Download pdf
Risk Factors of Mariculture Supply Chain Based on Green Development: A Case Study of Changhai County in China
- 1 Department of environmental engineering, HoHai University, Nanjing, China, 210024
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
China is a global leader in aquaculture, and mariculture has become an important part of Chinese agriculture and one of the important growth points of the rural economy. However, environmental changes and industrial restructuring have brought new risks to the aquaculture supply chain. Recently, people have also paid more and more attention to the marine environment because a good marine environment is the foundation of the healthy development of mariculture. This study analyses the risks in the aquaculture supply chain from the perspective of the marine environment, using Changhai County, Liaoning Province, as an example. The study identified marine environmental issues such as over-sized aquaculture, irrational aquaculture structure, resource integration gaps, nuclear wastewater discharge and offshore oil pollution. Recommendations included restructuring aquaculture, professional training, establishing cooperative mechanisms, and improving seafood quality testing and marine environment monitoring. Addressing these challenges is essential to ensure the stable and healthy development of seafood markets and the sustainability of the aquaculture industry.
Keywords
Supply chain risk, Risk factors, Marine environment, Mariculture, Sustainable development
[1]. Lu, K., Gao, J., & Hao, P. (2016). Evaluation of mariculture resources development and analysis of its support policy in China. Agricultural Economic Issues, 2016(3), 95-103, 112.
[2]. Zeng, W., Han, M., Zhang, R., et al. (2020). Pollution characteristics and ecological risks of organophosphate esters in the water of Qinzhou Bay mariculture zone. Marine Environmental Science, 39(4), 600-605, 613.
[3]. Liu, Y. (2015). Study on China's New Economic Normal and the Sustainable Development Trend of "Blue Granary"-Taking Dalian City as an Example. In 2015 Proceedings of the Expert Seminar on China's Fishery Economy (pp. 190-197).
[4]. Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Yang, X., Wang, S., Liu, X., Liu, B., Zhang, J., Meng, D., Ding, K., Gao, K., Zeng, X., & Ding, Y. (2023). Changes in mariculture and offshore seawater quality in China during the past 20 years. Ecological Indicators, 157, 111220.
[5]. Stentiford, G. D., Peeler, E. J., Tyler, C. R., Bickley, L. K., Holt, C. C., Bass, D., ... & Hartnell, R. E. (2022). A seafood risk tool for assessing and mitigating chemical and pathogen hazards in the aquaculture supply chain. Nature Food, 3(2), 169-178.
[6]. Gao, X., Yu, Z., Xia, Y., Li, Y. (2020). The present situation, problems and countermeasures for sustainable development of sea fishery industry in Changhai County. Fishery Information and Strategy, 35(4), 257-261.
[7]. Teng, W., Zheng, J., Xie, X., et al. (2022). Current situation and suggestions for the development of oyster industry in Dalian. China Fisheries Economics, 40(2), 84-90.
[8]. Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Inc. (2021). Fish measures at the port of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. Retrieved from [insert link here]
[9]. Yi Liu, Xue-Qing Guo, Sun-Wei Li, Jian-Min Zhang. (2022). Discharge of treated Fukushima nuclear accident contaminated water: macroscopic and microscopic simulations. National Science Review, 9(1), nwa.
[10]. Zhang, H., Mu, Q., Han, X., et al. (2023). Weathering, ecological effects, and environmental risk assessment of oil spills in marine ecosystems. Marine Science, 47(1), 99-107.
[11]. Li, G., & Peng, J. (2015). Research on information disclosure in marine pollution emergencies: a case study of the Penglai 19-3 oil spill. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Social Sciences Edition), 2015(3), 12-17.
Cite this article
Sun,Y. (2024). Risk Factors of Mariculture Supply Chain Based on Green Development: A Case Study of Changhai County in China. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,102,28-33.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of ICEMGD 2024 Workshop: Decoupling Corporate Finance Implications of Firm Climate Action
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).