
Tweets and Reactions: Revealing the Possible Misuse and Astray Development of Online Feminism Movements
- 1 The Experimental High School Attached to Beijing Normal University
- 2 Hangzhou Dianzi University
- 3 Camford Royal School
- 4 Shenzhen University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
How do tweets shows online feminism campaigns can be misguided and lead to irrational comments about specific affairs and individuals? This article analyzes the public’s reactions towards the case of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard on Twitter using topic modeling. Also, the report introduces some comparative perspectives on hashtag feminism and provides a link between those theories and actual reactions so that both of them can be better explained. The outcome states that there was an obvious shift in topics between the period of Amber Heard expanding the influence of her accusation towards Johnny Depp using #Metoo and the period of Johnny Depp proving himself innocent through a lawful trial. That is to say, the previous criticism of Johnny Depp and support for Amber Heard lack the judgment to a certain extent. More specifically, these relatively non-objective reactions were due to some of the characteristics of hashtag feminism. And in turn, this study points out that preventing further misuse of online feminism movements will require more studies to have a more detailed understanding of how should online feminism movements operate to help those genuinely in need.
Keywords
feminism, Twitter, Metoo movement, hashtag feminism
[1]. Clark, R. “Hope in a hashtag”: The discursive activism of# WhyIStayed. Feminist media studies 16(5), 788-804 (2016).
[2]. Trott, V. Networked feminism: Counterpublics and the intersectional issues of# MeToo. Feminist Media Studies 21(7), 1125-1142 (2021).
[3]. Shugerman, E. Me Too: Why are women sharing stories of sexual assault and how did it start. The Independent, 10(17), (2017).
[4]. Peterson, J., & Densley, J. Cyber violence: What do we know and where do we go from here?. Aggression and violent behavior 34, 193-200 (2017).
[5]. Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1975). The polarizing effect of group discussion: The discovery that discussion tends to enhance the average prediscussion tendency has stimulated new insights about the nature of group influence. American Scientist 63(3), 297-303 (1975).
[6]. Parsons, R. “I see you, I believe you, I stand with you”: # MeToo and the performance of networked feminist visibility. Feminist Media Studies 21(3), 362-380 (2021).
[7]. González Canché, M. Machine Driven Classification of Open-ended Responses (MDCOR): An Analytic Framework and Free Software Application to Classify Text Responses in Survey Research. The University of Pennsylvania (2021).
Cite this article
Wang,X.;Shan,H.;Sun,R.;Mu,J. (2023). Tweets and Reactions: Revealing the Possible Misuse and Astray Development of Online Feminism Movements. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,12,164-184.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).