Research Article
Open access
Published on 12 December 2024
Download pdf
Song,M. (2024). On the Institutional Positioning and Theoretical Basis of Administrative Reconsideration as the "Main Channel for Resolving Administrative Disputes". Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,68,80-90.
Export citation

On the Institutional Positioning and Theoretical Basis of Administrative Reconsideration as the "Main Channel for Resolving Administrative Disputes"

Mingru Song *,1,
  • 1 Dalian Maritime University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.18174

Abstract

This article discusses the institutional positioning and theoretical dependence of administrative reconsideration as "the main channel of administrative disputes". With the promotion of the construction of the rule of law government in my country, the administrative reconsideration system has transformed from the internal supervision system to the administrative dispute solution mechanism, and its importance is prominent. From January 1, 2024, the newly implemented revision of the Administrative Review Law clearly clarified the role of administrative reconsideration as the main channel of administrative disputes, and provided legal support for the high -quality development of administrative reconsideration. However, the administrative reconsideration system still faces difficulties such as inaccurate functional positioning, small number of cases, confirmation of subject qualification confirmation and incomplete evidence system. The causes of these dilemma involve the administrative reconsideration agencies and institutional levels, the scope of the case, and the choice of multiple solutions. In order to solve these problems, this article analyzes the effects of some judicialization of administrative reconsideration, the unique advantages of administrative reconsideration, the significance of the dual defendant system, and the administrative reconsideration decision to be forced to enforce the mechanism. By optimizing the administrative reconsideration system, effectively changing the existing disputes, improving the overall effectiveness of administrative disputes, enhancing the public's trust in the administrative reconsideration system, and then promoting the in -depth development of the construction of the rule of law government. The research of this article is of great significance for enriching theoretical research and optimization of administrative dispute resolution mechanisms.

Keywords

administrative reconsideration, administrative dispute resolution, institutional dilemma, main channel

[1]. Xu, K. Y. (2023). Institutional innovation and theoretical interpretation of the new administrative reconsideration law under the main channel goal. Legal Application, (12), 129-139.

[2]. Ma, D. H. (2024). Institutional Innovation for Resolving Administrative Disputes: An Interpretation of the Revised Administrative Reconsideration Law. Journal of Legal Studies, 42(02), 1-10.

[3]. Guo, J. X., Lin, L. (2023). Some practical Issues on Administrative reconsideration and litigation response. Application of Law, (05), 113-125.

[4]. Wu, D, H. (2023). The bi-directional construction of the enforcement mechanism of Administrative Reconsideration Decision — Centered on the goal of responding to the revision of the Administrative Reconsideration Law. Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law, 38(01), 49-59.

[5]. Han, Y. S. (2024). The internal logic and institutional presentation of Administrative Reconsideration to realize the functional positioning of the main channel for resolving disputes — A review of the New Administrative Reconsideration Law. Journal of Jinan University (Social Science Edition). Advance online publication.

[6]. Zhou, C. Y. (2023). The scope of administrative reconsideration is discussed again. Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law, 26(04), 165-177.

[7]. Liang, Y, F., Zhu, Y. X. (2021). Reflections on some major issues concerning the revision of the Administrative Reconsideration Law. Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University, (06), 58-67.

[8]. Deng, W, Y. (2023). The practical dilemma, functional orientation and system optimization of administrative reconsideration mediation. Chinese Administration, (01), 29-35.

[9]. Wang, X. H. (2022). Research on Co-defendant system of Administrative Reconsideration Organs (Master’s Thesis). Heilongjiang University, Harbin.

[10]. Wang, H. W. (2021). Positioning of "Main channel for Resolving Administrative Disputes" and Improvement of Administrative reconsideration System. Journal of Legal and Commercial Studies, 38(05), 19-32.

[11]. Mo, C. Y., Yang, Z. (2021). Positioning of the main channel of Administrative Reconsideration Law. Journal of China University of Political Science and Law, (06), 110-120.

Cite this article

Song,M. (2024). On the Institutional Positioning and Theoretical Basis of Administrative Reconsideration as the "Main Channel for Resolving Administrative Disputes". Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,68,80-90.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Psychology and Humanity Studies

ISBN:978-1-83558-631-0(Print) / 978-1-83558-632-7(Online)
Conference date: 14 February 2025
Editor:Kurt Buhring
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.68
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).