Research Article
Open access
Published on 8 November 2024
Download pdf
Chen,L. (2024). Elderly Citizenship Experience under Different Pension Policies: A Comparative Analysis of China and Japan. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,64,70-79.
Export citation

Elderly Citizenship Experience under Different Pension Policies: A Comparative Analysis of China and Japan

Liang Chen *,1,
  • 1 University College London

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/64/20240993

Abstract

As global population structures change rapidly, the social rights and welfare of the elderly have increasingly become a focal point of societal concern. Pension policies not only address economic issues but also encompass welfare levels, social equity, citizenship rights, and identity. This paper explores the impact of different pension policies on the citizenship experience of the elderly by comparing the pension systems of China and Japan. The study is based on pension policy documents and related data from both countries and employs a comparative social policy analysis. The comparison is conducted conceptually, focusing on the scope, content, and depth of the pension policies in China and Japan, in order to reflect on the elderly's citizenship experience in both nations. The research highlights that China’s pension policy features a single-tier structure with limited autonomy and marked urban-rural disparities, which restrict the citizenship experience of the elderly. In contrast, Japan’s retirement policy is characterized by mandatory participation, clear responsibilities, and a multi-tiered structure, providing broader coverage and more comprehensive social rights and a sense of identity for the elderly. However, this system also brings about noticeable class divisions.

Keywords

Pension Policies, Elderly Citizenship Experience, China, Japan.

[1]. Craig G. Citizenship, exclusion and older people[J]. Journal of social policy, 2004, 33(1): 95-114.

[2]. Fang H, Feng J. The Chinese pension system [R]. Cambridge, MA, USA:: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2018.

[3]. Chia N C, Kitamura Y, Tsui A K C. The pension system in Japan and retirement needs of the Japanese elderly[C]//Workshop on Aging and the Status of the Older Population in Southeast Asia, Singapore. 2005.

[4]. Dong K, Wang G. China’s pension system: achievements, challenges and future developments[J]. Economic and Political Studies, 2016, 4(4): 414-433.

[5]. Horioka C Y, Suzuki W, Hatta T. Aging, savings, and public pensions in Japan[J]. Asian Economic Policy Review, 2007, 2(2): 303-319.

[6]. Salditt F, Whiteford P, Adema W. Pension reform in China[J]. International Social Security Review, 2008, 61(3): 47-71.

[7]. Bass S, Oka M, Norton J, et al. Public policy and the old age revolution in Japan[M]. Routledge, 2014.

[8]. Chen X, Eggleston K, Sun A. The impact of social pensions on intergenerational relationships: Comparative evidence from China[J]. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 2018, 12: 225-235.

[9]. Noguchi Y. Problems of public pensions in Japan[J]. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 1983: 43-68.

[10]. Walker, A., & Foster, L. (2006). Four Ageing and Social Class: An Enduring Relationship [m]. The futures of old age, 44.

[11]. Zhu H, Walker A. Pension system reform in China: Who gets what pensions?[J]. Social Policy & Administration, 2018, 52(7): 1410-1424.

[12]. Taylor‐Gooby P. The divisive welfare state[J]. Social Policy & Administration, 2016, 50(6): 712-733.

[13]. Economic Daily. (2023, June 17). Personal pension pilot progresses steadily. People’s Daily Online. Retrieved April 11, 2024, from http://society.people.com.cn/n1/2023/0617/c1008-40016055.html

[14]. Campbell J C. Japanese social policy in comparative perspective[M]. World Bank, 2002.

[15]. Takayama N. A Balance Sheet Approach to Reforming Social Security Pensions in Japan[J]. Economic Review, 2004, 55(1): 38-50.

[16]. Song S. Pension systems and reforms in China and Russia[J]. Chinese Economy, 2009, 42(3): 9-23.

[17]. Kerber L K. The meanings of citizenship[J]. The Journal of American History, 1997, 84(3): 833-854.

[18]. Ignatieff M. The myth of citizenship[J]. Queen's LJ, 1987, 12: 399.

[19]. Turner B S. Outline of a Theory of Citizenship[J]. Sociology, 1990, 24(2): 189-217.

[20]. Barnes R, Auburn T, Lea S. Citizenship in practice[J]. British journal of social psychology, 2004, 43(2): 187-206.

[21]. Isin E F, Turner B S. Citizenship studies: An introduction[J]. Handbook of citizenship studies, 2002, 1(4): 1-10.

[22]. The Routledge handbook of the welfare state[M]. London: Routledge, 2013.

[23]. Seike A. Pension reforms toward an aging society[J]. The Japanese Journal of Social Security Policy, 2003, 2(1): 1-5.

[24]. Wang L, Béland D, Zhang S. Pension fairness in China[J]. China Economic Review, 2014, 28: 25-36.

[25]. Farid M, Cozzarin B P. China's pension reform: Challenges and opportunities[J]. Pensions: An International Journal, 2009, 14(3): 181-190.

[26]. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2024, January 24). Report on pension policy. Retrieved April 10, 2024, from https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202401/content_6927948.htm

[27]. Williamson J B, Fang L, Calvo E. Rural pension reform in China: A critical analysis[J]. Journal of aging studies, 2017, 41: 67-74.

[28]. Salditt F, Whiteford P, Adema W. Pension reform in China: progress and prospects[J]. 2007.

[29]. Japan Pension Service. (2023, April 3). Types of public pension systems and enrollment procedures. Retrieved April 10, 2024, from https://www.nenkin.go.jp/service/seidozenpan/20140710.html

[30]. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (n.d.). Pensions at a glance 2023. Retrieved April 10, 2024, from https://www.oecd.org/els/public-pensions/PAG2023-country-profile-Japan.pdf

[31]. Poston B. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs[J]. The surgical technologist, 2009, 41(8): 347-353.

[32]. Li S, Lin S. Is there any gain from social security privatization?[J]. China Economic Review, 2011, 22(3): 278-289.

[33]. Pozen R C. Tackling the Chinese pension system[M]. Chicago: Paulson Institute, 2013.

[34]. National Pension Fund Association. (n.d.). Types of benefits. Retrieved April 10, 2024, from https://www.npfa.or.jp/system/type_benefit.html

[35]. Zhao R, Zhao Y. The gender pension gap in China[J]. Feminist Economics, 2018, 24(2): 218-239.

[36]. Okamoto A. Welfare analysis of pension reforms in an ageing Japan[J]. The Japanese Economic Review, 2013, 64(4): 452-483.

Cite this article

Chen,L. (2024). Elderly Citizenship Experience under Different Pension Policies: A Comparative Analysis of China and Japan. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,64,70-79.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities

Conference website: https://2024.icgpsh.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-591-7(Print) / 978-1-83558-592-4(Online)
Conference date: 20 December 2024
Editor:Enrique Mallen
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.64
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).