Download pdf
Parallel Imports: The Principle of Domestic Exhaustion of Trademark Rights and the Strict Non-infringement Exception
- 1 East China University of Political Science and Law
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
With the development of globalization, parallel importation has been one of the efficient instruments to promote free trade worldwide. However, the trademark protection involved in parallel importation is complex as it concerns many elements. There is no consensus among countries on the legal nature of parallel imports. This essay comprehensively applies the case law rules, the comparative research rules, the literature analysis and the historical analysis method, analyzing reasons for the dilemma of parallel imports and different postures of countries and regions towards it. Some countries oppose parallel importers based on the theory of domestic exhaustion of trademark rights, while other supports the act for the theory of international exhaustion of trademark rights. Then the essay compares different legal measures taken by the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom and China in the face of parallel imports, and finally concludes that China should adhere to the principle of domestic exhaustion of trademark rights and the strict non-infringement exception for the balancing of private rights and public interests.
Keywords
Parallel imports, Exhaustion of trademark rights, The non-infringement exception.
[1]. Bryan A. Garner (Editor in Chief). (2019) Black’s Law Dictionary, Eleventh Edition. ThomsonReuters.
[2]. A. Bryan Baer. (2019) Price Controls through the Back Door: The Parallel Importation of Pharmaceuticals. J. Intell. Prop. L. 9,109.
[3]. Ralph H. folsom, Michael W. (1995) Gordon, International Business Transactions § 20.8.
[4]. Lei Han. (2017) The principle of international exhaustion of rights and the legal regulation of parallel imports. Hebei Jurisprudence,35(10),150-159.
[5]. CHANG-FA LO. Potential Conflict Between TRIPS and GATT Concerning Parallel Importation of Drugs and Possible Solution to Prevent Undesirable Market Segmentation, Food Drug L.J. 66,73.
[6]. Christopher B. Conley. Parallel Imports: The Tired Debate of the Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights and Why the WTO Should Harmonize the Haphazard Laws of the International Community, 16 Tul. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 189.
[7]. Societe des Produits Nestle, S.A. v. Casa Helvetia, Inc., 982 F.2d 633 (1st Cir. 1992).
[8]. Centrafarm BV v. American Home Products Corporation. CASE 3/78.
[9]. Harman International Industries Inc. v. AB S.A. Case C 175/21.
[10]. Victoria's Secret Store Brand Management Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Jintian Clothing Co., Ltd.
[11]. Yajun Liu, Sun Changliang. (2016) Protection of Trademark Rights in Parallel Importation--Balance of Interests and Legislative Options. Academic Exchange,8,157-161.
[12]. Tait R. Swanson. Combating Gray Market Goods in a Global Market: Comparative Analysis of Intellectual Property Laws and Recommended Strategies, Hous. J. Int'l L. 22,327.
[13]. Hua Gao, Lingqing Zeng. (2023) Legal Improvement of Parallel Importation of Repackaged Products in China - Based on the Reference to EU Legislative Jurisprudence. Journal of Hunan University (Social Science Edition), 37(06).
Cite this article
Guo,J. (2024). Parallel Imports: The Principle of Domestic Exhaustion of Trademark Rights and the Strict Non-infringement Exception. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,65,108-116.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on International Law and Legal Policy
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).