection of potential human behavior and the underlying rationale determining various perceptions. This study also seeks to understand the social repercussions and intimate relationship between abortion and conception. Which introduces feminism, gender equality, teen problems, and self-induced abortion by addressing potential results and possible conflicts. To sum up, this study uses emotional analysis and additional academic approaches to investigate the relationship between various demographic, and socioeconomic groups and their attitudes beforehand and following Roe v. Wade. Understanding how people feel is of utmost importance as abortion continues to be discussed incessantly online.
Keywords
Abortion, Roe V. Wade, Pro-life, Equality, Childbirth
[1]. State policy trends at midyear 2022: With Roe about to be overturned, some states double down on abortion restrictions. (2023, July 18). Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2022/06/state-policy-trends-midyear-2022-roe-about-be-overturned-some-states-double-down
[2]. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220927005128/en/Now-More-Than-Ever-Americans-Are-Open-To-Exploring-Their-Sexuality-Hims-Hers’-Nationwide-Survey-Uncovers-The-Realities-Of-Sex-In-America-Today
[3]. ERLC. (2023, September 8). The demographics of abortion in America - ERLC. https://erlc.com/resource-library/articles/the-demographics-of-abortion-in-america/
[4]. Sahagún, L., Finnegan, M., & Wigglesworth, A. (2022, May 14). Thousands expected at abortion rights rallies in California, elsewhere - Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-05-14/thousands-participate-in-womens-abortion-rights-rally-in-downtown-l-a
[5]. Dozier, J. L., Hennink, M., Mosley, E. A., Narasimhan, S., Pringle, J., Clarke, L. S., Blevins, J., James-Portis, L., Keithan, R., Hall, K. S., & Rice, W. S. (2020). Abortion attitudes, religious and moral beliefs, and pastoral care among Protestant religious leaders in Georgia. PLOS ONE, 15(7), e0235971. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235971
[6]. Respect for unborn human life: the Church’s constant teaching. (n.d.). USCCB. https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/abortion/respect-for-unborn-human-life
[7]. Mane, H., Yue, X., Yu, W., Doig, A. C., Wei, H., Delcid, N., Harris, A., Nguyen, T. T., & Nguyen, Q. C. (2022). Examination of the Public’s Reaction on Twitter to the Over-Turning of Roe v Wade and Abortion Bans. Healthcare, 10(12), 2390. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122390
[8]. Chang, R. (2023). #RoeOverturned: Twitter dataset on the abortion rights controversy. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/%23RoeOverturned%3A-Twitter-Dataset-on-the-Abortion-Chang-Rao/87d46c14d766eb5e6bdd718a411c85a60c24df5d
[9]. https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/13/health/abortion-misinformation-social-media/index.html
[10]. Guttmacher Institute Releases 2020 Abortion Provider Census with Important Data on US Abortion Landscape Before the Fall of Roe. (2023, February 8). Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2022/guttmacher-institute-releases-2020-abortion-provider-census-important-data-us
[11]. About Feminism and Abortion Rights Worldwide - safe2choose. (2022, May 5). https://safe2choose.org/blog/abortion-and-feminism
[12]. Valdez, D., & Goodson, P. (2022). Neutral or framed? A sentiment analysis of 2019 abortion laws. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 19(3), 936–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-022-00690-2
Cite this article
Chang,C. (2024). Framed or Freedom? Emotional Discourse of Individuals to the Overturned of Roe V. Wade. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,48,162-170.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).