Shaping the Future of Learning, Teaching, and School Leadership Management
- 1 University of Melbourne
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This paper is about transformative trends in education, exploring learning, teaching methodologies, and management of school leadership, which will redefine education in the next ten years and beyond. The concept of personalized learning, the integration of technology in study activities, and the reform of leadership from the traditional, routine-oriented style into the more open, adaptive one are the critical issues of the research currently being conducted. These changes referring to personal learning differences, lifelong learning, and collaborative environment are meant to make them more evolved or advanced. Through the analysis, teachers being purely instructors changed to facilitators of learning, cultural responsiveness to teaching was emphasized, and the impossibility of attaining good outcomes without digitalization was brought into view. On the other hand, transformational leadership is especially relevant for change management with respect to community participation and data-based decision-making. This view of all angles on the future shows how the education systems that tend to be more flexible and diverse, as well as the ones that are better suited to meet all the diverse learning needs of all students, are the ones to thrive in this new global paradigm.
Keywords
Personalized Learning, Technological Integration, Transformational Leadership
[1]. Ghamrawi, N. (2023). Toward agenda 2030 in education: Policies and practices for effective school leadership. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 22(2), 325–347.
[2]. Shengnan, L., & Hallinger, P. (2021). Unpacking the effects of culture on school leadership and teacher learning in China. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(2), 214–233.
[3]. Day, C., Sammons, P., & Gorgen, K. (2020). Successful School Leadership. University of Nottingham.
[4]. Netolicky, D. M. (2020). School leadership during a pandemic: Navigating tensions. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 391–395.
[5]. Beauchamp, G., Hulme, M., Clarke, L., Hamilton, L., & Harvey, J. A. (2021). ‘People miss people’: A study of school leadership and management in the four nations of the United Kingdom in the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 375–392.
[6]. Ridwanulloh, M. U., Huda, S., & Umam, R. (2022). Innovative Leadership Management: The Pattern of School Quality DevelopmentatSMP Muhammadiyah 2 Inovasi Malang. PROGRESIVA: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam, 11(1), 25–42.
[7]. Lopez, A. E. (2021). Examining alternative school leadership practices and approaches: A decolonising school leadership approach. Intercultural Education, 32(4), 359–367.
[8]. Çetin, M., & Karsantık, I. (2022). Current trends in school management: School leadership in education 4.0. In Educational theory in the 21st century: Science, technology, society and education (pp. 197–216). Springer Nature Singapore Singapore.
[9]. Woods, P. A., Torrance, D., Donnelly, C., Hamilton, T., Jones, K., & Potter, I. (2021). Constructions and purposes of school leadership in the UK. School Leadership & Management, 41(1–2), 152–170.
[10]. Larsson, P., & Löwstedt, J. (2023). Distributed school leadership: Making sense of the educational infrastructure. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(1), 138–156.
[11]. Potter, P. D., Pavlakis, A. E., & Roberts, J. K. (2021). Calming the Storm: Natural Disasters, Crisis Management, and School Leadership. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 24(2), 96–111.
[12]. Bush, T. (2021). Assessing successful school leadership: What do we know? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 687–689.
[13]. Phuc, T. Q. B., Nguyen, L. D., Parveen, K., & Wang, M. (2020). Developing a theoretical model to examine factors affecting school leadership effectiveness. Journal of Social Sciences Advancement, 1(1), 16–29.
[14]. Özdemir, N., Gümüş, S., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2022). A systematic review of research on the relationship between school leadership and student achievement: An updated framework and future direction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1(1), 174114322211186.
[15]. Leithwood, K. (2021). A Review of Evidence about Equitable School Leadership. Education Sciences, 11(8), Article 8.
[16]. Pont, B. (2020). A literature review of school leadership policy reforms. European Journal of Education, 55(2), 154–168.
Cite this article
Li,Y. (2024).Shaping the Future of Learning, Teaching, and School Leadership Management.Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,67,1-6.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Psychology and Humanity Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).