1. Introduction
With the continuous advancement of the collective forest rights reform, the contracting rights of forest land and the ownership of forest trees have been implemented to households through family contracting. This has achieved “defining the ownership of mountains, stabilizing the roots of trees, and reassuring the people,” enhancing operational efficiency, activating forest resources, and unleashing development potential. Heilongjiang Province is a major forestry province in China, with abundant forest resources, making it highly suitable for developing the under-forest economy. The province’s forest area covers 20.12 million hectares, with a forest coverage rate of 44.47%, and a forest stock volume of 2.158 billion cubic meters. Developing the under-forest economy is an effective way to improve the utilization rate of forest resources, promote the development of characteristic industries, create jobs, increase income, and advance agricultural modernization, thereby achieving rural revitalization.
In terms of basic research on the under-forest economy, Wu Juan et al. [1] believe that the under-forest economy relies on forest land resources and the ecological environment, focusing on under-forest planting, under-forest breeding, forest product processing, forest landscapes, and forest tourism. It is a three-dimensional composite economy and an important part of the agricultural and rural economy. Pu Wenbin et al. [2] argue that the development of the under-forest economy significantly improves the utilization efficiency of forest land, increases the comprehensive economic value of the forest industry, improves the ecological environment of forests, effectively protects biodiversity, and actively cultivates new green industries, thus promoting farmers’ income and rural revitalization. Zhang Jiping [3] points out that current problems in the development of the under-forest economy include insufficient mastery of science and technology and knowledge, inadequate overall planning, insufficient market information flow, and inadequate financial support. Regarding development strategies, Ling Yue [4] suggests conducting reasonable and scientific planning and design, promoting policy support, exploring suitable development models, and continuously extending the industrial chain of the under-forest economy. In research on influencing factors, Wang Zi et al. [5], based on sample characteristics and factor correlation, use factor analysis for modeling and believe that industrial clustering, local policies and laws, and knowledge innovation are the main factors influencing the development of the under-forest economy. Lin Chaoren et al. [6], through the use of CiteSpace for visual literature analysis, find that financial and fiscal support, the construction of forestry talent teams, and the scale of industrial development significantly impact the development of the under-forest economy.
In summary, some scholars have conducted multi-dimensional and multi-perspective discussions and research on the concept, significance, existing problems, strategies, and influencing factors of the under-forest economy. However, due to the limited scope of research cases and subjects, there are gaps in the selection of empirical analysis indicators, and classifications are not clear enough. Additionally, few studies combine real-time survey data to specifically analyze the influencing factors of the under-forest economy development in a particular region, lacking targeted countermeasures. This paper addresses these issues and, using data from the National Forestry and Grassland Administration, analyzes the influencing factors and development strategies of the under-forest economy in nine prefecture-level cities and one region in Heilongjiang Province, aiming to expand and supplement the current research scope.
2. Overview of the Study Area

Figure 1: Maps of the study area
Figure 1(a) shows the world map, Figure 1(b) shows the map of China, Figure 1(c) shows the map of Heilongjiang Province, and Figure 1(d) shows the forest coverage map of Heilongjiang Province. From these maps, it can be observed that Heilongjiang Province is located in the northeastern part of China, at the northernmost position and the highest latitude. The province is composed of mountains, plateaus, plains, and water surfaces, with high terrain in the northwest, north, and southeast, and low terrain in the northeast and southwest. The province is rich in natural resources, with forestry operations covering about two-thirds of the total area. Heilongjiang Province comprises 12 prefecture-level cities, 1 region, 21 county-level cities, and 67 counties (cities). Influenced by its geographical location, the output value of the under-forest economy in Heilongjiang Province has grown rapidly, with a compound annual growth rate of 34.29% from 2018 to 2022. This growth has significantly contributed to increasing employment opportunities for farmers and enhancing the income of forest area workers and residents.
3. Data Sources and Sample Characteristics
3.1. Data Sources
The data for this study were collected from April to May 2024 by a survey team composed of teachers and students from the School of Economics and Business Administration of a university. The survey investigated the basic situation of forest farmers’ households and their under-forest management in different forest areas of Heilongjiang Province. Stratified random sampling was used to select the survey samples from Harbin, Qiqihar, Jixi, Heihe, Daqing, Yichun, Jiamusi, Mudanjiang, Suihua, and Daxing’anling Region in Heilongjiang Province. A total of 180 questionnaires were distributed, 160 were returned, and 124 valid questionnaires were obtained, with an effective rate of 68.89%. Table 1 shows the distribution of valid samples by location.
Table 1: Regional distribution of sample forest farmers
City (region) |
Forestry bureau |
Sample/House-hold |
City (region) |
Forestry bureau |
Sample/Househ-old |
Harbin City |
Harbin Forestry and Grassland Bureau |
30 |
Yichun City |
Yichun Forestry and Grassland Bureau |
12 |
Qiqihar City |
Qiqihar Forestry and Grassland Bureau |
15 |
Jiamusi City |
Forestry and Grassland Bureau of Jiamusi City |
8 |
Jixi City |
Forestry and Grassland Bureau of Jixi City |
12 |
Mudanjiang City |
Mudanjiang Forestry and Grassland Bureau |
11 |
Heihe City |
Forestry and Grassland Bureau of Heihe City |
15 |
Suihua City |
Suihua Natural Resources Bureau |
6 |
Daqing City |
Daqing Forestry and Grassland Bureau |
11 |
The Greater Khingan Mountains region |
Forestry and Grassland Bureau of the Administrative Office of the Greater Khingan Mountains Region |
4 |
3.2. Sample Characteristics
Due to the extensive scope of the under-forest economy, this study primarily focuses on under-forest planting. The survey content is mainly divided into the basic situation of forest farmer households, household income, under-forest production and management, financial and technical issues, and product sales issues. This paper selects 11 key data points from three aspects: individual characteristics of forest farmers, forest product management and sales, and external policy environment (Table 2). Additionally, some basic characteristics of the sample are analyzed (Table 3).
Table 2: Selection of Indicators
Indicator type |
Evaluation type |
variable |
Individual characteristics of forest farmers |
Number of household labor force |
\[ \text{X}_{\text{1}} \] |
|
Family wage income |
\[ \text{X}_{\text{2}} \] |
|
Planting area of forest products |
\[ \text{X}_{\text{3}} \] |
|
Attention to forestry technology |
\[ \text{X}_{\text{4}} \] |
|
Whether to join the cooperative |
\[ \text{X}_{\text{5}} \] |
Management and sales of forest products |
Selling price of forest products |
\[ \text{X}_{\text{6}} \] |
|
Forest product quality |
\[ \text{X}_{\text{7}} \] |
|
Will the product remain unsold |
\[ \text{X}_{\text{8}} \] |
|
Production material supply issues |
\[ \text{X}_{\text{9}} \] |
External policy environment |
Do you understand the subsidy policies for understory economy |
\[ \text{X}_{\text{10}} \] |
|
Whether to apply for subsidies |
\[ \text{X}_{\text{11}} \] |
Table 3: Basic characteristics of samples
Project |
Index |
Frequency |
Proportion (%) |
Number of household labor force/person |
1 |
23 |
18.55 |
|
2 |
61 |
49.19 |
|
≥3 |
40 |
32.26 |
Household wage income/yuan |
≤10000 |
16 |
12.9 |
|
10000<X≤30000 |
74 |
59.68 |
|
30000<X≤50000 |
32 |
25.81 |
|
>50000 |
2 |
1.61 |
Planting area of forest products/mu |
≤2 |
26 |
20.97 |
|
2<X≤5 |
56 |
45.16 |
|
>5 |
42 |
33.87 |
Development model |
Forest mushroom pattern |
27 |
23.48 |
|
Forest medicine mode |
58 |
50.43 |
|
Forest vegetable mode |
30 |
26.09 |

Figure 2: Basic characteristics of the sample
Figure 2(a) shows the number of household laborers, Figure 2(b) shows the household wage income, Figure 2(c) shows the under-forest planting area, and Figure 2(d) shows the development models. Among the 124 sample forest farmer households, 27 have an educational level of primary school or below, 39 have a junior high school education, 41 have a high school (including vocational school) education, and 17 have an education level of college or above. The percentage of those with a high school education or above is 46.77%. All 124 households are involved in the under-forest economy, with some developing a single model and most engaging in multiple models simultaneously. About 81.45% of households have two or more laborers. In terms of annual household wage income, forest farmers generally have low income with significant disparities, averaging about 11,938.5 yuan. More than half of the sample forest farmers have an income of less than 20,000 yuan. The low income is attributed to the small number and low quality of laborers, while higher income is due to supplementary engagement in industrial and commercial activities. There is a wide range in the planting area, from a minimum of 1 mu to a maximum of 13 mu, indicating varied levels of development. Most forest farmers are involved in under-forest planting, mainly using forest-fungus, forest-medicine, and forest-vegetable models. The forest-medicine model is the most favored, accounting for over 50% because of its low cost and low risk. As market demand for high-quality food increases, more forest farmers are engaging in under-forest planting, leading to improved quality of forest products.
4. Empirical Research
4.1. Model Establishment
Based on the survey data and sample characteristics analysis, it can be preliminarily analyzed that the development of the under-forest economy by forest farmers in Heilongjiang Province is influenced by various factors. This means that a dependent variable is affected by several independent variables, making multiple linear regression analysis appropriate. This paper describes the influencing factors of the development of the under-forest economy in Heilongjiang Province from the perspective of the income of forest farmer households engaged in under-forest management and establishes a multiple linear regression model with the following structure:
\[ \text{Y=}\text{β}_{\text{0}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{1}}\text{β}_{\text{1}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{2}}\text{β}_{\text{2}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{3}}\text{β}_{\text{3}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{4}}\text{β}_{\text{4}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{5}}\text{β}_{\text{5}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{6}}\text{β}_{\text{6}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{7}}\text{β}_{\text{7}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{8}}\text{β}_{\text{8}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{9}}\text{β}_{\text{9}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{10}}\text{β}_{\text{10}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{11}}\text{β}_{\text{11}}\text{+μ} \] \[ \text{Y=}\text{β}_{\text{0}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{1}}\text{β}_{\text{1}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{2}}\text{β}_{\text{2}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{3}}\text{β}_{\text{3}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{4}}\text{β}_{\text{4}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{5}}\text{β}_{\text{5}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{6}}\text{β}_{\text{6}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{7}}\text{β}_{\text{7}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{8}}\text{β}_{\text{8}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{9}}\text{β}_{\text{9}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{10}}\text{β}_{\text{10}}\text{+}\text{X}_{\text{11}}\text{β}_{\text{11}}\text{+μ} \]
Where \( \text{Y} \) \( \text{Y} \) is the dependent variable representing the income (in yuan) of forest farmer households from under-forest management; \( \text{X}_{\text{1}} \) to \( \text{X}_{\text{11}} \) represent each independent variable; \( \text{β}_{\text{0}} \) is the constant term; \( \text{β}_{\text{1}} \) to 𝛽 11 represent the regression coefficients of each factor; and μ is the random error term, representing factors that are difficult to quantify and have a minor impact. to \( \text{β}_{\text{11}} \)
The specific statistical characteristics of the variables are shown in Table 4. Other factors affecting the profitability of the under-forest economy, such as management level, economic management system, and social services, also impact the income of forest farmers but are not easily quantifiable and, therefore, not well represented in the model. Additionally, since the products managed by forest farmers in the under-forest economy rarely involve processing, this factor is also not considered in the model.
Table 4: Descriptive statistics of variables
variable |
Variable Description |
Mean value |
Standard deviation |
Number of household labor force ( \( \text{X}_{\text{1}} \) )/ person |
Continuous variable |
2.043 |
0.769 |
Household wage income ( \( \text{X}_{\text{2}} \) )/ yuan |
Forestry bureaus, enterprises and institutions, working or part-time, and individual industrial and commercial operations; continuous variable |
11938.5 |
13430.6 |
Planting area of forest products ( \( \text{X}_{\text{3}} \) )/mu |
Continuous variable |
4.73 |
2.69 |
Attention to forestry technology ( \( \text{X}_{\text{4}} \) ) |
1=not following, 2=occasionally following, 3=frequently following; Dummy variable |
2.07 |
0.714 |
Whether to join the cooperative ( \( \text{X}_{\text{5}} \) ) |
0=No, 1=Yes; Dummy variable |
1.48 |
0.5 |
Selling price of forest products ( \( \text{X}_{\text{6}} \) )/( yuan \( \text{ ∙}\text{kg}^{\text{-1}} \) ) |
Forest product sales prices, continuous variables |
30 |
13.81 |
Forest product quality ( \( \text{X}_{\text{7}} \) ) |
0=average,,1=high-quality;Dummy variable |
1.44 |
0.497 |
Will the product remain unsold ( \( \text{X}_{\text{8}} \) ) |
0=No, 1=Yes; Dummy variable |
1.45 |
0.498 |
Production material supply issue ( \( \text{X}_{\text{9}} \) ) |
0=no problem, 1=there is a problem; Dummy variable |
1.36 |
0.481 |
Understand the subsidy policy for understory economy ( \( \text{X}_{\text{10}} \) ) |
0=No, 1=Yes; Dummy variable |
1.24 |
0.433 |
Whether to apply for subsidies ( \( \text{X}_{\text{11}} \) ) |
0=No, 1=Yes; Dummy variable |
1.44 |
0.497 |
Household understory operating income ( \( \text{Y} \) )/ yuan \( \text{Y} \) |
Continuous variable |
18207.5 |
14937.6 |
4.2. Regression Analysis
Based on the valid data provided by the questionnaire, multiple linear regression analysis was performed using Eviews software, with the results shown in Table 5. The Eviews regression analysis results indicate that \( \text{R}^{\text{2}} \) = 0.654, suggesting a high goodness-of-fit for the regression model. The F-value is 19.243, with a significance level of 0.000, indicating that all explanatory variables have a significant linear impact on the dependent variable Y. However, the significance of each individual variable varies.
Table 5: Estimation results of regression model for the influencing factors of understory economy
Variable |
Correlation coefficient |
Standard error |
Variable |
Correlation coefficient |
Standard error |
(Constant) |
-24040.193 |
9165.463 |
Selling price of forest products ( \( \text{X}_{\text{6}} \) )/( yuan \( \text{ ∙}\text{kg}^{\text{-1}} \) ) |
376.378* |
1381.662 |
Number of household labor force ( \( \text{X}_{\text{1}} \) )/ person |
3289.349*** |
1629.743 |
Forest product quality ( \( \text{X}_{\text{7}} \) ) |
531.777* |
1934.219 |
Household wage income ( \( \text{X}_{\text{2}} \) )/ yuan |
0.317*** |
0.077 |
Will the product remain unsold ( \( \text{X}_{\text{8}} \) ) |
-1275.114 |
1743.082 |
Planting area of forest products ( \( \text{X}_{\text{3}} \) )/mu |
2329.799*** |
161.169 |
Production material supply issue ( \( \text{X}_{\text{9}} \) ) |
-3367.020 |
1829.027 |
Attention to forestry technology ( \( \text{X}_{\text{4}} \) ) |
3856.685*** |
1346.508 |
Understand the subsidy policy for understory economy ( \( \text{X}_{\text{10}} \) ) |
418.875* |
1978.001 |
Whether to join the cooperative ( \( \text{X}_{\text{5}} \) ) |
-7640.318 |
2399.558 |
Whether to apply for subsidies ( \( \text{X}_{\text{11}} \) ) |
6367.789*** |
2007.544 |
\[ \text{R}^{\text{2}} \] |
0.654 |
\[ \text{F-statistic} \] |
19.243( \( \text{Sig=0.000} \) ) |

Figure 3: Estimation results of regression models
In multiple linear regression, a significant regression equation does not necessarily mean that each independent variable has a significant impact on Y. In Table 5, the significance of variables \( \text{X}_{\text{5}} \) to \( \text{X}_{\text{10}} \) is weak. Generally, cooperatives have a positive impact on the development of the under-forest economy. However, there are currently few cooperatives in forest areas, with limited participation from sample forest farmers and weak cooperative awareness, resulting in weak significance. Typically, higher product quality leads to higher prices, but the demand for forest products is relatively stable, with weak brand effects and low price elasticity, so the impact is not significant. The supply of production materials and unsold products are negatively correlated with under-forest management income, but due to the specificity of the products, the impact is not significant. The subsidy application process is complex, making it difficult and costly for forest farmers to obtain subsidies. The regression results show that the number of household laborers, wage income, planting area, attention to forestry technology, and subsidies from the forestry bureau have significant and positive impacts on under-forest management income. Among these, planting area has the greatest impact, as scaling up operations can reduce costs and increase income. An increase in household wage income promotes growth in under-forest economy income. The number of laborers also has a positive correlation with under-forest economy income. Forest farmers who pay attention to developments in forestry technology tend to expand their business scope, increase market opportunities, and improve income. Subsidies from the forestry bureau represent government support, and increasing subsidy amounts and relaxing application conditions can help develop the under-forest economy.
Although there may be errors in the regression model analysis results that need improvement, the findings of this study’s regression model analysis align with most people’s experiential intuition.
5. Conclusion and Policy Recommendations
5.1. Conclusion
Based on the analysis of influencing factors, this study finds that the development of the under-forest economy in Heilongjiang Province has shown initial results but still faces the following issues: the plots of land used by forest farmers for under-forest economy are small and fragmented, not reaching a sufficient scale; there is limited use of new technologies in the management process, and information flow among forest farmers is poor during sales; there are few forest product cooperatives and their development is inadequate, with weak willingness among forest farmers to participate in cooperatives; and there is insufficient publicity and implementation of subsidy policies from the forestry bureau.
5.2. Policy Recommendations
Based on the descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis results, the following recommendations are proposed:
(1) Concentrate Land for Scaled Operations: The government should provide policy support and assistance to ensure that forest farmers can effectively utilize resources and achieve scaled operations in the under-forest economy. (2) Increase Technological Investment and Establish Information Platforms: Utilize the internet to establish platforms for sharing information and expanding sales channels. Enhance technological support to improve production efficiency. (3) Increase the Number of Cooperatives and Boost Forest Farmers’ Participation: The government should encourage the establishment of cooperatives by providing financial and technical support. Collaborating within cooperatives can reduce costs and increase income for forest farmers. (4) Enhance the Promotion of Under-Forest Economy Subsidy Policies: Increase the amount of subsidies and simplify the application process. The government should introduce policies to raise subsidies, streamline procedures, and strengthen publicity and supervision to provide better services for forest farmers.
References
[1]. Wu, J., & Chen, J. (2022). Under-forest economy and high-quality agricultural development: Coupling logic and implementation pathways. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Sciences Edition), 22(4), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.13968/j.cnki.1009-9107.2022.04.16
[2]. Pu, W., & Feng, H. (2022). Research on the high-quality development path of the under-forest economy in Guizhou Province under the background of rural revitalization. Productivity Research, (7), 45-49+161. https://doi.org/10.19374/j.cnki.14-1145/f.2022.07.003
[3]. Zhang, J. (2021). Current situation and countermeasures for the development of the under-forest economy industry. Southern Agriculture, 15(26), 50-51. https://doi.org/10.19415/j.cnki.1673-890x.2021.26.024
[4]. Ling, Y. (2018). A brief discussion on the current situation and countermeasures for the development of the under-forest economy in China. Shanxi Agricultural Economics, (15), 60. https://doi.org/10.16675/j.cnki.cn14-1065/f.2018.15.035
[5]. Wang, Z., Zhang, P., & Quan, L. (2018). Research on the influencing factors of the under-forest economy industrial cluster development in Heilongjiang Province. Forestry Economics, 40(8), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2018.08.012
[6]. Lin, C., & Zhang, H. (2023). Research on the influencing factors of the development of the under-forest economy industry in Heilongjiang Province: A visual analysis based on CiteSpace. Forestry Exploration and Design, 52(2), 63-66.
Cite this article
Liu,L.;Liu,L. (2024). Research on the Influencing Factors and Development Strategies of the Under-forest Economy in Heilongjiang Province. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,119,207-215.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Economic Management and Green Development
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Wu, J., & Chen, J. (2022). Under-forest economy and high-quality agricultural development: Coupling logic and implementation pathways. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Sciences Edition), 22(4), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.13968/j.cnki.1009-9107.2022.04.16
[2]. Pu, W., & Feng, H. (2022). Research on the high-quality development path of the under-forest economy in Guizhou Province under the background of rural revitalization. Productivity Research, (7), 45-49+161. https://doi.org/10.19374/j.cnki.14-1145/f.2022.07.003
[3]. Zhang, J. (2021). Current situation and countermeasures for the development of the under-forest economy industry. Southern Agriculture, 15(26), 50-51. https://doi.org/10.19415/j.cnki.1673-890x.2021.26.024
[4]. Ling, Y. (2018). A brief discussion on the current situation and countermeasures for the development of the under-forest economy in China. Shanxi Agricultural Economics, (15), 60. https://doi.org/10.16675/j.cnki.cn14-1065/f.2018.15.035
[5]. Wang, Z., Zhang, P., & Quan, L. (2018). Research on the influencing factors of the under-forest economy industrial cluster development in Heilongjiang Province. Forestry Economics, 40(8), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2018.08.012
[6]. Lin, C., & Zhang, H. (2023). Research on the influencing factors of the development of the under-forest economy industry in Heilongjiang Province: A visual analysis based on CiteSpace. Forestry Exploration and Design, 52(2), 63-66.