References
[1]. Qiu, B. Ideas for Adjudicating Disputes over Inheritance of Online Virtual Property. People’s Justice, 2020.
[2]. (2018) Jing 0108 Min Chu No.15687. Beijing Haidian District People’s Court, 2019.
[3]. Wang, L., Wang, P., Bao, S. A Legal Exploration of Dispute Resolution for Bitcoin and Digital Currency-like Disputes. Investec Republican Law Firm, 2021.
[4]. Wang, J. Ideas for Deciding Bitcoin Disputes from the Legal Nature of Bitcoin. Beijing Arbitration, 2020.
[5]. Zeng, X. Analysis on the difficulty of judicial settlement of virtual currency transaction dispute. Jin Tiancheng Law Firm, 2023.
[6]. Liu, H. Research on legal Issues of digital currency investment disputes. Master’s thesis of Shandong University of Finance and Economics, 2022.
[7]. Li, J., Mo, F. Review and Optimization of Civil Judicial Adjudication of Private digital Currency. Guanghe Law Firm, 2021.
[8]. Zhang, C. A Study of the Real Risks of Bitcoin and the Legal Regulation in China. Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2014.
[9]. He, L. Virtual currency supervision experience of America and its enlightenment to our country. Wuhan Finance, 2018.
[10]. Li, M. Research on the legal supervision of virtual currency trading platform. Master dissertation of East China University of Political Science and Law, 2019.
[11]. Yang, B., Han, S. One of the crypto Asset Series from the perspective of cross-border compliance: An Analysis of Mainstream regulatory Trends and Investment Legal Risks in cryptocurrencies. Jin Tiancheng Law Firm, 2022.
[12]. ANDY PAG. Owner of failed Mt. Gox bitcoin exchange, who lost $500m of customers money, in line for over $700m of their funds, due to legal black-hole. 2017. https://www.mtgoxlegal.com/2017/10/27/press-release/
[13]. Dong, J. The enlightenment of bitcoin supervision in Japan to our country. China credit card, 2017.
Cite this article
Xin,S. (2023). Study on Dispute Resolution of Tort Liability Disputes between Digital Currency Platforms and Users — Case Analysis in China and Abroad. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,18,147-154.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Qiu, B. Ideas for Adjudicating Disputes over Inheritance of Online Virtual Property. People’s Justice, 2020.
[2]. (2018) Jing 0108 Min Chu No.15687. Beijing Haidian District People’s Court, 2019.
[3]. Wang, L., Wang, P., Bao, S. A Legal Exploration of Dispute Resolution for Bitcoin and Digital Currency-like Disputes. Investec Republican Law Firm, 2021.
[4]. Wang, J. Ideas for Deciding Bitcoin Disputes from the Legal Nature of Bitcoin. Beijing Arbitration, 2020.
[5]. Zeng, X. Analysis on the difficulty of judicial settlement of virtual currency transaction dispute. Jin Tiancheng Law Firm, 2023.
[6]. Liu, H. Research on legal Issues of digital currency investment disputes. Master’s thesis of Shandong University of Finance and Economics, 2022.
[7]. Li, J., Mo, F. Review and Optimization of Civil Judicial Adjudication of Private digital Currency. Guanghe Law Firm, 2021.
[8]. Zhang, C. A Study of the Real Risks of Bitcoin and the Legal Regulation in China. Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2014.
[9]. He, L. Virtual currency supervision experience of America and its enlightenment to our country. Wuhan Finance, 2018.
[10]. Li, M. Research on the legal supervision of virtual currency trading platform. Master dissertation of East China University of Political Science and Law, 2019.
[11]. Yang, B., Han, S. One of the crypto Asset Series from the perspective of cross-border compliance: An Analysis of Mainstream regulatory Trends and Investment Legal Risks in cryptocurrencies. Jin Tiancheng Law Firm, 2022.
[12]. ANDY PAG. Owner of failed Mt. Gox bitcoin exchange, who lost $500m of customers money, in line for over $700m of their funds, due to legal black-hole. 2017. https://www.mtgoxlegal.com/2017/10/27/press-release/
[13]. Dong, J. The enlightenment of bitcoin supervision in Japan to our country. China credit card, 2017.