Download pdf
Financial and Market Implications of the CSX-Conrail Acquisition
- 1 College of science，Zhejiang University of Science and Technology，Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
- 2 Maple Leaf International School Chongqing, 777 Xuefu Avenue, Yongchuan District, Chongqing，China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Conrail, Consolidated Rail Corporation, founded in 1976, was established due to the bankruptcy of multiple railway companies in the Northeast and Midwest regions of the United States. The federal government intervened to establish the company with the aim of restoring the services and profitability of bankrupt railways. As it developed, Conrail's railway network covered major cities and industrial centers in the Northeast and Midwest of the United States, possessing a strong market position and strategic value. Therefore, Conrail had become a target for mergers and acquisitions by large railway companies such as CSX and Norfolk Southern. Through mergers and acquisitions, the acquiring party could expand market coverage, enhance operational network connectivity and competitiveness. This is a complex and multi-layered issue, the CSX acquisition of Conrail involved financial and market implications, legal obstacles, competitive pressures, and strategic objectives. By analyzing these themes in depth, we could understand the key issues and response strategies that enterprises face in the M&A process, providing valuable experience for future M&A transactions. The study applied methods such as comparative analysis and case model analysis to analyze the main challenges, response strategies, and effects comprehensively and systematically in the M&A process, providing reference for similar cases. Overall, CSX's acquisition of Conrail demonstrates how companies can achieve acquisition goals and long-term development through flexible strategies, effective communication, and professional management in the face of complex legal, market, and operational challenges.
Keywords
Conrail, mergers and acquisitions, CSX, Norfolk Southern
[1]. Esty, Benjamin C., The Acquisition of Consolidated Rail Corporation (a and B) (June 1, 1998). Case No: 9-297-006, 9-298-095; Teaching Notes: 5-298-087, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=102551
[2]. Renneboog, Luc; Vansteenkiste, Cara (2019). Failure and success in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, (), S0929119918303298–.
[3]. Rashid, Abdul; Naeem, Nazia (2016). Effects of Mergers on Corporate Performance: An Empirical Evaluation using OLS and the Empirical Bayesian Methods. Borsa Istanbul Review, (), S2214845016300163–.
[4]. Ishii, Joy; Xuan, Yuhai (2014). Acquirer-target social ties and merger outcomes. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(3), 344–363.
[5]. Kansal, Sugandh; Chandani, Arti (2014). Effective Management of Change During Merger and Acquisition. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11(), 208–217.
[6]. Bena, Jan; Li, Kai(2014). Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 69(5), 1923–1960.
[7]. Alfred E. FAZIO(2016). THE HUMAN-FACTOR SIDE OF CONRAIL[J]. Railway age,217(3):31-32.
[8]. Joseph L Barnett, Donald Bourquard, William R Martin(1986).Development of Norfolk Southern's model of conrail-1985 to 1994. 22-24,Seattle, Washington
[9]. Factors Affecting Railroad Electrification as Applied to ConRail.[R].:1-116.
[10]. PETER HAYES(2018). Conrail Loses Insurance Claims for Inherited Contamination[J]. Environment reporter,49(9):314.
[11]. Conrail Realigns, Names New Officers[J]. Skillings Mining Review(1996).85(4):24-0.
Cite this article
Fang,J.;Lei,Q. (2024). Financial and Market Implications of the CSX-Conrail Acquisition. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,114,76-84.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of ICEMGD 2024 Workshop: Innovative Strategies in Microeconomic Business Management
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).