Research Article
Open access
Published on 26 December 2021
Download pdf
Jiang,C. (2021).Critical Period Hypothesis in Language Acquisition.Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,1,66-70.
Export citation

Critical Period Hypothesis in Language Acquisition

Chiheng Jiang *,1,
  • 1 Wuhan University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/1/ICEIPI_152

Abstract

Critical period hypothesis, a popular topic of great significance in language acquisition, was initially deprived from first language acquisition, and further applied to second language acquisition though disputes remain. Former researchers have done myriads of empirical study and concluded diverse theories. This paper purports to briefly review former researches of critical period hypothesis in both first language acquisition and second language acquisition, and then try to probe its interrelation with age effect and implicit learning.

Keywords

critical period hypothesis, age effect, language acquisition, implicate learning

[1]. Penfield, W.; Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and Brain Mechanisms. Princeton: Princeton University Press

[2]. Tallal, P.; Miller, S. L.; Bedi, G.; Byma, G.; Wang, X.; Nagarajan, S. S.; Schreiner, C.; Jenkins, W. M.; Merzenich, M. M. (January 5, 1996). "Language Comprehension in Language-Learning Impaired Children Improved with Acoustically Modified Speech". Science. 271 (5245): 81–84.

[3]. Lenneberg, E.H. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. Wiley.

[4]. Newport EL (1990). "Maturational constraints on language learning". Cognitive Science. 14 (1): 11–28.

[5]. Curtiss S (1977). Genie: a psycholinguistic study of a modern-day wild child. New York: Academic Press.

[6]. Singleton, D.2005. The Critical Period Hypothesis: A coat of many colors. IRAL,43, 269-285

[7]. Flege, J. E., G. H. Yeni-Komshian & S. Liu. 1999. Age constrains on second-language acquisition[J]. Journal of Memory and Language 41(1): 78-104.

[8]. Flege, J. E. & I. MacKay. 2004. Perceiving vowels in a second language[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(1): 1-34.

[9]. Kuhl, P. & P. Iverson. 1995. Linguistic experience and the"perceptual magnet effect"Munro, M. & V. Mann. 2005. Age of immersion as a predictor of foreign accent[J]. Applied Psycholinguistics 26(3): 311-341.

[10]. Munro, M. & V. Mann. 2005. Age of immersion as a predictor of foreign accent[J]. Applied Psycholinguistics 26(3): 311-341.

[11]. Zhang, Y. & Y. Wang. 2007. Neural plasticity in speech acquisition and learning[J]. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10(2): 147-160.

[12]. Snow , C. & M. Hoefnagel2Hohle. 1982. Age differences in the pronunciation of foreign sounds [ A ]

[13]. Long , M. H. 1990. Maturational constraints on language development [J ]. S tudies in Second L anguage Acquisition (12) : 251285.

[14]. Johnson , J. S. & E. L. Newport. 1991. Critical period effects on universal properties of language : The status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language [J ].

[15]. DeKeyser, R. M. 2000. The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(4): 499-533.

[16]. Qureshi, M. A. 2016. A meta-analysis: Age and second language grammar acquisition[J]. System (60): 147- 160.

[17]. Abrahamsson, N. & K. Hyltenstam. 2009. Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny[J]. Language Learning 59(2): 249-306.

[18]. Arnon, I., S. McCauley & M. Christiansen. 2007. Digging up the building blocks of language: Age of acquisition effects for multi-word phrases[J]. Journal of Memory and Language (92): 265-280.

[19]. Silverberg, S. & A. G. Samuel. 2004. The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words[J]. Journal of Memory and Language 51(3): 381-398.

[20]. J.F. Werker, R.C. 2002. Tees Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life[J]. Infant Behavior & Development 25 (2002) 121–133

[21]. Hartshorne, J., Tenenbaum, J., B., & Pinker, S. (2018). A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition , 177, 263-277.

[22]. Birdsong, D, 2005. Nativelikeness and non-nativelikeness in L2A research,43,319-328

[23]. Marinova-Todd S.H.2003 comprehensive analysis of ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

[24]. Krashen, S. 1985. The imputes Hypothesis: Issues and implications. Landon: Longman.

Cite this article

Jiang,C. (2021).Critical Period Hypothesis in Language Acquisition.Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,1,66-70.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries (ICEIPI 2021), Part 1

Conference website: https://www.iceipi.org/
ISBN:978-1-915371-00-3(Print) / 978-1-915371-01-0(Online)
Conference date: 12 August 2021
Editor:C. Rowley
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.1
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).