Download pdf
Religion and National Values: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Denmark, Iran, South Korea, and Thailand
- 1 The University of Queensland
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This paper analyses a comparative analysis of the national cultures of Denmark, Iran, South Korea, and Thailand, utilizing Hofstede’s, GLOBE, and World Values Survey (WVS) cultural dimensions. It details how each country's predominant religion—Christianity in Denmark, Islam in Iran, Confucianism in South Korea, and Buddhism in Thailand—influences various cultural metrics such as power distance, individualism, and uncertainty avoidance. Denmark is highlighted for its low power distance and high individualism, indicative of a culture that values equality and individual rights. Iran is depicted as highly collectivistic, emphasizing family and community cohesion. South Korea is described as valuing hierarchical order and community well-being, reflecting its Confucian roots. Thailand is recognized for its high humane orientation and respect for social hierarchies, influenced by Buddhist teachings. The analysis points out the significant implications these cultural dimensions have for international business practices, stressing the need for cultural sensitivity and adaptability in global market strategies.
Keywords
national cultures, Hofstede’s and GLOBE Dimensions, World Values Survey
[1]. Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy oi Management Executive, 7(1), 81-94.
[2]. Beugelsdijk, S., & Welzel, C. (2018). Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede with Inglehart. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(10), 1469-1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118798505
[3]. GLOBE. (2020). An overview of the 2004 study: Understanding the R0065lationship Between National Culture, Societal Effectiveness and Desirable Leadership Attributes. https://globeproject.com/study_2004_2007
[4]. World Values Survey. (ndb). What we do. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp
[5]. Lüchau, P. (2023). Religion, Politics, and Moral in Recent Denmark. In: Kærgård, N. (eds) Market, Ethics and Religion. Ethical Economy, 62. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08462-1_12
[6]. Gundelach, P. (2008). Denmark: Solid or fluid?. In Petterson, T. & Esmer, Y. (Eds), Changing Values, Persisting Cultures: Case Studies in Value Change (pp. 149-173). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004162341.I-390.51
[7]. Kim, Y., & Pettid, M. J. (Eds.). (2011). Women and Confucianism in Choson Korea: New Perspectives. State University of New York Press.
[8]. Keddie, N.R. (1980). Iran: Religion, Politics and Society: Collected Essays (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203043349
[9]. Raymond, G. V. (2020). Religion as a Tool of Influence. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 42(3), 346–371. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs42-3b
[10]. Forsyth, T. (2020). Who shapes the politics of expertise? Co‐production and authoritative knowledge in Thailand’s political forests. Antipode, 52(4), 1039–1059. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12545
[11]. World Values Survey. (nda). Findings and Insights. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp
[12]. OECD. (nd). Better Life Index. https://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/#/11111111111
[13]. Morrison, J. (2020). The Global Business Environment: Toward Sustainability?. Red Globe Press.
[14]. Fox, J. (2019). The Secular-Religious Competition Perspective in Comparative Perspective. Politics and Religion, 12(3), 524–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175504831900018X
[15]. Ghorbani, N., Chen, Z. J., Rabiee, F., & Watson, P. (2019). Religious fundamentalism in Iran.Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 41(2), 73 88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0084672419878832
[16]. Venaik, S. (2016, October 28). Working Paper. National Culture Dimensions in HOFSTEDE: Definitions, Survey Questions, Index Formulae and Scores for 111 Countries/Regions. University of Queensland Business School. Australia.
[17]. Venaik, S. (2016, October 11). Working Paper. National Culture Dimensions in GLOBE: Definitions, Survey Questions, and Practices and Values Scores for 61 Countries. University of Queensland Business School. Australia.
[18]. Venaik, S., & Brewer, P. (2013). Critical issues in the Hofstede and GLOBE national culture models. International Marketing Review, 30(5), 469-482. DOI 10.1108/IMR-03-2013-0058
[19]. Pekerti, A. A., Woodland, S., Diack, S., & Pekerti, A. (2010). Valuing cultures through critical incidents: Analyses of Cross-cultural encounters and their implications for international business behaviors. Journal of International Business Education, 5(1), 43–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526461827
[20]. Openstax. (2019). Hofstede’s Cultural Framework - Principles of Management - OpenStax. Openstax.org. https://openstax.org/books/principles-management/pages/6-2-hofstedes-cultural-framework
[21]. Roffman, N. (2023). The Cultural Impact on International Marketing: Understanding How Different Cultures Influence Advertising Perception and Strategies. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2008&context=honorsprojects
Cite this article
Wu,X. (2024). Religion and National Values: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Denmark, Iran, South Korea, and Thailand. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,56,14-19.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).