Download pdf
Comparative Analysis of Counter-Strike 2 and Valorant
- 1 Michigan State University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
With the rapid development of e-sports and online games, shooting games have received significant global attention and popularity. This article uses the research methodology of literature review to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the disparities and attributes of the two shooting games, Counter-Strike 2 (CS2) and Valorant, in terms of gameplay, community engagement, and business strategy. Through detailed analysis, this article finds that Valorant emphasizes character diversity and innovative skill systems in game design to enhance the strategy and interactivity of the game; while CS2 retains the fundamental aspects of traditional first-person shooting games, such as precise tactical execution and technical requirements, focusing on the technical depth and operational difficulty of the game. In terms of business model, CS2 continues the open market system for skin trading , fostering economic interaction among players. In contrast, Valorant adopts a more closed and direct sales approach, offering exclusive skins at fixed prices, and exerting control over the market. This research serves as a valuable resource for game developers in shaping future game design and market strategy, and it also introduces a new theoretical perspective to the field of game research, enhancing the understand of how different game designs influence player behavior and market response.
Keywords
eSports, Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, gameplay, community interaction
[1]. Rizani, M. N. and Iida, H. , Analysis of Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, 2018 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (ICECOS), 2018:373-378
[2]. Saputra, D., & Sawitri, H.. Virtual Communication to Every Valorant Online Game Player in Developing Game Strategy. International Journal of Education, Information Technology, and Others, 6(2), 2023:44-61.
[3]. Wang Y. The evolving game mechanics in esports first-person shooter games. Northeastern University, 2021.
[4]. Information for each type of agent in Valorant, 2020. https://playvalorant.com/en-us/news/announcements/beginners-guide/
[5]. Xenopoulos, Peter & Coelho, Bruno & Silva, Claudio. Optimal Team Economic Decisions in Counter-Strike. Cornell University, 2021.
[6]. Valorant weapon prices, 2020. https://playvalorant.com/en-us/
[7]. Weapon costs and rewards in CS2, 2023, https://bo3.gg/articles/how-does-the-economy-work-in-cs2
[8]. Hohlfeld, Lena. Gaming Communities. HAMK Valkeakoski International Business, 2022.
[9]. Hardenstein, Taylor Stanton. Skins in the game: counter-strike, esports, and the shady world of online gambling. UNLV Gaming Law Journal, 7(2), 2017:117-138.
[10]. Huffman KA. Designing an effective system to reduce adverse behavior towards girl gamers within the valorant competitive gaming community. Miami University, 2023.
[11]. Glaser, T. Steam and the Platformization of Virtual Goods: An Analysis of the Weapon Skin Economy in Counter Strike: Global Offensive. Spiel|Formen, 2022: 139-162.
Cite this article
Zhou,Q. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Counter-Strike 2 and Valorant. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,54,112-118.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).