Research Article
Open access
Published on 20 February 2024
Download pdf
Wei,Z. (2024). Apply advanced management techniques in demolition, renovation and construction projects to improve building material recycling efficiency and reduce carbon emissions. Advances in Engineering Innovation,6,32-43.
Export citation

Apply advanced management techniques in demolition, renovation and construction projects to improve building material recycling efficiency and reduce carbon emissions

Zeyuan Wei *,1,
  • 1 Auburn University of Building Science

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2977-3903/6/2024058

Abstract

This research delves into the complicated issues associated with demolition, renovation, and construction of buildings to find viable, sustainable practices that will relieve some strain on nature. Identifying major components like governmental policies, cooperative work of stakeholders, assimilation of technology, and the possible transformative capacity brought by Building Information Modeling (BIM), this research attempts to unveil how a more ecologically mindful construction industry can be achieved. The methodology used in this research has a multi-dimensional approach that is aimed at thoroughly understanding and clearing the challenges within the construction industry. The strengths like government support, stakeholder involvement, technological innovations, and adoption of BIM assist in building a strong base for sustainability. The research identified opportunities for technological advancements, special solutions, and government incentives. Technological advancement is a constantly changing environment, which gives the building sector an opportunity to adapt and enhance its recycling strategies. Customized solutions highlight the fact that such "place-based" strategies are needed because different urban, suburban, and rural landscapes present distinct challenges. Most property owners would be convinced to swap their regular buildings with sustainable building techniques through incentives from the government, such as tax benefits and subsidies. Furthermore, regulatory compliance issues and resistance to change cement the fact that societies need not only solid guidelines but also constant efforts to redefine standards in every industry. Effective negotiation between stakeholders becomes essential. Therefore, it can be stated that the findings give weight as catalysts of change in terms of action within the construction industry.

Keywords

reducing carbon emissions, building material recycling efficiency, sustainable construction, recycling material methods, advanced construction management techniques

[1]. Harrabin, R. (2022, May 26). Climate Change: MPs say building demolitions must be reduced. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-61580979

[2]. Augustine, Blay-Armah, A., Bahadori-Jahromi, A., Mohebbi, G., & Mylona, A. (2023). Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings: An End-of-Life Perspective. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.110402

[3]. Liu, J., Huang, Z., & Wang, X. (2020). Economic and Environmental Assessment of Carbon Emissions from Demolition Waste Based on LCA and LCC. Sustainability, 12(16), 6683. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166683

[4]. Elshaboury, N., Al-Sakkaf, A., Mohammed Abdelkader, E., & Alfalah, G. (2022). Construction and Demolition Waste Management Research: A Science Mapping Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8), 4496. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084496

[5]. Wang, T., Li, K., Liu, D., Yang, Y., & Wu, D. (2022). Estimating the Carbon Emission of Construction Waste Recycling Using Grey Model and Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study of Shanghai. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(14), 8507. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148507

[6]. Booth, R. (2021, November 28). Developers challenged over carbon footprint of new buildings in UK. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/nov/28/developers-challenged-over-carbon-footprint-of-new-buildings-in-uk

[7]. Restore Oregon. (2021, April 12). Understanding the Carbon Cost of Demolition. Restore Oregon. https://restoreoregon.org/2021/04/12/understanding-the-carbon-cost-of-demolition/

[8]. Chen, Z., Feng, Q., Yue, R., Chen, Z., Moselhi, O., Soliman, A., Hammad, A., & an, C. (2022). Construction, renovation, and demolition waste in landfill: A review of waste characteristics, environmental impacts, and mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(31), 46509–46526. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-022-20479-5

[9]. Purchase, Callun Keith, et al. “Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Lessons, Challenges, and Benefits.” Materials, vol. 15, no. 1, 23 December 2021, p. 76, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745857/, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010076. Accessed 2 December 2023.

[10]. Rebellon, L. F. M. (2012). Waste management: An integrated vision. In Google Books. BoD – Books on Demand. https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=_BOeDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA313&dq=construction

[11]. Epa.gov. (2023, February 7). Sustainable Management of Construction and Demolition Materials. https://www.epa.gov/smm/sustainable-management-construction-and-demolition-materials#recycling

[12]. Williams, D. (2022, April 30). How the Construction Industry Can Better Use Recycled Building Materials. Engineering News-Record. https://www.enr.com/articles/54035-how-the-construction-industry-can-better-use-recycled-building-materials

[13]. Marani, M. (2022, July 1). The Role of Circular Materials and Construction Practices in Reducing Carbon Emissions | Architectural Record. Www.architecturalrecord.com. https://www.architecturalrecord.com/articles/15734-the-role-of-circular-materials-and-construction-practices-in-reducing-carbon-emissions

[14]. Broadbent, Clare. “Steel’s Recyclability: Demonstrating the Benefits of Recycling Steel to Achieve a Circular Economy.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 21, no. 11, 21 March. 2016, pp. 1658–1665, link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-016-1081-1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1081-1. Accessed 2 December 2023.

[15]. Tietze, Matthias, et al. “The Ecological and Economic Advantages of Carbon Reinforced Concrete—Using the c3 Result House CUBE Especially the BOX Value Chain as an Example.” Civil Engineering Design, vol. 4, no. 1-3, 1 June 2022, pp. 79–88, https://doi.org/10.1002/cend.202200001. Accessed 2 December 2023.

[16]. Coelho, Patricia Megale, et al. “Sustainability of Reusable Packaging–Current Situation and Trends.” Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X, vol. 6, no. 2590-289X, 2020, p. 100037. ScienceDirect, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590289X20300086, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100037. Accessed 2 December 2023

[17]. Kubba, Sam. “Chapter 5 - Building Information Modeling.” ScienceDirect, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1 January 2012, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780123851284000056. Accessed 2 December 2023

[18]. Liu, Zhen, et al. “Building Information Modeling (BIM) Driven Carbon Emission Reduction Research: A 14-Year Bibliometric Analysis.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 19, 6 October 2022, p. 12820, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912820. Accessed 2 December 2023.

[19]. Spencer, Robert, and James Daniel. “BIM and Carbon Performance.” Infrastructure Intelligence, Infrastructure Intelligence, 7 July 2015, www.infrastructure-intelligence.com/article/jul-2015/bim-and-carbon-performance. Accessed 2 December 2023.

Cite this article

Wei,Z. (2024). Apply advanced management techniques in demolition, renovation and construction projects to improve building material recycling efficiency and reduce carbon emissions. Advances in Engineering Innovation,6,32-43.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Journal:Advances in Engineering Innovation

Volume number: Vol.6
ISSN:2977-3903(Print) / 2977-3911(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).