Analyzing Monarchy and Republicanism in Machiavelli's The Prince: A Corpus-Based Study of Political Representations

Binglin Zhang

doi:10.54254/2753-7048/52/20241543

Research Article

Open access

Published on 13 May 2024

Download pdf

Zhang,B. (2024). Analyzing Monarchy and Republicanism in Machiavelli's The Prince: A Corpus-Based Study of Political Representations. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,52,101-110.

Export citation

Analyzing Monarchy and Republicanism in Machiavelli's The Prince: A Corpus-Based Study of Political Representations

Binglin Zhang *^,1,

¹ Hong Kong Polytechnic University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/52/20241543

Abstract

This research filled a research gap in the utilization of corpus and discourse analysis in The Prince. Niccolò Machiavelli’s paramount treatise, The Prince, persists in generating scholarly discourse and contentious discussions due to its forthright examination of political expediency within the turbulent milieu of Renaissance Italy. Although Machiavelli's impact permeates the discipline of political science, the preponderance of examinations of his oeuvre has been conducted from political and philosophical perspectives, resulting in a dearth of analysis from a linguistic standpoint. Traditional discourse analysis has played a critical role in investigating attitudes, but it tends to focus on a small number of texts only, which leads to concerns from the perspective of statistics. This study aims to use a new prevailing method combining corpus-based research with manual text analysis, to investigate Machiavelli’s attitudes toward Republics, by analyzing his famous work The Prince. An analytical model based on the attitude schema is proposed to explicate the strategies for encoding attitudes. Analysis shows that Machiavelli’s attitudes towards Republicanism are characterized by a series of positive judgments of propriety, creating a positive image of Republicanism, whereas when Republicanism is mentioned, his attitudes are characterized by his favor. It is found that negative attitudes are always expressed implicitly by recounting events that elicit the attitudes (i.e. behaviors of the monarchies or republics) and performing speech acts that are motivated by the attitudes.

Keywords

Machiavelli, political discourse analysis, attitudes, monarchy, republicanism

View pdf

References

[1]. Machiavelli, N. (1998). The Prince: Translated and with an Introduction by Harvey C. Mansfield, ed. HC Mansfield.

[2]. Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2005). The language of evaluation (Vol. 2). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

[3]. Charteris-Black, Jonathan. (2005). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

[4]. Charteris-Black, Jonathan. (2014). Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

[5]. Chilton, Paul. (2004). Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

[6]. Fairclough, Norman. (1998). “Political discourse in the media: an analytical framework.” In Approaches to Media Discourse, ed. by Allan Bell and Peter Garrett, 142–162. Oxford: Blackwell.

[7]. Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis: A method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.

[8]. Van Dijk, Teun A. (1997). “What is political discourse analysis.” In Political Linguistics, ed. by Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen, 11–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

[9]. Wodak, Ruth. (2009). The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233683

[10]. Feng, Dezheng. (2017). “Ideological dissonance among Chinese newspapers in Hong Kong: a corpus-base analysis of attitude towards Occupy Central Movement.” Discourse and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317726928

[11]. Rousseau, J. J. (1964). The social contract (1762). Londres.

[12]. Strauss, L. (2014). Thoughts on Machiavelli. University of Chicago Press.

[13]. Mansfield, H. C. (2001). Machiavelli's new modes and orders: a study of the Discourses on Livy. University of Chicago Press.

[14]. Pocock, J. G. A. (2016). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine political thought and the Atlantic republican tradition (Vol. 25). Princeton University Press.

[15]. Van Dijk, Teun A. (1995). “Ideological discourse analysis.” In New Courant: Special Issue Interdisciplinary Approaches to Discourse Analysis, ed. by Eija Ventola and Anna Solin, 135–161. Helsinki: English Department, University of Helsinki. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250

[16]. White, P. R. (2006). Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse. Mediating ideology in text and image, 37-67.

[17]. Bednarek, M. (2006). Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. A&C Black.

[18]. Benner, E. (2009). Machiavelli's ethics. Princeton University Press.

[19]. Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359-383.

[20]. Viroli, M. (2002). Niccolò's smile: a biography of Machiavelli. Macmillan.

Cite this article

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries

Conference website: https://www.iceipi.org/

ISBN：978-1-83558-411-8(Print) / 978-1-83558-412-5(Online)

Conference date: 12 July 2024

Editor：Mallen Enrique

Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

Volume number: Vol.52

ISSN：2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).