The Influence of Constructivist Learning Style on College Students' Learning of Basic Subjects

Research Article
Open access

The Influence of Constructivist Learning Style on College Students' Learning of Basic Subjects

Qianyu Chen 1 , Xinyu Cheng 2 , Enze Jing 3*
  • 1 Quanzhou Normal University    
  • 2 Shandong University of Arts    
  • 3 Suzhou City College    
  • *corresponding author 1753972183@szcu.edu.cn
Published on 20 November 2023 | https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/22/20230334
LNEP Vol.22
ISSN (Print): 2753-7056
ISSN (Online): 2753-7048
ISBN (Print): 978-1-83558-123-0
ISBN (Online): 978-1-83558-124-7

Abstract

Today, constructivism has become an important research topic in university discipline studies. Multiple studies have shown that using a constructivist approach to learning may have a positive impact on the learning of college students. The researchers looked at the factors involved in using or not using this method. However, more detailed research on the impact of constructivism on learning is lacking. Therefore, this paper collects data through questionnaires, takes the university basic course “Advanced English” as an example, using variance analysis, correlation analysis and frequency analysis and other methods to explore the impact of constructivist learning methods on college students’ English subject learning. The results show that: 1. Although nearly half of college students use constructivist learning methods in their daily English learning, only about 25% of students choose constructivist learning methods when preparing for CET-4 and CET-6, and most students prefer to prepare for the test by accumulating English knowledge in daily life. 2. The students who learn English with the constructivist learning method and the students who learn English with other learning methods are not much different in the final grades of Level 4. Different learning methods have a great influence on students’ learning, and the high score ratio of students who use constructivism in CET-4 will be higher than those who use other learning methods. The impact of learning methods on students’ performance is not as important as imagined. Students who use constructivist learning methods for English learning do not have better grades in the CET-4.

Keywords:

constructivism, learning style, university basic course, advanced English

Chen,Q.;Cheng,X.;Jing,E. (2023). The Influence of Constructivist Learning Style on College Students' Learning of Basic Subjects. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,22,327-334.
Export citation

References

[1]. Mohammed S H, Kinyó L. (2020) The role of constructivism in the enhancement of social studies education[J]. Journal of critical reviews 7(7): 249-256.

[2]. Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction.

[3]. Thompson, Penny. (2018). Foundations of educational technology.

[4]. Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature, and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.

[5]. Jaleel, S., & Verghis, A. M. (2015). Knowledge creation in constructivist learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 8-12.

[6]. Gomleksiz, M. N., & Elaldi, Ş. (2011). Yapılandırmacı Yaklaşım Bağlamında Yabancı Dil Öğretimi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 6(2).

[7]. Krahenbuhl, K. S. (2016). Student-centered education and constructivism: Challenges, concerns, and clarity for teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues, and Ideas, 89(3), 97-105.

[8]. Basturk, S. (2016). Primary Pre-Service Teachers’ Perspectives on Constructivism and Its Implementation in the Schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 904-912.

[9]. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.

[10]. Ah-Nam, L., & Osman, K. (2017). Developing 21st Century Skills through a Constructivist-Constructionist Learning Environment. K-12 STEM Education, 3(2), 205-216.

[11]. Gunduz, N., & Hursen, C. (2015). Constructivism in Teaching and Learning; Content Analysis Evaluation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 526-533.


Cite this article

Chen,Q.;Cheng,X.;Jing,E. (2023). The Influence of Constructivist Learning Style on College Students' Learning of Basic Subjects. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,22,327-334.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities

ISBN:978-1-83558-123-0(Print) / 978-1-83558-124-7(Online)
Editor:Enrique Mallen, Javier Cifuentes-Faura
Conference website: https://www.icgpsh.org/
Conference date: 13 October 2023
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.22
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Mohammed S H, Kinyó L. (2020) The role of constructivism in the enhancement of social studies education[J]. Journal of critical reviews 7(7): 249-256.

[2]. Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction.

[3]. Thompson, Penny. (2018). Foundations of educational technology.

[4]. Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature, and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.

[5]. Jaleel, S., & Verghis, A. M. (2015). Knowledge creation in constructivist learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 8-12.

[6]. Gomleksiz, M. N., & Elaldi, Ş. (2011). Yapılandırmacı Yaklaşım Bağlamında Yabancı Dil Öğretimi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 6(2).

[7]. Krahenbuhl, K. S. (2016). Student-centered education and constructivism: Challenges, concerns, and clarity for teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues, and Ideas, 89(3), 97-105.

[8]. Basturk, S. (2016). Primary Pre-Service Teachers’ Perspectives on Constructivism and Its Implementation in the Schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 904-912.

[9]. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.

[10]. Ah-Nam, L., & Osman, K. (2017). Developing 21st Century Skills through a Constructivist-Constructionist Learning Environment. K-12 STEM Education, 3(2), 205-216.

[11]. Gunduz, N., & Hursen, C. (2015). Constructivism in Teaching and Learning; Content Analysis Evaluation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 526-533.