
A Pragmatic Analysis of Hedges in English Economic News: Taking the Financial Times as an Example
- 1 Columbia University in the City of New York
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Since Professor L. A. Zadeh put forward the vagueness theory in 1965, a growing number of scholars have used it as a theoretical basis for preliminary discussions on the fuzzy phenomenon in many fields. However, there are not many studies on the analysis of the fuzzy phenomenon in news, especially the study of hedges in English economic news is yet to be enriched. Economic news plays an important role in people's daily lives. Economic news requires accuracy, objectivity, and conciseness, as well as acceptability and politeness. It seems to imply that hedges cannot exist in English economic news. However, the use of hedges in economic news can precisely achieve these purposes. To prove that there are a large number of hedges in economic news and that hedges play an important role in strengthening the credibility of news, avoiding giving details, achieving politeness, and enhancing self-protection, I take the news from the Financial Times as the source and explores the pragmatic function of hedges in English economic news and its specific application by combining the classification of hedges from the perspective of pragmatics, namely, strengthening the credibility, avoiding giving details, enhancing self-protecting and achieving politeness. By analyzing these results, the author hopes to contribute to the further development of economic news theory in English and also to help readers better grasp the essentials of economic news writing.
Keywords
hedges, pragmatic analysis, pragmatic functions, economic news, the Financial Times
[1]. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[2]. Channell, J. (1994). Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[3]. Jensen, J. D. (2008). Scientific Uncertainty in News Coverage of Cancer Research: Effects of Hedging on Scientists’ and Journalists’ Credibility. Human Communication Research, 34(3), 347-369.
[4]. Yang, Y. (2013). Exploring linguistic and cultural variations in the use of hedges in English and Chinese scientific discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 50(1), 23-36.
[5]. Wu, T. P. (1999). Fuzzy Linguistics. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
[6]. Chen, Y. (2000). Fuzzy restrictive language in verbal communication and its pragmatic functions. Journal of Xiangtan Normal University, (4), 135-137.
[7]. Sun, S. (2008). A pragmatic study of vague restrictive language in English news (Master's thesis). Hebei Normal University.
[8]. Luo, Z. (2008). An analysis of vague restrictive language and its pragmatic functions in English economic news (Master's thesis). Nanjing Normal University.
[9]. Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society Papers, 3, 183-228.
[10]. Prince, E., Frader, J., & Bosk, C. (1982). On Hedging in Physician-Physician Discourse. In R. J. Di Pietro (Ed.), Linguistics and the Professions. Amsterdam: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
[11]. Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.
Cite this article
Han,J. (2024). A Pragmatic Analysis of Hedges in English Economic News: Taking the Financial Times as an Example. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,37,225-234.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Psychology and Humanity Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).