Bridging the Digital Divide in Mental Health: An Innovation Diffusion-Based Framework for Advancing Digital Literacy among Professionals

Research Article
Open access

Bridging the Digital Divide in Mental Health: An Innovation Diffusion-Based Framework for Advancing Digital Literacy among Professionals

Jie Shi 1*
  • 1 University of Melbourne    
  • *corresponding author js19980924@gmail.com
Published on 15 January 2024 | https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/38/20240587
LNEP Vol.38
ISSN (Print): 2753-7056
ISSN (Online): 2753-7048
ISBN (Print): 978-1-83558-277-0
ISBN (Online): 978-1-83558-278-7

Abstract

The heightened prominence of digital literacy, as emphasized in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), signifies a collective effort to address the pressing need for reducing the digital divide. Digital literacy involves adept utilization of information and communication technologies, encompassing both technical expertise and cognitive skills. This research focuses on identifying optimal conceptual approaches and measurement standards for digital literacy, concurrently developing an evidence-based tool to elucidate the essential digital literacy prerequisites for mental health professionals advocating mobile mental health applications. The study draws theoretical inspiration from the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT), guiding the formulation of a foundational framework for digital literacy prerequisites among mental health professionals and the strategic crafting of diffusion strategies. The methodological approach entails a meticulous literature review, with a specific emphasis on the Google Scholar database, to identify best practices for evaluating digital literacy among mental health professionals. Four frameworks were deliberately chosen for comprehensive analysis, unraveling associated methodologies and measurement standards. The insights derived from this analysis inform the development of an evaluation framework aligned with the five stages of the Innovation Diffusion Theory: awareness, interest, evaluation, trial, and adoption. The G20 Digital Literacy simplified model, among the selected frameworks, serves as the cornerstone for the developed evaluation framework. This model intricately delineates the digital literacy and competencies required for mental health professionals at various stages of endorsing mobile mental health applications. Importantly, it adopts a professional-centric model, deviating from conventional approaches, providing a unique perspective on the pivotal role professionals play in propagating and endorsing digital applications.

Keywords:

Digital literacy, Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT), Mental health professionals, Mobile mental health applications, G20 Digital Literacy model

Shi,J. (2024). Bridging the Digital Divide in Mental Health: An Innovation Diffusion-Based Framework for Advancing Digital Literacy among Professionals. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,38,53-65.
Export citation

1. Introduction

The Global Observatory for eHealth (GOe) of the World Health Organization (WHO) delineates mHealth as the convergence of medical and public health practices leveraging mobile devices [1]. Given the ubiquity of mobile phone ownership, encompassing approximately 2.5 billion individuals worldwide, mHealth stands poised to furnish unparalleled access to specialized clinical diagnostics and treatment guidance [2]. Notably, within this landscape, the emergence of mobile applications concentrated on mental health assumes a pivotal developmental trajectory. These applications serve as invaluable assets, particularly for individuals grappling with mental health afflictions who may eschew traditional healthcare avenues due to sentiments of shame or apprehension. Nevertheless, it is imperative to acknowledge that the adoption of mobile applications in the realm of mental health and therapy lags behind other health-centric counterparts [3]. Consequently, mental health professionals emerge as instrumental figures in this domain, prompting a critical research inquiry into how these professionals can efficaciously contribute to steering mental health mHealth applications from their nascent stages to widespread embrace.

Inherent to the digital milieu, the utilization of mHealth mandates a certain degree of digital literacy among its end-users. The recent United Nations report on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) underscores the imperative of augmenting digital literacy through educational initiatives and lifelong learning to navigate the perpetual evolution of the digital landscape [4]. Thus, this research undertakes the foundational query: How can this study delineate a framework for the digital literacy of mental health professionals? Recognizing mHealth as an innovative entity, the investigation incorporates the tenets of the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT) into the analysis of its dissemination pathways. This integration seeks to explicitly demarcate the multifaceted components of digital literacy essential for mental health professionals to meaningfully contribute to the proliferation and assimilation of mental health mHealth applications. By adopting this methodological approach, the study aims to cultivate a nuanced comprehension of the indispensable roles and requisite skills of mental health professionals in advancing the cause of mHealth applications within the sphere of mental health.

2. Literature Review

This paper aims to conduct a thorough examination of pertinent research and theoretical frameworks through a comprehensive literature review. This approach serves to establish the contextual underpinnings of the present study and discern lacunae within the existing research landscape. The initial section of the paper will furnish an introduction to mental health mobile applications, succeeded by a focused discourse on digital literacy. Within this discourse, specific emphasis will be placed on delineating the deficiencies in the digital literacy skill set of mental health professionals, particularly in the context of advancing mental health mobile applications. Subsequently, the study will delve into the Innovation Diffusion Theory, elucidating the theoretical framework. Noteworthy is the pioneering aspect of this investigation, which marks the first instance of integrating the Innovation Diffusion Theory with the realm of digital literacy. In the final section, the paper will explore the synergistic integration of these two pivotal concepts, addressing extant theoretical lacunae. This synthesis endeavors to contribute to the theoretical framework surrounding the effective involvement of mental health professionals in promoting and facilitating the widespread acceptance of mental health mobile applications. The delineation of this structured approach will enhance the scholarly discourse on the intersection of digital literacy and innovation diffusion within the specialized context of mental health applications.

2.1. Mental Health Mobile Application

Mobile health applications, commonly referred to as mobile apps, are software programs specifically designed for use on smartphones and tablet devices [5]. These apps are created with the primary aim of providing content and functionalities intended to promote well-being and health. Within the field of mobile health applications, there exists a distinct category known as mental health apps, which are tailored to support various aspects of mental well-being [6]. These include functions related to assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and management of mental health concerns. Furthermore, these applications serve as tools for promoting overall health and mindfulness, offering features such as guided meditation and relaxation exercises.

Certain mental health apps go beyond their traditional role of providing general health support, extending their capabilities to include diagnostic functions. These diagnostic features play a crucial role in evaluating and diagnosing an individual's mental health condition. For instance, the work of Robert and colleagues exemplifies the application of computer-adaptive diagnostic screening and testing methods to detect the presence and severity of mental health disorders such as depression, anxiety, and mania. This approach effectively calibrates the information contained within extensive repositories comprising hundreds of symptom items. It further allows for the precise extraction of information from these extensive repositories using adaptive management involving a subset of symptom items [7]. Moreover, these applications offer valuable assistance tailored to specific mental health conditions by providing resources for treatment and therapeutic support to users.

A particularly noteworthy digital tool is SPARX [8], developed by Theresa Fleming and her team, which has garnered significant support for its role in addressing mental health issues. This program employs a format reminiscent of a gaming experience, comprising seven modules, each requiring approximately 30 minutes to complete. These modules are designed to deliver core content rooted in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). User feedback underscores the appeal of the SPARX format, including the sensation of personalized guidance, the captivating narrative structure, and the sense of exploration it fosters, all while providing users with a sense of control. Applications similar to SPARX have the potential to significantly enhance mental health care and disease prevention. However, their successful adoption and widespread use depend on various factors, with one key factor being the digital literacy of mental health professionals. In particular, the enhancement of digital literacy among counselor educators and professional associations plays a critical role in facilitating the effective dissemination of innovative mental health mobile apps throughout the entire mental health care system [9].

2.2. Digital Literacy

Digital literacy is a concept initially proposed by Paul Gilster in his eponymous work [10]. Gilster defined digital literacy as the capacity of individuals to comprehend and effectively utilize information from various digital sources, rather than simply enumerating specific abilities, competencies, or skills. He underscored that digital literacy embodies an individual's ability to navigate the information landscape in the digital age, representing a comprehensive skillset beyond mere proficiency in digital tools.

In recent years, digital literacy has garnered increasing attention and research within the field of healthcare. For instance, Slevin et al. have pointed out the significant challenges faced by healthcare professionals in managing conditions like Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), often experiencing a sense of powerlessness and frustration in their treatment of patients [11]. This underscores the critical importance of digital literacy, particularly in the realm of mental health. Tracy et al. argue that understanding various aspects of digital psychiatry has become an essential contemporary requirement for clinicians and healthcare organizations [12]. This entails not only a profound comprehension of digital tools and technologies but also the proficient application of these resources to effectively promote and leverage mental health mobile applications.

However, the existing body of literature has distinctly highlighted a notable research gap concerning the precise components of digital literacy when evaluating mental health professionals. Notably, Tyler et al. [13] introduced the "Seven Abilities of technically literate health professionals" framework, serving as the foundation for the analytical framework in this study. Furthermore, a dearth of research explores the implications of this digital literacy on their efficacy in promoting mental health mobile applications. This knowledge void is of paramount significance in contemporary digital healthcare practices, as digital literacy plays a pivotal role in ensuring that professionals can adeptly leverage new technological tools.

2.3. Innovation Diffusion Theory

The Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT), initially introduced by Everett Rogers in his seminal work "Diffusion of Innovations" [14], has since been further refined. According to Rogers' definition, innovation refers to ideas, practices, or objects that individuals or adopting entities perceive as novel. The core focus of the Innovation Diffusion Theory is to understand how, why, and at what rate these novel ideas and technologies spread within social systems [15]. Furthermore, Rogers and Shoemaker [14] identified five key stages in the diffusion process, which include awareness, interests, evaluation, trial, and adoption (refer to Figure 1). The theory suggests that when an innovation is in its early stages, its acceptance is low, and the number of users is limited, leading to a relatively slow diffusion process. However, when the proportion of users reaches a critical threshold, the innovation diffusion process accelerates rapidly. The adoption of new innovations is influenced by factors such as interpersonal relationships and regular exposure to mass communication.

/word/media/image1.png

Figure 1: Rogers' Innovation Diffusion Model [14]

In recent years, IDT has found extensive applications in researching the adoption and dissemination of new technologies. For example, Yi-Hsuan Lee and colleagues incorporated IDT with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to investigate the factors shaping business employees' behavioral intentions towards the utilization of e-learning systems, leading to the development of an extended TAM [16].

However, within the evolving landscape of mental health, characterized by the rapid proliferation of mHealth and concurrent advancements in healthcare systems, a discernible lacuna in research becomes evident. Specifically, there exists a dearth of investigations that amalgamate the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT) with the intricate concept of digital literacy. This conspicuous theoretical gap highlights an under-explored terrain where limited attention has been directed towards elucidating the manner in which mental health professionals leverage digital literacy in the advocacy of mobile mental health applications, and correspondingly, how these applications are shaped by the tenets of the Innovation Diffusion Theory. Consequently, the integration of these two foundational concepts emerges as imperative, promising the formulation of a bespoke digital literacy framework tailored explicitly for mental health professionals. This synthesis not only addresses the identified theoretical gap but also delves into the nuanced dynamics governing the adoption processes of mental health applications. The amalgamation of digital literacy and Innovation Diffusion Theory in this study assumes paramount significance as it has the potential to engender the creation of a more comprehensive theoretical framework, offering practical guidance for the effective promotion of mental health applications. By doing so, this research endeavors to equip mental health technology professionals with enhanced capabilities to proficiently advocate for and utilize new digital tools, thereby augmenting the overall delivery of psychological healthcare and treatment to patients. In effect, the envisioned outcome is an elevation in the proficiency and efficacy of mental health professionals in navigating the contemporary intersection of digital technologies and psychological healthcare.

3. Methodology

3.1. Search Strategy

This research executed an extensive literature search within the Google Scholar database, endeavoring to discern pertinent literature germane to the formulation of a digital literacy measurement framework. Concurrently, the exploration aimed to identify reports delineating noteworthy international examples of existing frameworks. The search strategy adopted encompassed a spectrum of keywords, ranging from broad terms such as "evaluation" and "digital literacy" to more specific terms like "mental health professionals" and "mental health mobile applications." The deliberate inclusion of these specific terms was paramount, given the nuanced nature of digital literacy within the domains of mental health and mobile healthcare applications, where it is often characterized by individualized levels rather than a universal progression. Notably, "mHealth" was employed as a strategic proxy term, symbolizing mobile healthcare applications, in recognition of the intricate relationship between digital literacy and the maturation of these applications. The literature search process entailed meticulous filtering for relevance to mental health and professionals. It is noteworthy that the research design intentionally embraced a broad search strategy to comprehensively capture all evaluation literature pertaining to digital maturity, whether confined to a specific healthcare setting or spanning diverse healthcare pathways. The temporal scope of the search spanned from 2008 to 2023, encapsulating a timeframe conducive to encapsulating the evolution of digital literacy within the designated context. Four distinct Boolean search strings were deployed in this pursuit: (1) "evaluation" and "digital literacy," (2) "mental health professionals" and "diffusion," (3) "mHealth" and "Innovation Diffusion Theory," and (4) "mental health professionals" and "digital literacy." This deliberate and systematic approach to literature retrieval forms the methodological backbone of this research, ensuring a comprehensive exploration of the intersection between digital literacy, mental health professionals, and the diffusion of innovative mHealth applications.

3.2. Review Strategy

The search strategy yielded over 100 papers in order to identify the most suitable digital literacy framework. However, the majority of these papers were either irrelevant to the objectives of this review or did not contribute to a deeper understanding of the digital literacy framework. The inclusion criteria explicitly specified that papers must be relevant to mental health professionals and mHealth, with a specific emphasis on the components of the digital literacy framework, such as information or computer literacy. Papers were excluded if they solely discussed experiences or outcomes related to digital literacy without focusing on the framework itself. Additionally, papers that solely reported evaluation results without providing methodological insights were also excluded. The figure below (Figure 2) presents the four digital literacy frameworks that were selected after a thorough literature review and screening, along with their descriptions and contents.

/word/media/image2.png

Figure 2: Literature search and review strategy

3.3. Analysis and Framework Development

The examination of identified papers in this study aimed at elucidating their contributions to the construction of a digital literacy framework. This entailed a meticulous analysis to discern insights into the assessment of digital literacy, the factors deemed essential for measurement, and the optimal timing for conducting assessments. Drawing upon the outcomes derived from the comprehensive literature search and review, the research proceeded to synthesize these insights into a coherent framework. Throughout the analytical process, the study distilled five overarching themes, aligning with the five stages delineated in the Innovation Diffusion Theory. These themes were subsequently translated into distinct levels within the framework, with each level incorporating various facets informed by the G20 Digital Literacy simplified model [17]. A noteworthy departure from existing digital literacy measurement methodologies is the focal point of the resulting framework, which revolves around mental health professionals. This framework systematically gauges each level at significant junctures along the innovation diffusion pathway. This methodological innovation stands in contrast to extant digital literacy measurement approaches, which are often tethered to service-specific objectives, thereby constraining their efficacy in fostering comprehensive enhancements across the entirety of the innovation diffusion pathway. The resultant framework, emerging from the integration of insights garnered from both the Innovation Diffusion Theory and the G20 Digital Literacy model, holds promise in providing a nuanced and holistic approach to the assessment and augmentation of digital literacy among mental health professionals.

4. Result

In the course of this research, a meticulous analysis of findings extracted from 19 identified papers in the literature search was undertaken. Ultimately, the decision was made to ground the research framework (Table 1) on the G20 Digital Literacy Simplified Model [18]. This selection was motivated by the model's alignment with the requisite five stages outlined by the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT), thereby harmonizing with the foundational context essential for the digital literacy concept. The categorization of these papers into five themes, reflective of the five stages of IDT—namely Awareness, Interest, Evaluation, Trial, and Adoption—was pivotal in elucidating the varying degrees of emphasis accorded to each stage in the extant literature. Subsequently, in the forthcoming discussion, an in-depth exploration of these themes will be conducted, accompanied by a detailed presentation of pertinent indicators gleaned from the literature. An awareness of this contextual background proves instrumental in informing the development of the evaluation framework. It is noteworthy that while these themes encompass diverse dimensions, a significant observation is the prevalent absence of a mental health professional-centric perspective in the majority of the examined papers. Instead, the focus often gravitated towards other groups such as teachers and healthcare personnel. This implies that the evaluations were predominantly confined to specific environments, with only a limited acknowledgment of the unique considerations pertinent to mental health professionals. Despite occasional recognition of the significance of specific indicators for healthcare professionals, a conspicuous void exists in discussions addressing how evaluations encompass success across the entirety of the innovation diffusion pathway. This underscores the critical gap in the literature that this research seeks to address through the development of a comprehensive evaluation framework tailored specifically to the digital literacy needs of mental health professionals.

Table 1: G20 Digital Literacy simplified model

Dimension

Perspective

Cognitive

Technical

Ethical

Information (Digital Content)

Synthesis

Access, Usage

Appropriate

Usage

Computer

(Hardware and software)

Evaluate

Usage

Appropriate

Usage

Media

(Text, sound, image, video,

social)

Critique, Create

Navigation

Assess truthfulness

Communication

(non-linear interaction)

Critique, Create

Develop and use content

Appropriate Usage

Technology

(Tools for life situations)

Invent, evaluate tools

Usage

Appropriate usage

Consequently, this study will leverage the identified five stages as the foundational framework for conceptualizing the digital literacy of mental health professionals. The intent is to scrutinize how mental health professionals traverse these stages, encompassing their comprehension of the significance of digital literacy, generation of interest, assessment of practical value, experimentation, and ultimately, adoption and promotion of the use of mental health mobile applications. The pivotal factors in this dynamic process include information, computing, media, communication, and technology. The synthesized framework is visually represented in Figure 3 below. By anchoring this framework within the context of the Innovation Diffusion Theory, this research endeavors to gain a deeper understanding and facilitate the augmentation and application of digital literacy among mental health professionals. This strategic alignment with the Innovation Diffusion Theory serves as a guiding paradigm to comprehensively navigate the challenges presented by the digital environment. Furthermore, it is anticipated that this holistic theoretical framework will not only contribute to the professional growth and efficacy of mental health practitioners but also catalyze innovation and development within the broader field. This strategic integration of theoretical underpinnings is positioned to propel the sustainable advancement of the field, aligning with the imperatives of contemporary digital landscapes.

/word/media/image3.png

Figure 3: A framework of Digital literacy prerequisites for mental health professionals

4.1. Awareness

In this stage, mental health professionals need to possess digital literacy (computer skills), which includes an understanding of basic digital concepts such as applications and online resources, to become aware of the existence and functionality of mental health applications. Simultaneously, they also need to know how to seek and discern information related to mental health applications, encompassing aspects of information literacy, to ensure that they can access accurate and relevant resources. Furthermore, mental health professionals should have scientific literacy to comprehend the concepts and theoretical foundations of these applications, enabling them to better assess their practical applications and benefits. This entails having fundamental scientific thinking skills to analyze and evaluate the scientific basis of these applications. Without these competencies in digital, information, and scientific literacy, there is a possibility of overlooking the potential significance of these applications, underscoring the importance of this stage within their professional domain.

4.2. Interests

In this stage, mental health professionals should cultivate a strong interest in the potential benefits of these applications, emphasizing the crucial understanding of the possibilities offered by these digital tools. The role of technological literacy becomes paramount in this process, as it enables professionals to gain in-depth insights into these applications and digital tools, recognizing their value and significance. Additionally, digital literacy is of vital importance at this stage. Mental health professionals must further deepen their comprehension of applications and digital tools to better grasp their potential benefits. Furthermore, information literacy is also essential. Professionals should actively monitor and stay updated on the latest developments and trends in mental health applications, ensuring they keep pace with this rapidly evolving field. Moreover, innovative literacy is indispensable as it empowers them to identify and appreciate the innovations within these applications and anticipate their potential impact on the field of mental health.

4.3. Evaluation

Mental health professionals must rigorously assess these applications for their reliability, effectiveness, and safety, adhering to the highest standards. In this evaluation process, the role of technological literacy is of paramount importance, as it equips professionals with a profound understanding of digital skills, enabling them to accurately evaluate the quality and practicality of these tools. Technological literacy provides them with the capability to judge the reliability and effectiveness of applications, ensuring that these tools not only adhere to rational standards but also meet professional criteria. Additionally, information literacy is indispensable, as mental health professionals need to be able to find and interpret research and user feedback related to these applications. Understanding the actual effects of applications and user experiences is a critical component of assessing their effectiveness. Lastly, data literacy is equally vital, as it allows professionals to comprehend how to analyze the data generated by these applications to evaluate their effectiveness. Proficiency in data analysis aids in revealing the performance and potential issues of applications in real-world applications.

4.4. Trail

Professionals need to possess technological literacy as they explore these applications and learn how to use them effectively, as it is a crucial element in ensuring their correct and efficient utilization. Technological literacy enables them to operate applications, providing support and training to patients or clients, ensuring they can fully benefit from these digital tools. In addition to technological literacy, communication literacy is equally vital. Professionals must be capable of clearly conveying the value and usage methods of these applications to patients or clients. This involves effective communication skills, allowing patients or clients to comprehend and use these applications rationally, thus enhancing their mental well-being. Furthermore, security literacy is indispensable, as professionals need to understand how to maintain data privacy and ensure the security of the applications. This is critical in protecting patient or client information while guaranteeing that these applications do not adversely affect their privacy rights.

4.5. Adoption

Mental health professionals play a critical role in deciding whether to adopt these applications and promote them to their patients or clients. This decision involves multiple factors, including innovation literacy, meaning that professionals must be able to assess the potential benefits of these applications for patients or clients and determine whether to adopt them. They need to scrutinize the characteristics of the applications to ensure they can provide effective support to patients or clients. Additionally, promotional literacy (media usage and information integration promotion capabilities) is equally vital, as professionals must understand how to effectively promote these applications. This involves establishing partnerships, devising promotional strategies, and ensuring that patients or clients are aware of the potential of these digital tools. Promotion involves a comprehensive promotional plan to ensure widespread acceptance of these applications. Finally, legal and ethical literacy is equally indispensable. Professionals must comply with legal regulations and ethical guidelines, ensuring that they do not violate the privacy rights and interests of patients or clients when promoting applications. This entails understanding relevant laws and ethical guidelines and ensuring the legality and ethics of promotional activities.

5. Discussion

5.1. Strategies Proposed

The articulated framework above aspires to furnish a comprehensive model delineating the digital literacy of mental health professionals, positioning them as central figures within the digital landscape. The primary objective is to encapsulate the diffusion trajectory of mobile mental health applications and explicate how mental health professionals employ distinct levels of digital literacy across diverse stages of dissemination. This, in turn, substantively impacts the adoption and advocacy of these applications within their professional domain. Derived from the multifaceted digital skills and literacies outlined within the framework, this study proposes a series of strategic interventions, as illustrated in Figure 4. These strategies are conceived to empower mental health professionals with the requisite digital competencies and insights to navigate the intricacies of the digital environment. Through a targeted implementation of these strategies, mental health professionals can not only enhance their digital literacy but also catalyze a more robust adoption and promotion of mobile mental health applications. The symbiotic relationship between the proposed strategies and the digital literacy framework is poised to fortify the role of mental health professionals as key catalysts in the integration and advancement of digital technologies within their specialized domain.

/word/media/image4.png

Figure 4: Strategies Proposed

5.2. Limitations

It is unlikely that Google Scholar excluded any relevant sources; however, it is possible to supplement the results of the literature review by searching in other databases. Moreover, it is important to consider that some relevant resources may be found in the less easily identifiable gray literature. Additionally, despite expanding the search terms to be as inclusive as possible, there may still be a bias towards the application of digital literacy within the five stages of Innovation Diffusion Theory, particularly in the context of information exchange. It is worth noting that this framework is specifically tailored to digital literacy for mental health professionals, which limits its applicability to a narrower audience. Furthermore, the framework primarily focuses on the dissemination of mobile mental health applications and may not comprehensively consider other modes of dissemination, thus having certain limitations.

6. Future Directions

While the developed framework provides a valuable contribution to understanding digital literacy among mental health professionals and its application in the dissemination of mobile mental health applications, there are several avenues for future research and development.

6.1. Assessment of the Framework

Conducting empirical studies to evaluate the framework's effectiveness and usability would be an essential next step. This could involve testing the framework in real-world scenarios to validate its practicality and potential impact on enhancing digital literacy among healthcare professionals.

6.2. Expansion to Diverse Healthcare Professionals

To enhance the applicability of the framework, future research can explore extending it to various healthcare professionals beyond mental health specialists. This extension would enable a broader audience to benefit from improved digital literacy specific to their respective domains, leading to more effective healthcare delivery.

6.3. Digital Maturity Across the Patient Journey

Expanding the framework's focus to assess digital maturity throughout the entire patient journey, rather than just professional practice, can provide a more comprehensive understanding of how digital literacy impacts healthcare outcomes. This broader perspective could lead to improved patient care and experiences.

7. Conclusion

In the realm of digital literacy, as a comprehensive advancement geared towards specific domains with a primary focus on particular groups, this concept has seen substantial practical implementation in various fields, such as the education sector, where assessment frameworks primarily revolve around educators. However, within the domains of mental health and the promotion of mobile mental health applications, the progress of digital literacy is predominantly assessed through the evaluation of individual services or environmental performances. This approach not only falls short of providing a comprehensive overview of digital literacy but, more critically, it fails to indicate whether novel digital applications can offer assistance and influence at various critical junctures in the innovative dissemination pathway.

In order to facilitate the promotion of digital technology advancements in the field of mental health and, consequently, promote the interests of mental health professionals in health coordination and information enhancement, digital literacy needs to be conceptualized as an industry-wide, professional-centric metric. This study draws on existing theories regarding the measurement of the various components of digital literacy, best practices for collecting indicators of its components, and examples of existing assessment frameworks to propose a contemporary framework. This framework spans five critical levels of digital literacy along the dissemination pathway of mobile mental health applications in the field of mental health, elucidating how digital literacy can be most meaningfully enhanced.


References

[1]. Ryu, S. (2012). Book review: mHealth: new horizons for health through mobile technologies: based on the findings of the second global survey on eHealth (global observatory for eHealth series, volume 3). Healthcare Informatics Research, 18(3), 231-233.

[2]. Rowland, S. P., Fitzgerald, J. E., Holme, T., Powell, J., & McGregor, A. (2020). What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients?. NPJ digital medicine, 3(1), 4.

[3]. Carlo, A. D., Hosseini Ghomi, R., Renn, B. N., & Areán, P. A. (2019). By the numbers: ratings and utilization of behavioral health mobile applications. NPJ digital medicine, 2(1), 54.

[4]. Hanemann, U., & Robinson, C. (2022). Rethinking literacy from a lifelong learning perspective in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals and the International Conference on Adult Education. International Review of Education, 68(2), 233-258.

[5]. Ventola, C. L. (2014). Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 39(5), 356.

[6]. Agarwal, S., Jalan, M., Wilcox, H. C., Sharma, R., Hill, R., Pantalone, E., ... & Robinson, K. A. (2022). Evaluation of mental health mobile applications.

[7]. Gibbons, R. D., Weiss, D. J., Frank, E., & Kupfer, D. (2016). Computerized adaptive diagnosis and testing of mental health disorders. Annual review of clinical psychology, 12, 83-104.

[8]. Fleming, T., Lucassen, M., Stasiak, K., Sutcliffe, K., & Merry, S. (2021). Technology Matters: SPARX–computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for adolescent depression in a game format. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 26(1), 92-94.

[9]. East, M. L., & Havard, B. C. (2015). Mental health mobile apps: from infusion to diffusion in the mental health social system. JMIR mental health, 2(1), e3954.

[10]. Gilster, P., & Glister, P. (1997). Digital literacy (p. 1). New York: Wiley Computer Pub.

[11]. Slevin, P., Kessie, T., Cullen, J., Butler, M. W., Donnelly, S. C., & Caulfield, B. (2020). Exploring the barriers and facilitators for the use of digital health technologies for the management of COPD: a qualitative study of clinician perceptions. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 113(3), 163-172.

[12]. Tracy, D. K., Gadelrab, R., Rahim, A., Pendlebury, G., Reza, H., Bhattacharya, R., ... & Dave, S. (2022). Digital literacy in contemporary mental healthcare: online assessments and mobile health apps. BJPsych Advances, 1-9.

[13]. Tyler, J. M., & Sabella, R. A. (2004). Using technology to improve counseling practice: A primer for the 21st century.

[14]. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. Third edition. New York. Free Press

[15]. Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. First edition. New York. Free Press

[16]. Lee, Y. H., Hsieh, Y. C., & Hsu, C. N. (2011). Adding innovation diffusion theory to the technology acceptance model: Supporting employees' intentions to use e-learning systems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 124-137.

[17]. Chetty, K., Aneja, U., Mishra, V., Gcora, N., & Josie, J. (2018). Bridging the digital divide in the G20: skills for the new age. Economics, 12(1), 20180024.

[18]. Fanea-Ivanovici, M., & Lee, Y. T. (2022). An Overview of Digital Literacy Frameworks: Focus on the Digital Literacy Framework (CDL). Available at SSRN 4088293.


Cite this article

Shi,J. (2024). Bridging the Digital Divide in Mental Health: An Innovation Diffusion-Based Framework for Advancing Digital Literacy among Professionals. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,38,53-65.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Psychology and Humanity Studies

ISBN:978-1-83558-277-0(Print) / 978-1-83558-278-7(Online)
Editor:Kurt Buhring
Conference website: https://www.icsphs.org/
Conference date: 1 March 2024
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.38
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Ryu, S. (2012). Book review: mHealth: new horizons for health through mobile technologies: based on the findings of the second global survey on eHealth (global observatory for eHealth series, volume 3). Healthcare Informatics Research, 18(3), 231-233.

[2]. Rowland, S. P., Fitzgerald, J. E., Holme, T., Powell, J., & McGregor, A. (2020). What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients?. NPJ digital medicine, 3(1), 4.

[3]. Carlo, A. D., Hosseini Ghomi, R., Renn, B. N., & Areán, P. A. (2019). By the numbers: ratings and utilization of behavioral health mobile applications. NPJ digital medicine, 2(1), 54.

[4]. Hanemann, U., & Robinson, C. (2022). Rethinking literacy from a lifelong learning perspective in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals and the International Conference on Adult Education. International Review of Education, 68(2), 233-258.

[5]. Ventola, C. L. (2014). Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 39(5), 356.

[6]. Agarwal, S., Jalan, M., Wilcox, H. C., Sharma, R., Hill, R., Pantalone, E., ... & Robinson, K. A. (2022). Evaluation of mental health mobile applications.

[7]. Gibbons, R. D., Weiss, D. J., Frank, E., & Kupfer, D. (2016). Computerized adaptive diagnosis and testing of mental health disorders. Annual review of clinical psychology, 12, 83-104.

[8]. Fleming, T., Lucassen, M., Stasiak, K., Sutcliffe, K., & Merry, S. (2021). Technology Matters: SPARX–computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for adolescent depression in a game format. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 26(1), 92-94.

[9]. East, M. L., & Havard, B. C. (2015). Mental health mobile apps: from infusion to diffusion in the mental health social system. JMIR mental health, 2(1), e3954.

[10]. Gilster, P., & Glister, P. (1997). Digital literacy (p. 1). New York: Wiley Computer Pub.

[11]. Slevin, P., Kessie, T., Cullen, J., Butler, M. W., Donnelly, S. C., & Caulfield, B. (2020). Exploring the barriers and facilitators for the use of digital health technologies for the management of COPD: a qualitative study of clinician perceptions. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 113(3), 163-172.

[12]. Tracy, D. K., Gadelrab, R., Rahim, A., Pendlebury, G., Reza, H., Bhattacharya, R., ... & Dave, S. (2022). Digital literacy in contemporary mental healthcare: online assessments and mobile health apps. BJPsych Advances, 1-9.

[13]. Tyler, J. M., & Sabella, R. A. (2004). Using technology to improve counseling practice: A primer for the 21st century.

[14]. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. Third edition. New York. Free Press

[15]. Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. First edition. New York. Free Press

[16]. Lee, Y. H., Hsieh, Y. C., & Hsu, C. N. (2011). Adding innovation diffusion theory to the technology acceptance model: Supporting employees' intentions to use e-learning systems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 124-137.

[17]. Chetty, K., Aneja, U., Mishra, V., Gcora, N., & Josie, J. (2018). Bridging the digital divide in the G20: skills for the new age. Economics, 12(1), 20180024.

[18]. Fanea-Ivanovici, M., & Lee, Y. T. (2022). An Overview of Digital Literacy Frameworks: Focus on the Digital Literacy Framework (CDL). Available at SSRN 4088293.