Research Article
Open access
Published on 31 July 2024
Download pdf
Li,L. (2024). ESL Instructional Practices and Teacher Preparation: A Mixed Methods Study at a Chinese International High School. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,61,35-39.
Export citation

ESL Instructional Practices and Teacher Preparation: A Mixed Methods Study at a Chinese International High School

Liuman Li *,1,
  • 1 University of Pennsylvania

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/61/20240424

Abstract

This mixed methods study investigates ESL instructional practices at Shenzhen Experimental High School, a Chinese international secondary institution. The findings will provide data-driven insights into optimal teaching methods for Chinese adolescent ELLs. This holds significant implications for enhancing teacher preparation and professional development programs in international schools striving to meet the needs of diverse linguistic learners at Shenzhen Experimental to identify areas for improved professional development tailored to this context. The goal is informing data-driven reforms to enhance outcomes for the school’s adolescent English language learners (ELLs). This research also provides an important foundation and model for future inquiries illuminating the multidimensional competencies that enable ESL teachers to create inclusive, linguistically responsive learning environments.

Keywords

ESL pedagogy, teacher preparation, professional development, Chinese ELLs, urban education

[1]. Rodriguez, D., Ringler, M., O'Neal, D., & Bunn, K. (2010). English language learners’ perceptions of school environment. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24(2), 1-13.

[2]. Göbel, K., & Helmke, A. (2010). Intercultural learning in English as foreign language instruction: The importance of teachers’ intercultural experience and the usefulness of precise instructional directives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1571-1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.004

[3]. Walker, A., Shafer, J., & Iiams, M. (2004). Not in my classroom: Teacher attitudes towards English language learners in the mainstream classroom. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 2(1), 130-160.

[4]. Calderón, M., Slavin, R., & Sánchez, M. (2011). Effective instruction for English learners. The Future of Children, 21(1), 103-127. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2011.0007

[5]. Lindholm-Leary, K., & Block, N. (2010). Achievement in predominantly low SES/Hispanic dual language schools. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050902777546Snow, M. A., & Lanza, E. (Eds.). (2011). The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[6]. August, D., Branum-Martin, L., Cárdenas-Hagan, E., Francis, D. J., Powell, J., Moore, S., & Haynes, E. F. (2014). Helping ELLs meet the Common Core State Standards for literacy in science: The impact of an instructional intervention focused on academic language. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(1), 54-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2013.836763

[7]. Aceves, T. C., & Orosco, M. J. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching (Document No. IC-2). Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center website: http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/

[8]. Rodriguez, D. (2010). Profiles of teacher certification practices for preparing mainstream teachers for English language learners in Arizona, California, and Massachusetts. Journal of Latinos and Education, 9(3), 200-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431003761226

[9]. Guo, L. (2012). New curriculum reform implementation: A case study on a foreign language curriculum reform in a high school in North China. Frontiers of Education in China, 7(2), 271-291. https://doi.org/10.3868/s110-001-012-0017-6

[10]. Moloney, R., & Xu, H. L. (2015). Transitioning beliefs in teachers of Chinese: An Australian perspective. Cogent Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1045217

[11]. Wang, L., Bruce, C., & Hughes, H. (2011). Sociocultural theories and their application in information literacy research and education. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 42(4), 296-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2011.10722242

[12]. Johnson, K. E., & Wells, L. (2017). English language teacher expertise: Why it matters. In G. Barkhuizen (Ed.), Reflections on language teacher identity research (pp. 69-78). New York, NY: Routledge.

[13]. Creswell. J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2017) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th Edition, Sage, Newbury Park.

[14]. DelliCarpini, M., & Guler, N. (2013). Success with ELLs: Assessing ELL students in mainstream classes. The English Journal, 102(6), 126-129.

[15]. Thompson, G. L. (2013). A qualitative study of current assessment practices of urban ESOL teachers: Challenges and promises revealed. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 9, 101-111.

[16]. Williams, A. & Johnson, K.E. (2011). Come rain or come shine: Adapting to the urban school context. The Urban Review, 43(3), 310-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-010-0156-6

[17]. Turkan, S., & Buzick, H. M. (2016). Complexities and issues to consider in the evaluation of content teachers of English language learners. Urban Education, 51(2), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085914543111

[18]. Cook, V. (2016). Premises of multi-competence. In V. Cook & W. Li (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multi-competence (pp. 1-25). Cambridge University Press.

[19]. Rodriguez, D. (2005). Teachers' resistance to ideological and pedagogical change: Definitions, theoretical framework, and significance. In A. Canagarajah (Ed.), Reclaiming the local in language policy and education (pp. 61-72). New York, NY: Routledge.

[20]. Sato, T. & Ballinger, S. (2016). Raising language awareness in language learning: A case study of meta-cognitive strategies. Language Awareness, 25(1-2), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1122022

[21]. Brown, J. D. (2009). Foreign and second language teacher education. In A. Burns & J.C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 183-189). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

[22]. Lee, J. S. (2010). The effectiveness of teacher training for EFL teachers in urban secondary schools. Foreign Language Annals, 43(2), 319-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01091.x

[23]. Chen, J. & Chan, J. (2017). Challenges of teaching English to young learners in urban contexts. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 920-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.353

Cite this article

Li,L. (2024). ESL Instructional Practices and Teacher Preparation: A Mixed Methods Study at a Chinese International High School. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,61,35-39.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Psychology and Humanity Studies

Conference website: https://www.icsphs.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-579-5(Print) / 978-1-83558-580-1(Online)
Conference date: 1 March 2024
Editor:Kurt Buhring
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.61
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).