
Singapore’s New ‘Hedging’ Strategy in the Post-epidemic Era
- 1 School of Maxism, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Singapore has pursued "pragmatism" in the diplomatic area since its founding. To diplomacy with the great powers, especially vis-à-vis a rising China, Singapore chooses a strategy called 'hedging,' which represents neutrality between pure-power rejection and purepower acceptance. The successful implementation of a hedging strategy depends on certain conditions. In the case of the outbreak of full-scale competition among big countries, hedging will become challenging to sustain. The outbreak of COVID-19 has brought complex changes to the world pattern; at the same time, the rise of China and the intensification of competition between China and the United States also make Singapore's hedging policy must be constantly adjusted with the changes to global change. This paper attempts to analyze the current situation of Singapore's hedging policy from the macro and micro dimensions by sorting out the stage changes of Singapore's hedging policy and exploring the new adjustment of Singapore's China policy in the post-epidemic era.
Keywords
hedging' strategy, post-epidemic era, Singapore
[1]. Goh, Evelyn. Meeting the China challenge: The US in Southeast Asian regional security strategies. Washington, D.C.: East-West Center Washington, 2005.
[2]. Fiori, Antonio, and Andrea Passeri. "Hedging in search of a new age of non-alignment: Myanmar between China and the USA." The Pacific Review 28.5 (2015): 679-702.
[3]. Chung, Chien-peng CP. "Southeast Asia-China Relations: Dialectics of" Hedging" and" Counter-Hedging"." Southeast Asian Affairs 2004.1 (2004): 35-53.
[4]. Cheng-Chwee, Kuik. "The essence of hedging: Malaysia and Singapore's response to a rising China." Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 30.2 (2008): 159-185.
[5]. Kuik, Cheng-Chwee. "How do weaker states hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China." Journal of Contemporary China 25.100 (2016): 500-514.
[6]. Wang, Dong. “Research on hedging behavior in International Relations: Taking Asia Pacific countries as an example.” World economy and Politics 10 (2018): 29-34.
[7]. Cheng-Chwee, Kuik. "The essence of hedging: Malaysia and Singapore's response to a rising China." Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 30.2 (2008): 159-185.
[8]. Wang, Dong. “Research on hedging behavior in International Relations: Taking Asia Pacific countries as an example.” World economy and Politics 10 (2018): 29-34.
[9]. Rose, Gideon. "Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policRose, Gideon. "Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policRose, Gideon. "Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy." World Politics 51.1 (1998): 144-172.y." World Politics 51.1 (1998): 144-172.y." World Politics 51.1 (1998): 144-172.
[10]. Kuik, Cheng-Chwee. "How do weaker states hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China." Journal of Contemporary China 25.100 (2016): 500-514.
[11]. Economic and Commercial Department of the Embassy of the people's Republic of China in the Republic of Singapore: Statistics of bilateral trade volume between China and Singapore over the years, http://sg.Mofcom.gov.cn/article/myzh/sbmy/200310/20031000135869.shtml.
[12]. https://data.aseanstats.org/trade-annually.
[13]. Medeiros, Evan S., et al. Pacific Currents: The Responses of US Allies and Security Partners in East Asia to China's Rise. New York: Rand Corporation, 2008.
[14]. Kuik, Cheng-Chwee. "How do weaker states hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China." Journal of Contemporary China 25.100 (2016): 500-514.
[15]. “Singapore urges respect for court ruling on South China Sea”, Today online. https://wwwtodayonline.com/singapore/singapore-south-china-sea-ruling-reaction Accessed 23 Mar. 2019,
[16]. Tan, Andrew TH. "Singapore’s survival and its China challenge." Security Challenges 13.2 (2017): 11-31.
[17]. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. “Importer / Exporter TIV Tables.” http://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/page/values.php. Accessed 6 Dec. 2022.
[18]. (Dewey Sim, “Singapore Gets Fighter Jet Unit on Guam as US, Facing China Threat, Lauds Closer Ties with Allies,” South China Morning Post, December 9, 2019.
[19]. Christensen, Thomas J. Useful adversaries: Grand strategy, domestic mobilization, and Sino-American conflict, 1947-1958. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
[20]. Chong, Ja Ian. "Diverging paths? Singapore-China relations and the East Asian maritime domain." Maritime Awareness Project 26 (2017): 1-9.
[21]. Ting, Ming Hwa. Singapore’s foreign policy: Beyond realism. PhD, dissertation, University of Adelaide, 2010.
Cite this article
Wang,L. (2023). Singapore’s New ‘Hedging’ Strategy in the Post-epidemic Era. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,5,377-391.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies (ICIHCS 2022), Part 4
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).