1. Introduction
Technology has a huge impact on the lives in the digital era. This impact is never more apparent than in the area of early infancy. Tangible toys, outdoor activities, and storytelling sessions traditionally marked early childhood. However, it is common to observe newborns interacting with voice-activated devices, swiping screens, and utilizing educational apps. The academic community’s interest in this topic has grown from the early research in this field, which was mostly concerned with superficial behavioral consequences [1]. Determining the underlying cognitive ramifications of such widespread technological interactions is now of growing interest.
The research centers on this background and explores the complex relationships between early cognitive development and technology. The main goal is to determine how the digital age affects children’s critical intellectual abilities, including thinking, reasoning, and comprehension. The debate over this issue is filled with contradictions. While one group of specialists applauds technology’s unsurpassed educational potential, another group warns against the possible loss of crucial human-to-human relationships and experiences.
The methodology is based on a thorough literature review that promotes comprehensive knowledge. This entails thoroughly synthesizing data from various scholarly sources and thoroughly blending various viewpoints. The research maps the trajectory of early childhood cognitive processes in the context of constantly changing technology environments by analyzing major academic publications. The methodology also aims to uncover knowledge gaps to provide a new perspective on this important subject.
Beyond just academic interest, the project’s importance is clear. This research seeks to influence real-world situations by influencing educational legislation, advising parents, and helping teachers develop innovative pedagogical practices. Alam emphasizes the need to comprehend technology’s complex function in the drive for digital advancement [2]. This research aims to provide stakeholders with a fair and well-informed viewpoint that will help them take advantage of technology’s many advantages while being aware of its possible drawbacks. The main objective is clear: make sure that the future generation, despite being technologically knowledgeable, does not forget fundamental cognitive and emotional milestones.
2. Understanding Cognitive Development in Early Childhood
Cognitive development in eаrly childhood is а deeply complеx аnd multifаceted proсess, weаving together thе growth of thinking, reаsoning, аnd understаnding thаt constitutes thе intellectuаl fаbric of а child’s mind. This process involves improving memory, grоwing logicаl thinking skills, аnd developing ideаs аnd beliefs. This complex development affects how children engage with their environment, ask questions, discover answers, and establish the groundwork for their cognitive capacities later in life. It includes the capacity to gather, process, and use information. Early intervention and assistance are crucial since the brain’s plasticity at this stage emphasizes flexibility and capacity for development.
Early childhood is a crucial period for cognitive development and a rich window of opportunity to mold and enhance these skills. During this time, the building blocks for thinking, language, vision, and attitude are established, laying the groundwork for future intellectual, emotional, and social development. Children quickly acquire fundamental skills, including spatial awareness, symbolic reasoning, and emotional control, from infancy until age eight. These skills are critical for understanding arithmetic, reading, science, and social interaction. Children’s self-awareness, ability to make decisions, and relationships with people and their surroundings are all impacted by the subtleties of this development [3].
Although Jean Piaget’s theory is a crucial viewpoint for understanding cognitive development, it will only be briefly addressed to set the scene for this debate. The developmental milestones span periods of cognitive development, from sensory-motor experiences in infancy to abstract reasoning in adolescence, were made clear by Piaget’s work. His approach identifies qualitative shifts in thinking by segmenting it into phases such as the sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, and formal operational eras. Each stage provides a glimpse into the complex design of the developing mind. These developmental phases describe how well kids can comprehend things, symbols, logical principles, and abstract ideas while offering a framework for the different changes kids go through as they become older [4].
The combination of several elements, including biological maturation, contextual influences, educational interventions, stimulation, exploration, play, and technology involvement, significantly impacts cognitive development throughout these formative years. Parental guidance, caregiving, and educational methods play major roles in this complex and delicate process. Environmental factors that affect cognitive development include socioeconomic position, access to a decent education, cultural norms, peer interactions, and exposure to the arts and literature. This intricate tapestry of development is further complicated by individual variations, such as genetic predispositions, temperaments, and learning styles [5].
Caregivers, educators, parents, and society must realize the importance of early childhood in cognitive development and offer the appropriate support, resources, caring, and environment for every child to thrive. Opportunities for discovery, creativity, and social connection help promote thinking, reasoning, and understanding. Optimal cognitive development requires an adequate educational curriculum, emotional intelligence, resilience, critical thinking, and evidence-based teaching practices. Technology’s growing influence on children’s surroundings must also be acknowledged. How youngsters use technology may affect their cognitive development as they become more digital. Technology may enhance cognitive development, provide interactive learning experiences, stimulate cooperation and creativity, or bring hazards, including overexposure or decreased social skills [1].
Understanding how early childhood affects cognitive development demands a sophisticated, comprehensive approach. It requires going beyond established beliefs and analyzing a wider range of factors, from family to global technology. This multimodal approach aids in guiding children through these crucial years, establishing a foundation for future academic and personal achievements. Early cognitive development can be enriched by emphasizing thinking, reasoning, and understanding while integrating technology, educational philosophies, societal norms, and personalized strategies. Early childhood education and cognitive skill development impact community and country intelligence.
3. The Role of Technology in Early Childhood
Early childhood has been most affected by digital technology. Technology has become a daily reality for young children from an abstract, distant idea in recent decades. Toddlers and pre-schoolers increasingly use digital gadgets and apps [6]. Technology now shapes young brains with huge repercussions. This transformation has revolutionized educators’ tools and pedagogy, ushering in a new era of early digital literacy. Technology in early childhood education has changed how children view, interact with, and understand their environment, creating new opportunities and problems for both parents and educators.
The widespread accessibility of tablets, smartphones, and other digital tools has ensured that children are introduced to technology at an increasingly young age [1]. These once-considered luxuries, which now serve purposes as varied as entertainment, education, and interactive play, have evolved into household necessities. Consequently, kids start their digital journey virtually from birth and gain abilities that let them use both conventional learning methods and the digital world. Thus, the pervasiveness of technology has greatly influenced the development of a generation that is not just used to but also reliant on digital instruments. The problems of this digital immersion call for a sophisticated understanding of technology’s place in children’s lives to maximize its advantages and minimize any possible negatives.
The profound integration of technology in early childhood has implications that extend far beyond mere entertainment, significantly impacting cognitive development [7]. The range and complexity of the educational applications and interactive games that are now accessible excite young brains in ways that were before unthinkable. Such methods often promote problem-solving skills, logical thinking, and creativity via personalized, engaging experiences. Using clever algorithms and adaptive learning technology, educators may customize the learning process to meet the requirements of certain students. Children’s natural interest is piqued by this tailored approach, which encourages them to discover and comprehend their surroundings. It highlights technology’s enormous potential and transformational impact in forming young brains and marks an exciting new frontier in education.
Technology aids children’s social and emotional development and cognitive progress (8). The capacity to communicate digitally across borders promotes a global viewpoint and encourages empathy, cultural awareness, and teamwork. But even the platforms that make these interactions possible may be dangerous. Overusing screens and receiving little direction might hinder the development of crucial face-to-face social skills. To effectively use technology’s benefits while minimizing any possible drawbacks, this contradiction offers a challenging situation for parents and educators that calls for careful balance and continual review.
While the benefits of technology in early childhood education are undeniable, its integration must be carefully balanced with traditional learning and developmental practices. Physical play, hands-on discovery, and face-to-face social connection may all be overshadowed by an excessive dependence on digital resources. These development components are still very important, necessitating the educated, thoughtful choices of parents, caregivers, and educators to produce a balanced, harmonious fusion of technology and traditional ways. It is possible to make sure that technology serves as a helpful supplement to important human interactions and experiences rather than a replacement for them by emphasizing a holistic perspective on child development and implementing a multifaceted strategy that considers each child’s needs and developmental stages.
4. Impact of Technology on Cognitive Development in Early Childhood
4.1. Positive Effects
The emergence of educational robotics and child-centric computer programming has provided a fresh avenue for hands-on, experiential learning [1]. These technologies, created especially for children, let them connect with technology directly and turn their intangible ideas into concrete results. The development of computational thinking, logic formulation, and problem decomposition abilities is aided by such active engagement. These technology tools foster children’s cognitive development and provide them with a feeling of success and self-efficacy. As a result, children become active producers in the digital era rather than passive consumers.
The rise of interactive e-books and purposefully developed video games marks a significant shift in how children consume content [9]. The day when playing or reading was a passive pastime has long passed. Children are engaged by the interactive components of contemporary e-books, which promote inquiry and critical thinking. Similarly, well-made video games push young brains to plan, make predictions, and tackle complex issues [10]. Children’s logical and spatial reasoning abilities continuously improve because of this interactive nature and dynamic feedback systems while intensely engaged.
One of the defining features of contemporary educational technology is its unparalleled adaptability, allowing it to cater to the unique learning trajectories of individual children [5]. Due to adaptive algorithms and personalized feedback systems, digital learning platforms may pace themselves according to the child’s growth, focusing on areas that need improvement while advancing areas of strength. This adaptive technology eliminates the one-size-fits-all philosophy historically defining formal education by considering each student’s preferences, aptitudes, and learning speed. These systems may quickly identify a child’s strengths and shortcomings through real-time data analysis, giving them feedback right away that can be very helpful for improving understanding and retention. This adaptability allows for individualizing each child’s learning path, which fosters better understanding, increased confidence, and, most importantly, the growth of crucial cognitive functions like problem-solving abilities.
However, children may interact with the information in a manner that is most relevant to them because of the individualized aspect of this instructional strategy, which increases their interest and desire to learn. This flexibility helps children learn more than just how to acquire information; it also gives them the capacity to take an active role in their education. This fosters a feeling of agency and independence that may have long-term advantages [5]. Additionally, it enables parents and educators to acquire distinctive insights into a child’s learning process, providing tailored advice and assistance that fits the child’s particular requirements. A future where each child’s learning path is acknowledged and supported is on the horizon as technology advances and offers the promise of ever more tailored and responsive educational experiences. While using technology’s remarkable ability to individualize and improve learning, the problem remains in ensuring that these potent tools are utilized appropriately and ethically.
The surge in technology’s role within education has not gone unnoticed by educators and policymakers alike. The use of technology in early childhood teaching is given priority in current professional development models [11]. This involves integrating technology into the larger educational tapestry rather than displacing conventional approaches. When done successfully, this integration produces an engaging learning environment rich with resources that foster creativity, encourage initiative in problem-solving, and advance cognitive development [12]. Traditional pedagogy and contemporary technology working together promote holistic development and give kids the skills they’ll need in the future.
4.2. Negative Effects
Not all technological innovations suit children of every age group [13]. Understanding this variability is essential for integrating technology with child development since children’s cognitive capacities, interests, and demands vary greatly throughout various developmental stages. For younger children, certain technology tools may be overwhelming or unimportant, while others may be interesting and helpful for older children. Without considering these subtleties, using technology might result in disengagement, dissatisfaction, and possible obstruction of developmental stages. To ensure that technology serves as a developmental catalyst rather than an impediment to a child’s growth, it is important to carefully assess their age, developmental stage, and specific requirements. This entails choosing the appropriate hardware and software, establishing use restrictions, and offering advice. Technology may be turned from a dangerous distraction into an empowering tool that fosters learning and development if educators and parents respect each child’s developmental stage and requirements.
A child’s cognitive development may suffer significantly if technology is used improperly or excessively [3]. Overreliance on digital platforms might result in losing focus on essential skills such as creativity, intuition, empathy, and practical problem-solving typically developed through traditional play. Children’s ability to interact with the real world might be hindered in a screen-dominated environment, impairing their capacity for critical thinking and original problem-solving. The absence of tactile inquiry and physical manipulation of things may constrain the variety and depth of experiences that support cognitive development. Educators and parents must respect this delicate balance and ensure that technology enhances rather than replaces crucial components of early childhood development. Encouragement of physical play, time spent outside, and other activities that appeal to all the senses regularly might lessen the likelihood of bad outcomes and promote a holistic development that includes both digital literacy and conventional cognitive abilities.
The effect of technology on the development of social skills is another crucial factor. According to Janisse et al. Piaget traditional play helps children develop their capacity for social cue understanding, emotional interpretation, and cooperative play [1]. Excessive screen usage might inhibit These crucial social skills, particularly when technology precedes connection with peers and adults. Lack of in-person engagement and face-to-face communication may compromise one’s ability to empathize, cooperate, and resolve conflicts later in life. Additionally, the prevalence of internet communication may impede children from completely understanding the subtleties of facial expressions, body language, and voice tones. Fostering well-rounded social skills requires balancing online and offline social contacts. By providing opportunities for family time, group activities, and social interactions with peers, parents may help their children develop their emotional intelligence and interpersonal skills while avoiding some potential drawbacks of relying too much on technology.
It is challenging to choose technology that supports a child’s developmental requirements [14]. Finding compelling information is important, but ensuring the content speaks to a child’s cognitive and psychological level is important. A mismatch between the kid’s demands and the technology’s capabilities might result from errors during this complex selection process. The difficulty is exacerbated by the deluge of material that is accessible, which ranges in quality and relevance. In addition to impeding academic and cognitive development, this mismatch may seriously affect emotional and psychological health [15]. The stakes are enormous; therefore, caretakers, educators, and developers must collaborate to ensure that technology is integrated into early childhood with the highest care, understanding, and compassion. Technology may be better matched to a person’s requirements with thorough evaluations, regular monitoring, and open communication among all parties [16]. Establishing an inclusive and engaging learning environment that values each child’s individuality is important to building a tech-savvy, well-rounded, resilient generation. This environment should embrace technology as a facilitator rather than a disruptor.
4.3. Strategies for Balancing Technology’s Impact
Striking the right balance in technology usage is essential to harness its positive effects while minimizing potential harm. To avoid misuse, reliance, and the accompanying negative impacts, moderation is essential, and thoughtful involvement with technology must be promoted [17]. However, exercising moderation does not simply mean setting time limits; it also means making sure that the time spent using technology is beneficial and age-appropriate. Children’s technology interactions may be strongly influenced by parental participation and direction, which can point them toward positive material that fits their developmental stage [16]. Simultaneously, to share responsibility for children’s technological education, parents and schools must work together to develop policies that support positive technology habits.
An essential aspect of balancing technology’s impact is to focus on the quality of content, not just the quantity of screen time. Technology may ally with cognitive development by emphasizing educational material such as learning applications, interactive e-books, and educational games [17]. Children’s technology can support learning rather than hinder it by offering screen time recommendations and advice on choosing age-appropriate and intellectually stimulating content. Ergonomics and physical health are also important. Proper posture, eye protection, and breaks may help kids avoid screen-related health problems. By implementing these ideas into their technology teaching and encouraging parents to do the same at home, schools may play a crucial role in fostering a culture of technology literacy.
Finally, strаtegies fоr bаlаncing teсhnology’s impаct must аlso encomраss broаder societаl аnd ethiсаl сonsiderаtions. As раrt оf this, kids should be taught аbout digitаl citizenshiр, onlinе sаfеty, аnd thе envirоnmentаl effeсts оf teсhnology. Children should lеаrn tо usе еmpаthy, аccountаbility, аnd сritiсаl thinking onlinе. Moreover, it is сritiсаl tо combаt thе digitаl divide. Community involvement, publiс рolicy, аnd educаtionаl аctivities аre nеcеssаry tо guаrаntee thаt аll kids hаve equitаble аccess tо teсhnology аnd thе pоssibilities it provides [18]. This cаn includes giving underрrivileged cоmmunities аccess tо gаdgets, thе intеrnеt, аnd digitаl literасy instruсtion. Strаtegies mаy guаrаntee thаt teсhnology serves аs а tоol fоr empоwerment аnd educаtion fоr аll children, regаrdless оf sоciо-ecоnоmic clаss, by аcknowledging аnd аddressing thеse discrepаncies.
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, several important findings emerged from the research on the complex relationship between early childhood cognitive development and technology. With its pervasiveness, technology has carved out new avenues for children’s reasoning, understanding, and thinking, serving as both an enabler and a disruptor. It has opened doors for innovation, worldwide connections, and specialized learning experiences but has also brought difficulties. Today’s world has positioned digital involvement as a need, not just a choice, for existence [19]. This implies that for the young, screens, apps, and digital interaction significantly impact their cognitive landscape, which, if left uncontrolled, might obstruct the natural processes of organic learning and human connection.
The research into this area exposed both the benefits and drawbacks of technology. When intelligently included in a child’s daily routine, it is evident that technology may inspire creativity, broaden perspectives, and facilitate self-paced learning. On the other hand, the hazards include less physical activity, fewer in-person connections with others, and a possible skewing of cognitive milestones due to an over-reliance on digital platforms. Nevertheless, despite how thorough it is, this research has several drawbacks. The results represent, in a way, a snapshot of a continually changing scene since technology is, by its very nature, dynamic and ever-evolving [19]. The influence on young brains of tools, platforms, and digital paradigms changes along with them.
There is a broad field of research in the future. Examining the implications of early digital integration would be a crucial area of research in the future. How do the early years of exposure to technology affect later-life cognitive and emotional trajectories? Are there latent impacts that manifest in adolescence or even adulthood? These investigations are essential. Deriving practical insights to balance technology and biological learning might also be a key research subject [20]. Consider it a work of harmonization: How can one ensure that the natural and the digital coexist, enhancing rather than displacing each other?
The difference between technology and education may become even more hard in the future. Artificial intelligence-driven instructional interfaces, virtual classrooms, and increased educational realities may soon become the rule rather than the exception [20]. All interested parties, educators, parents, technologists, and policymakers must work together to set the route as these frontiers open up. Everyone should make sure that when technology permeates the educational system, it does so in a way that emphasizes the child’s overall well-being. The ultimate objective is to effortlessly incorporate technology into education and maintain the fundamental principles of human-centric development in the digital age.
References
[1]. Seaba V. Revolutionizing Education-Exploring the Potential of AI-Enabled Brain-Based Learning for Enhanced Cognitive Development.
[2]. Alam, Ashraf. “Educational robotics and computer programming in early childhood education: a conceptual framework for assessing elementary school students’ computational thinking for designing powerful educational scenarios.” In 2022 International Conference on Smart Technologies and Systems for Next Generation Computing (ICSTSN), pp. 1-7. IEEE, 2022.
[3]. Chaparro J, Sojourner A, Wiswall MJ. Early childhood care and cognitive development. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2020 Mar 2.
[4]. Piaget, J. (2000). Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. Childhood cognitive development: The essential readings, 2, 33-47.
[5]. Fish, A. M., Li, X., McCarrick, K., Butler, S. T., Stanton, B., Brumitt, G. A., ... & Partridge, T. (2008). Early childhood computer experience and cognitive development among urban low-income pre-schoolers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 97-113.
[6]. Gottschalk F. Impacts of technology use on children: Exploring literature on the brain, cognition, and well-being.
[7]. Kim, J. (2020). Learning and teaching online during Covid-19: Experiences of student teachers in an early childhood education practicum. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52(2), 145-158.
[8]. Xu, T., & Zhang, B. (2021). Improving thinking skills in early childhood using effective teaching strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 101704.
[9]. Donohue, C. (2003). Technology in early childhood education. Child Care Information Exchange, 154, 17-22.
[10]. Vedechkina, M., & Borgonovi, F. (2021). A review of evidence on digital technology’s role in shaping children’s attention and cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 611155.
[11]. Keengwe, J., & Onchwari, G. (2009). Technology and early childhood education: A technology integration professional development model for practicing teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 209-218.
[12]. Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2014). Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers & Education, 77, 82-90.
[13]. Blut, M., & Wang, C. (2020). Technology readiness: a meta-analysis of conceptualizations of the construct and its impact on technology usage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 649-669.
[14]. Nir-Gal, O., & Klein, P. S. (2004). Computers for cognitive development in early childhood—the teacher’s role in the computer learning environment. Information technology in childhood education annual, 2004(1), 97-119.
[15]. Ogegbo, A. A., & Aina, A. (2020). Early childhood development teachers’ perceptions on the use of technology in teaching young children. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 10(1), 1-10.
[16]. Kim, S., Connerton, T. P., & Park, C. (2021). Exploring the impact of technological disruptions in the automotive retail: A future studies and systems thinking approach based on causal layered analysis and causal loop diagram. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121024.
[17]. Romero, E., López-Romero, L., Domínguez-Álvarez, B., Villar, P., & Gómez-Fraguela, J. A. (2020). Testing the effects of COVID-19 confinement in Spanish children: The role of parents’ distress, emotional problems, and specific parenting. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(19), 6975.
[18]. Mahmood, T., & Mubarik, M. S. (2020). Balancing innovation and exploitation in the fourth industrial revolution: Role of intellectual capital and technology absorptive capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120248.
[19]. Janisse, H. C., Li, X., Bhavnagri, N. P., Esposito, C., & Stanton, B. (2018). A longitudinal study of the effect of computers on the cognitive development of low-income African American preschool children. Early Education and Development, 29(2), 229-244.
[20]. Koç, K. (2014). The use of technology in early childhood classrooms: An investigation of teachers’ attitudes. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 13(3), 807-819.
Cite this article
Ren,Y. (2023). The Impact of Technology on Cognitive Development in Early Childhood. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,23,293-300.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Seaba V. Revolutionizing Education-Exploring the Potential of AI-Enabled Brain-Based Learning for Enhanced Cognitive Development.
[2]. Alam, Ashraf. “Educational robotics and computer programming in early childhood education: a conceptual framework for assessing elementary school students’ computational thinking for designing powerful educational scenarios.” In 2022 International Conference on Smart Technologies and Systems for Next Generation Computing (ICSTSN), pp. 1-7. IEEE, 2022.
[3]. Chaparro J, Sojourner A, Wiswall MJ. Early childhood care and cognitive development. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2020 Mar 2.
[4]. Piaget, J. (2000). Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. Childhood cognitive development: The essential readings, 2, 33-47.
[5]. Fish, A. M., Li, X., McCarrick, K., Butler, S. T., Stanton, B., Brumitt, G. A., ... & Partridge, T. (2008). Early childhood computer experience and cognitive development among urban low-income pre-schoolers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 97-113.
[6]. Gottschalk F. Impacts of technology use on children: Exploring literature on the brain, cognition, and well-being.
[7]. Kim, J. (2020). Learning and teaching online during Covid-19: Experiences of student teachers in an early childhood education practicum. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52(2), 145-158.
[8]. Xu, T., & Zhang, B. (2021). Improving thinking skills in early childhood using effective teaching strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 101704.
[9]. Donohue, C. (2003). Technology in early childhood education. Child Care Information Exchange, 154, 17-22.
[10]. Vedechkina, M., & Borgonovi, F. (2021). A review of evidence on digital technology’s role in shaping children’s attention and cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 611155.
[11]. Keengwe, J., & Onchwari, G. (2009). Technology and early childhood education: A technology integration professional development model for practicing teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 209-218.
[12]. Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2014). Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers & Education, 77, 82-90.
[13]. Blut, M., & Wang, C. (2020). Technology readiness: a meta-analysis of conceptualizations of the construct and its impact on technology usage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 649-669.
[14]. Nir-Gal, O., & Klein, P. S. (2004). Computers for cognitive development in early childhood—the teacher’s role in the computer learning environment. Information technology in childhood education annual, 2004(1), 97-119.
[15]. Ogegbo, A. A., & Aina, A. (2020). Early childhood development teachers’ perceptions on the use of technology in teaching young children. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 10(1), 1-10.
[16]. Kim, S., Connerton, T. P., & Park, C. (2021). Exploring the impact of technological disruptions in the automotive retail: A future studies and systems thinking approach based on causal layered analysis and causal loop diagram. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121024.
[17]. Romero, E., López-Romero, L., Domínguez-Álvarez, B., Villar, P., & Gómez-Fraguela, J. A. (2020). Testing the effects of COVID-19 confinement in Spanish children: The role of parents’ distress, emotional problems, and specific parenting. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(19), 6975.
[18]. Mahmood, T., & Mubarik, M. S. (2020). Balancing innovation and exploitation in the fourth industrial revolution: Role of intellectual capital and technology absorptive capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120248.
[19]. Janisse, H. C., Li, X., Bhavnagri, N. P., Esposito, C., & Stanton, B. (2018). A longitudinal study of the effect of computers on the cognitive development of low-income African American preschool children. Early Education and Development, 29(2), 229-244.
[20]. Koç, K. (2014). The use of technology in early childhood classrooms: An investigation of teachers’ attitudes. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 13(3), 807-819.