Research on the Advantages and Disadvantages of Cramming Education

Research Article
Open access

Research on the Advantages and Disadvantages of Cramming Education

Ming Yuan 1*
  • 1 Shanghai Qibaodwight High School    
  • *corresponding author myuan_julie@qibaodwight.org
Published on 26 October 2023 | https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/12/20230813
LNEP Vol.12
ISSN (Print): 2753-7056
ISSN (Online): 2753-7048
ISBN (Print): 978-1-83558-049-3
ISBN (Online): 978-1-83558-050-9

Abstract

With the rapid development of China's economy and technology, China's educational goals have also changed. Similarly, teaching methods should also change with the change of educational objectives. This paper mainly studies the advantages and disadvantages of cramming. Through the analysis of existing literature and data, it can be found that the disadvantages of cramming education include killing students' interest and curiosity, leading to their resistance to learning, and harming students' health; The advantage of cramming education lies in its help for exam-oriented education, thus it is very suitable for our national conditions now as well as its effective help for knowledge accumulation. In view of this, it may be concluded that cramming does more harm than good and is not suitable to achieve our future educational goals.

Keywords:

duck-filling education, education in China, education pattern

Yuan,M. (2023). Research on the Advantages and Disadvantages of Cramming Education. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,12,215-218.
Export citation

References

[1]. Ding Lijie. The impact of "indoctrination" education on the recipients' acceptance of "discovery" education[J]. Literature and Education,2017,(15):166-167.

[2]. Teng Shouyao. Aesthetic education - the key to modernization of education[J]. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 1995,(02):63-69+128.

[3]. Fan Daming, Wu Xiulan, Li Shanyong. The development of "indoctrination education" in Western pedagogy and its reflection[J]. Journal of Qinzhou College,2013,28(09):40-45.

[4]. Wang Yimiao. The impact of discovery education[J]. Examination and evaluation,2014,(07):128.

[5]. Wang Yanjuan. The inevitability of the withdrawal of "duck-fill" education from the stage[J]. Modern Education,2012,(Z3):96.

[6]. Deng Jianjun, Qu Wenwen. Indoctrination education: the current education is not yet out of the box[J]. Educational Theory and Practice, 1996,(02):46-48.


Cite this article

Yuan,M. (2023). Research on the Advantages and Disadvantages of Cramming Education. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,12,215-218.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries

ISBN:978-1-83558-049-3(Print) / 978-1-83558-050-9(Online)
Editor:Javier Cifuentes-Faura, Enrique Mallen
Conference website: https://www.iceipi.org/
Conference date: 7 August 2023
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.12
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Ding Lijie. The impact of "indoctrination" education on the recipients' acceptance of "discovery" education[J]. Literature and Education,2017,(15):166-167.

[2]. Teng Shouyao. Aesthetic education - the key to modernization of education[J]. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 1995,(02):63-69+128.

[3]. Fan Daming, Wu Xiulan, Li Shanyong. The development of "indoctrination education" in Western pedagogy and its reflection[J]. Journal of Qinzhou College,2013,28(09):40-45.

[4]. Wang Yimiao. The impact of discovery education[J]. Examination and evaluation,2014,(07):128.

[5]. Wang Yanjuan. The inevitability of the withdrawal of "duck-fill" education from the stage[J]. Modern Education,2012,(Z3):96.

[6]. Deng Jianjun, Qu Wenwen. Indoctrination education: the current education is not yet out of the box[J]. Educational Theory and Practice, 1996,(02):46-48.