Download pdf
South Korea: Becoming a Developed Nation Through Reforms and Macroeconomic Policies
- 1 Yew CHUNG INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
In the 1960s, the Republic of Korea was one of the poorest countries in the world, yet in the 2000s, the country became classified as a developed country. This paper explores South Korea’s transformation from a developing nation to a developed economy, emphasizing the role of strategic government policies, financial reforms, and the impact of the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis. The $58 billion bailout by the International Monetary Fund and subsequent reforms—corporate restructuring, banking sector overhaul, and labor market adjustments through South Korea’s Five-Year Plans—were crucial in stabilizing the economy and restoring investor confidence. This paper also analyses these interventions from both classical and Keynesian economic perspectives, highlighting how they improved market efficiency, financial discipline, and aggregate demand. The policies and plans that were included in South Korea’s dramatic change from a poor country into a developed one offer valuable insights for developing countries on financial stability and strategic policy implementation in achieving sustainable economic growth.
Keywords
structural reform, Five-Year Plans, financial crisis
[1]. Bunge, F. M. (1982) South Korea, a country study. Headquarters, Department of the Army, DA Pam 550-41.
[2]. World Bank. (2022) GDP (current US$) - Korea, Rep. World Bank Database. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=KR
[3]. Korea Development Institute. (2017) Korea Development Institute: Promoting growth, sharing prosperity. Retrieved from https://www.kdi.re.kr/res/img/brochure/KDI_brochure_eng_2017.pdf
[4]. Chung, K. H. (1974) Industrial Progress in South Korea. Asian Survey, 14(5), 439-455.
[5]. King, M. R. (2001) Who triggered the Asian financial crisis? Review of International Political Economy, 8(3), 438-466.
[6]. Lee, J. W. (2000) The aftermath of the Asian financial crisis for South Korea. The Journal of the Korean Economy, 1(1), 1-21.
[7]. Crotty, J. and Lee, K.-K. (2004) Was the IMF's imposition of economic regime change in Korea justified? A critique of the IMF's economic and political role before and after the crisis. PERI Working Papers, 77.
[8]. Haggard, S., Lim, W. and Kim, E. (2003) Economic crisis and corporate restructuring in Korea: Reforming the Chaebol. Cambridge University Press.
[9]. Banker, R. D., Chang, H. and Lee, S. Y. (2010) Differential impact of Korean banking system reforms on bank productivity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(7), 1450-1460.
[10]. Fleckenstein, T. and Lee, S. C. (2017) The politics of labor market reform in coordinated welfare capitalism: Comparing Sweden, Germany, and South Korea. World Politics, 69(1), 144-183.
[11]. Palley, T. I. (2013) Keynesian, classical and new Keynesian approaches to fiscal policy: Comparison and critique. Review of Political Economy, 25(2), 179-204.
[12]. Domjahn, T. M. (2013) What (if anything) can developing countries learn from South Korea?. Asian Culture and History, 5(2), 16-24.
Cite this article
Huang,J. (2024). South Korea: Becoming a Developed Nation Through Reforms and Macroeconomic Policies. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,141,37-43.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of ICFTBA 2024 Workshop: Finance's Role in the Just Transition
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).