Download pdf
Effects of Two Vocabulary Instructional Methods: Contrasting and Separating Orthographically Similar Words
- 1 BNU-HKBU United International College
- 2 BNU-HKBU United International College
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
While Chinese EFL learners memorize vocabulary items, they may encounter some words that are similar in semantics, orthography, phonology, and so forth. Studies have conducted research on whether the similarity of vocabulary would facilitate or hinder students’ learning outcomes. While most scholars found that learners can perform better when they memorize similar lexis than learning unrelated sets, i.e., dissimilar words. This research compares two ways of giving students instructions about orthographically similar English vocabulary. A total of 52 university junior students participated in this study. Pre-test, immediate, and delayed post-test were conducted for examining students’ learning outcomes. Results demonstrated that instructions with a highlight on contrasting the nuances of orthographically similar words impede students’ retention performance compared with those in the control group who were instructed without emphasizing the similarity and nuances of the words. Although the result may not generalize to all EFL contexts, it provides significant pedagogical implications to teachers and other educational practitioners. It is suggested that emphasizing the nuances of orthographically similar words is less effective for students’ vocabulary learning than without the emphasis. Students should be encouraged to explore and find out the similarity and nuances of orthographically similar words by themselves rather than being told by teachers.
Keywords
similar vocabulary, EFL, vocabulary learning, retention, instruction
[1]. Ghalebi, R., Sadighi, F., & Bagheri, M. S. (2020). Vocabulary learning strategies: A comparative study of EFL learners. Cogent Psychology, 7(1).
[2]. Baxter, P., Bekkering, H., Dijkstra, T., Droop, M., van den Hurk, M., & Leoné, F. (2022). Contrasting orthographically similar words facilitates adult second language vocabulary learning. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101582.
[3]. Laufer, B. (1988). The concept of “synforms” (similar lexical forms) in vocabulary acquisition. Language and Education, 2(2), 113–132.
[4]. Ishii, T. (2015). Semantic connection or visual connection: Investigating the true source of confusion. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 712–722.
[5]. Lally, C., Taylor, J. S. H., Lee, C. H., & Rastle, K. (2020). Shaping the precision of letter position coding by varying properties of a writing system. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(3), 374–382.
[6]. Llach, M. (2015). Lexical errors in writing at the end of primary and secondary education: Description and pedagogical implications. Porta Linguarum: Revista Internacional de Did´actica de Las Lenguas Extranjeras, 23, 109–124.
[7]. Nation, P. (2000). Learning vocabulary in lexical sets: Dangers and guidelines. TESOL Journal, 9(2), 6–10.
[8]. Tinkham, T. (1997). The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. Second Language Research, 13(2), 138–163.
[9]. Storkel, H. L., & Lee, S.-Y. (2011). The independent effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on the lexical acquisition by preschool children. Language & Cognitive Processes, 26(2), 191.
[10]. Erten, İ. H., & Tekin, M. (2008). Effects on vocabulary acquisition of presenting new words in semantic sets versus semantically unrelated sets. System (Linköping), 36(3), 407–422.
[11]. Papathanasiou, E. (2009). An investigation of two ways of presenting vocabulary. ELT Journal, 63(4), 313–322.
[12]. Waring, R. (1997). The negative effects of learning words in semantic sets: A replication. System, 25(2), 261–274.
[13]. Meade, G. (2020). The role of phonology during visual word learning in adults: An integrative review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(1), 15–23.
Cite this article
Zhou,Z.;Zhuang,Y. (2023). Effects of Two Vocabulary Instructional Methods: Contrasting and Separating Orthographically Similar Words. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,16,272-277.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).