Download pdf
Research on confusing responses based on ChatGPT
- 1 Anhui University of Finance and Economics
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Recently, Artificial intelligence and Machine learning have changed the nature of scientific inquiry, with chatbots moving from rule-based technology to AI technology. Open AI’s ChatGPT is a prominent AI language model that has attracted great interest and attention since its launch. To better understand its role and influence in social life, it is very necessary to know its work carefully. This paper briefly introduces the development history, current situation, and future development of the ChatGPT, discusses its popular application fields, and analyzes its pros and cons. On this basis, some problems that still exist in the application are focused on. This study uses the case analysis method to emphasize the confusing responses of ChatGPT in multiple fields, telling people that while enjoying its powerful functions, should still pay attention to its side effects and risks, the most obvious one is deceptive behavior, providing users with misleading or fabricated information may further lead to other social problems. This study speculates on the future development of ChatGPT and proposes future development directions. Generally, by rationally utilizing the functions of ChatGPT, its potential in various fields can be better released, thereby promoting the advancement of conversational AI and its transformative impact on society.
Keywords
ChatGPT, Chatbot, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Artificial Intelligence Content Generation(AICG), Deceptive AI
[1]. OpenAI, https://openai.com/, 2023.
[2]. OpenAI. ChatGPT. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt
[3]. Ouyang L, Wu J, Jiang X, et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback [J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022, 35: 27730-27744.
[4]. Shen Y, Heacock L, Elias J, et al. ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords [J]. Radiology, 2023, 307(2): e230163.
[5]. Stokel-Walker C, Van Noorden R. What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science [J]. Nature, 2023, 614(7947): 214-216.
[6]. Krupp L, Steinert S, Kiefer-Emmanouilidis M, et al. Unreflected Acceptance--Investigating the Negative Consequences of ChatGPT-Assisted Problem-Solving in Physics Education [J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.03087, 2023.
[7]. Weissweiler L, Hofmann V, Kantharuban A, et al. Counting the Bugs in ChatGPT's Wugs: A Multilingual Investigation into the Morphological Capabilities of a Large Language Model [J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.15113, 2023.
[8]. Sallam M. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns [C]//Healthcare. MDPI, 2023, 11(6): 887.
[9]. Milmo D. ChatGPT reaches 100 million users two months after launch [J]. The Guardian, 2023, 3.
[10]. Rabiner L, Juang B. An introduction to hidden Markov models [J]. ieee assp magazine, 1986, 3(1): 4-16.
[11]. Reynolds D A. Gaussian mixture models [J]. Encyclopedia of biometrics, 2009, 741(659-663).
[12]. A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4,https://www.marktechpost.com/2023/03/21/a-history-of-generative-ai-from-gan-to-gpt-4/,2023
[13]. Sallam M. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns [C]//Healthcare. MDPI, 2023, 11(6): 887.
[14]. Macey-Dare R. How ChatGPT and Generative AI Systems will Revolutionize Legal Services and the Legal Profession [J]. Available at SSRN, 2023.
[15]. Borji A. A categorical archive of chatbot failures [J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03494, 2023.
[16]. Kocoń J, Cichecki I, Kaszyca O, et al. ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none [J]. Information Fusion, 2023: 101861.
[17]. Rozado D. The political biases of chatgpt [J]. Social Sciences, 2023, 12(3): 148.
[18]. Future of Life Institute, Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter,2023https://futureoflife.org/open- letter/pause- giant- ai- experiments/
[19]. Hisan U K, Amri M M. ChatGPT and medical education: A double-edged sword [J]. Journal of Pedagogy and Education Science, 2023, 2(01): 71-89.
[20]. Quach K. Researchers made an OpenAI GPT-3 medical chatbot as an experiment. It told a mock patient to kill themselves [J]. The Register, 2020.
[21]. Poola I. TUNING CHATGPT MATHEMATICAL REASONING LIMITATIONS AND FAILURES WITH PROCESS SUPERVISION [J]. 2023.
[22]. Frieder S, Pinchetti L, Griffiths R R, et al. Mathematical capabilities of chatgpt [J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13867, 2023.
[23]. Singh S. Is ChatGPT Biased? A Review [J]. 2023.
[24]. Monteith S, Glenn T, Geddes J R, et al. Artificial intelligence and increasing misinformation [J]. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2023: 1-3.
[25]. Ji Z, Lee N, Frieske R, et al. Survey of hallucination in natural language generation [J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023, 55(12): 1-38. Singh S. Is ChatGPT Biased? A Review [J]. 2023.
[26]. Elali F R, Rachid L N. AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community [J]. Patterns, 2023, 4(3).
[27]. Sallam M. The utility of ChatGPT as an example of large language models in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the future perspectives and potential limitations [J]. medRxiv, 2023: 2023.02. 19.23286155.
[28]. Wang C, Liu S, Yang H, et al. Ethical considerations of using ChatGPT in health care [J]. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2023, 25: e48009.
[29]. Greco G M, Floridi L. The tragedy of the digital commons [J]. Ethics and Information Technology, 2004, 6(2): 73-81.
[30]. Castelluccio M. Creating ethical chatbots [J]. Strategic Finance, 2019, 101(6): 53-55.
[31]. Salles A, Evers K, Farisco M. Anthropomorphism in AI [J]. AJOB Neuroscience, 2020, 11(2): 88-95.
[32]. "ChatGPT is a game changer, but we're not quite ready to play.", The Lancet Digital Health, March 2023 issue. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/chatgpt-game-changer-were-quite-ready-play-the-lancet
Cite this article
Xiong,H. (2024). Research on confusing responses based on ChatGPT. Applied and Computational Engineering,57,90-97.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computing and Data Science
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).