Download pdf
Does a Soda Tax Make Sense? A Dual-City Survey Study in Philadelphia and Oakland
- 1 School of Mathematical Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100032
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The implementation of soda taxes as a public health measure to curb sugar-sweetened beverage consumption has gained significant attention in recent years. Through a dual-city survey conducted in 2017 and 2018, we gathered data on consumer behavior, merchant decision, and tax impact on beverage consumption patterns. The results of the DID study showed that after the implementation of the SSB tax in Philadelphia in 2017, the consumption of SSB beverages changed significantly. However, in Oakland, there was a slight change after 2018. Additionally, the tax has been well-received by a considerable portion of the population, with a majority expressing support for its continuation. However, combined with the data analysis, I found that under the influence of different consumer pass-through rates, the actual implementation effects of sugar tax in Philadelphia and Oakland are different. The consumption of SSBs in Philadelphia decreases and the consumption of alternative goods increases, while the consumption of SSBs and alternative goods in Oakland decreases significantly and simultaneously. This study will provide arguments for the debate on the effectiveness and acceptability of SSB taxes as a public health intervention by analyzing the reasons for differences in actual implementation of policies between the two cities, while providing new analytical directions for policymakers.
Keywords
Soda Tax, Merchant Decision, Pigovian Tax, Substitute Goods
[1]. Frisvold, David E., and Jones, David. Multicity Study of the Impact of Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and Oakland, California Metropolitan Areas, 2016-2018. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2022-08-09. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37925.v1.
[2]. Bernabé, E., Vehkalahti, M. M., Sheiham, A., Aromaa, A., & Suominen, A. L. (2014). Sugar-sweetened beverages and dental caries in adults: A 4-year prospective study. Journal of Dentistry, 42(8), 952–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.011.
[3]. C de Chaisemartin, X D’HaultfŒuille, Fuzzy Differences-in-Differences, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 85, Issue 2, April 2018, Pages 999–1028, https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdx049.
[4]. Hunt Allcott, Benjamin B Lockwood, Dmitry Taubinsky, Regressive Sin Taxes, with an Application to the Optimal Soda Tax, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 134, Issue 3, August 2019, Pages 1557–1626, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz017.
[5]. Kusama, T., Nakazawa, N., Takeuchi, K., Kiuchi, S., & Osaka, K. (2022). Free sugar intake and periodontal diseases: A systematic review. Nutrients, 14(21), 4444. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14214444.
[6]. Lovenheim, M. F. (2008). How far to the border?: The extent and impact of cross-border casual cigarette smuggling. National Tax Journal, 61(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2008.1.01.
[7]. Malik, V. S., & Hu, F. B. (2022). The role of sugar-sweetened beverages in the global epidemics of obesity and chronic diseases. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 18(4), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-021-00627-6.
[8]. Philip DeCicca, Donald Kenkel, Feng Liu, Excise tax avoidance: The case of state cigarette taxes, Journal of Health Economics, Volume 32, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1130-1141, ISSN 0167-6296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.08.005.
[9]. Pan, F., Owen, N., & Oddy, W. H. (2021). Sugar sweetened beverages and increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes in the indigenous community of Australia. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, 31(10), 2825–2830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2021.06.014.
[10]. Ryan Richard Ruff, Chen Zhen, Estimating the effects of a calorie-based sugar-sweetened beverage tax on weight and obesity in New York City adults using dynamic loss models, Annals of Epidemiology, Volume 25, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 350-357, ISSN 1047-2797, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.12.008
[11]. Qi Zhang, Jill J. McCluskey, R. Karina Gallardo, Michael P. Brady, Avoidance behaviors circumventing the sugar-sweetened beverages tax, Food Policy, Volume 105, 2021, 102166, ISSN 0306-9192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102166.
[12]. Silver LD, Ng SW, Ryan-Ibarra S, Taillie LS, Induni M, et al. (2017) Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study. PLOS Medicine 14(4): e1002283. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283.
[13]. Salgado, M. V., Penko, J., Fernandez, A., Konfino, J., Coxson, P. G., Bibbins-Domingo, K., & Mejia, R. (2020). Projected impact of a reduction in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption on diabetes and cardiovascular disease in Argentina: A modeling study. PLOS Medicine, 17(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003224.
[14]. Seiler, S., Tuchman, A., & Yao, S. (2020). The impact of soda taxes: Pass-through, tax avoidance, and nutritional effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243720969401.
[15]. Zhou, B., Ichikawa, R., Parnell, L. D., Noel, S. E., Zhang, X., Bhupathiraju, S. N., Smith, C. E., Tucker, K. L., Ordovas, J. M., & Lai, C.-Q. (2020b). Metabolomic links between sugar-sweetened beverage intake and obesity. Journal of Obesity, 2020, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7154738.
Cite this article
Ge,J. (2024). Does a Soda Tax Make Sense? A Dual-City Survey Study in Philadelphia and Oakland. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,101,101-105.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Financial Technology and Business Analysis
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).