The Variation of the Meaning of Emojis Taking WeChat’s stickers as an Example

Research Article
Open access

The Variation of the Meaning of Emojis Taking WeChat’s stickers as an Example

Shizhe Wang 1*
  • 1 Xiamen University Malaysia, Selangor, Sepang, 43900, Malaysia, *Corresponding author. Email:    
  • *corresponding author 837307460@qq.com
Published on 1 March 2023 | https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/3/2022659
LNEP Vol.3
ISSN (Print): 2753-7056
ISSN (Online): 2753-7048
ISBN (Print): 978-1-915371-09-6
ISBN (Online): 978-1-915371-10-2

Abstract

The study of the semantics of emoji is, in general, considered from a static perspective. Even when emoji are studied from a dynamic perspective, generational differences are rarely taken into account. An analysis of five typical and controversial emoji in this paper reveals a significant age gap of the usage of emoji.

Keywords:

emoji analysis and search, age differences, emoji semantics

Wang,S. (2023). The Variation of the Meaning of Emojis Taking WeChat’s stickers as an Example. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,3,1147-1151.
Export citation

References

[1]. Herring S C, Dainas A R. Gender and age influences on interpretation of emoji functions[J]. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 2020, 3(2): 1-26.

[2]. Miller Hillberg H, Levonian Z, Kluver D, et al. What i see is what you don't get: The effects of (not) seeing emoji rendering differences across platforms[J]. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2018, 2(CSCW): 1-24.

[3]. Hannah Jean Miller, Daniel Kluver, Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Loren G. Terveen, and Brent J. Hecht. 2017. Understanding emoji ambiguity in context: The role of text in emoji-related miscommunication. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’17). AAAI Press. 152–161.

[4]. Hannah Jean Miller, Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Shuo Chang, Isaac Johnson, Loren Terveen, and Brent Hecht. 2016. Blissfully happy or ready to fight: Varying interpretations of emoji. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’16). AAAI Press. Retrieved from

[5]. Alecia Wolf. 2000. Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. CyberPsychol. Behav. 3, 5 (2000), 827–833.

[6]. Marília Prada, David L. Rodrigues, Margarida V. Garrido, Diniz Lopes, Bernardo Cavalheiro, and Rui Gaspar. 2018. Motives, frequency and attitudes toward emoji and emoticon use. Telemat. Inform. 35, 7 (2018), 1925–1934.

[7]. Anna Oleszkiewicz, Maciej Karwowski, Katarzyna Pisanski, Piotr Sorokowski, Boaz Sobrado, and Agnieszka Sorokowska. 2017. Who uses emoticons? Data from 86,702 Facebook users. Personal. Indiv. Diff. 119 (2017), 289–295

[8]. Emogi Research Team. 2016. 2016 Emoji Report. Retrieved from https://cdn.emogi.com/docs/reports/2016_emoji_report.pdf

[9]. Katy Waldman. 2016. How do Olds use emoji? Incorrectly, according to Wired. Slate. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jun/18/adults-emoji-grow-up-emoticons-teenagers

[10]. Weiß M, Bille D, Rodrigues J, et al. Age-related differences in emoji evaluation[J]. Experimental Aging Research, 2020, 46(5): 416-432.

[11]. Sara Jaeger, Yixun Xia, Pui-Yee Lee, Denise C. Hunter, Michelle K. Beresford, and Gastón Ares. 2017. Emoji questionnaires can be used with a range of population segments: Findings relating to age, gender, and frequency of emoji/emoticon use. Food Qual. Pref.


Cite this article

Wang,S. (2023). The Variation of the Meaning of Emojis Taking WeChat’s stickers as an Example. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,3,1147-1151.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries (ICEIPI 2022), Part II

ISBN:978-1-915371-09-6(Print) / 978-1-915371-10-2(Online)
Editor:Abdullah Laghari, Nasir Mahmood
Conference website: https://www.iceipi.org/
Conference date: 4 August 2022
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.3
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Herring S C, Dainas A R. Gender and age influences on interpretation of emoji functions[J]. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 2020, 3(2): 1-26.

[2]. Miller Hillberg H, Levonian Z, Kluver D, et al. What i see is what you don't get: The effects of (not) seeing emoji rendering differences across platforms[J]. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2018, 2(CSCW): 1-24.

[3]. Hannah Jean Miller, Daniel Kluver, Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Loren G. Terveen, and Brent J. Hecht. 2017. Understanding emoji ambiguity in context: The role of text in emoji-related miscommunication. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’17). AAAI Press. 152–161.

[4]. Hannah Jean Miller, Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Shuo Chang, Isaac Johnson, Loren Terveen, and Brent Hecht. 2016. Blissfully happy or ready to fight: Varying interpretations of emoji. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’16). AAAI Press. Retrieved from

[5]. Alecia Wolf. 2000. Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. CyberPsychol. Behav. 3, 5 (2000), 827–833.

[6]. Marília Prada, David L. Rodrigues, Margarida V. Garrido, Diniz Lopes, Bernardo Cavalheiro, and Rui Gaspar. 2018. Motives, frequency and attitudes toward emoji and emoticon use. Telemat. Inform. 35, 7 (2018), 1925–1934.

[7]. Anna Oleszkiewicz, Maciej Karwowski, Katarzyna Pisanski, Piotr Sorokowski, Boaz Sobrado, and Agnieszka Sorokowska. 2017. Who uses emoticons? Data from 86,702 Facebook users. Personal. Indiv. Diff. 119 (2017), 289–295

[8]. Emogi Research Team. 2016. 2016 Emoji Report. Retrieved from https://cdn.emogi.com/docs/reports/2016_emoji_report.pdf

[9]. Katy Waldman. 2016. How do Olds use emoji? Incorrectly, according to Wired. Slate. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jun/18/adults-emoji-grow-up-emoticons-teenagers

[10]. Weiß M, Bille D, Rodrigues J, et al. Age-related differences in emoji evaluation[J]. Experimental Aging Research, 2020, 46(5): 416-432.

[11]. Sara Jaeger, Yixun Xia, Pui-Yee Lee, Denise C. Hunter, Michelle K. Beresford, and Gastón Ares. 2017. Emoji questionnaires can be used with a range of population segments: Findings relating to age, gender, and frequency of emoji/emoticon use. Food Qual. Pref.