Download pdf
An Analysis of the Walt Disney Company (DIS) Financial Performance and Comparison with Competitors
- 1 School of Economics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is a giant in the entertainment industry with a diversified investment portfolio, including theme parks and streaming services such as Disney+. This article provides an in-depth analysis of DIS's liquidity, solvency, profitability, and valuation, and compares it with major competitors such as Sony, Comcast, and Netflix. DIS has demonstrated good liquidity and debt paying ability, thanks to diversified sources of income and prudent financial management. Compared to competitors such as Netflix, although its profitability indicators are robust, there is room for improvement. Valuation indicators indicate that, the pricing of DIS's stock price is relatively reasonable, but investors should be aware of the risk of overvaluation. DIS's strategies include expanding streaming services, maximizing theme park revenue, and embracing digital transformation. Although DIS offers the potential for stable growth, investors must be wary of industry disruption and constantly changing consumer preferences. In this rapidly developing entertainment industry, the position of DIS cannot be ignored, and investors also need to carefully weigh risk and return. This paper adopts fundamental analysis to inform investors insights of the risks and opportunities of DIS.
Keywords
Financial Analysis, The Walt Disney Company, Entertainment Industry, Operation Management
[1]. Chen, H., Li, Y., Ling, X., & Yan, M. (2022). Corporate strategy analysis based on current environment — Taking Disney’s expansion in China as an example. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 2.
[2]. Yang, J. (2019). Analysis of business operation management under the Harvard analytical framework: A case study of the Walt Disney Company. In Proceedings of 1st International Symposium on Economic Development and Management Innovation (EDMI 2019) (pp. 126-139). School of Economics, Hefei University of Technology.
[3]. Sumathi, A., & Narasimhaiah, T. (2016). A study on the effect of working capital on the profitability of Infosys. ICTACT Journal on Management Studies, 3.
[4]. Koen, M., & Oberholster, J. (1999). Analysis and interpretation of financial statements (p. 54). Juta & Co, Ltd.
[5]. Wijaya, D. P. (2020). Effects of quick ratio, return on assets and exchange rates on stock returns. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR), 4(1), 323–329.
[6]. Rutkowska-Ziarko, A. (2015). The influence of profitability ratios and company size on profitability and investment risk in the capital market. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 15(1), 151–161.
[7]. Nariswari, T. N., & Nugraha, N. M. (2020). Profit growth: Impact of net profit margin, gross profit margin and total assets turnover. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486), 9(4), 87–96.
[8]. Anwar, Y. (2019). The effect of return on equity, earning per share and price earning ratio on stock prices. The Accounting Journal of Binaniaga, 4(01).
[9]. Guozhu, L. (2011). Research of self-adaptive transmission policy for stream media. In Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems (ICIS 2011) (Vol. 1, pp. 550-553).
[10]. Chen, S. (2022). The impact of digital transformation on analyst forecast accuracy. In Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on Economic Development and Management Innovation (EDMI 2022) (pp. 381-392). College of Economic and Management, Xiamen University.
Cite this article
Ye,Z. (2024). An Analysis of the Walt Disney Company (DIS) Financial Performance and Comparison with Competitors. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,110,60-66.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of ICEMGD 2024 Workshop: Decoupling Corporate Finance Implications of Firm Climate Action
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).