Research Article
Open access
Published on 3 January 2025
Download pdf
Mi,J. (2025). An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Pesticide and Fertilizer Pollution on Household Income. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,159,88-93.
Export citation

An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Pesticide and Fertilizer Pollution on Household Income

Jia Mi *,1,
  • 1 Institute of Economics, Shandong University, No.27 South Shanda Road, Shandong, China

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.19659

Abstract

In agricultural production, agricultural non-point source pollution threatens the safety of water supply and food safety, restricts the sustainable development of the agricultural economy and rural ecological environment, and is the bottleneck of agricultural development in China. To explore the impact of this situation on the real income of rural households, the paper is based on the data from China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2014 to 2018. With the pollution status in agricultural production as the explanatory variable and the total value of household agricultural and sideline products as an explanatory variable, a fixed effect model was established to estimate the influence of fertilizer and pesticide application on labor income level. The results show that the income brought by pesticide and fertilizer input is low efficiency, and some farmers have achieved high yields with low input. In addition, the education level of the agricultural population and the size of the family had no significant effect on this. Considering the output problem, the application of pesticides and fertilizers is necessary, but the cognition that pesticides and fertilizers can increase crop yield and income makes the application of pesticides continue to increase, which is not conducive to the increase of agricultural output value. It is necessary to attach importance to new methods of increasing agricultural production based on the application of small amounts of fertilizers and pesticides and use technological reform and professional agricultural education to promote the rational use of pesticides and fertilizers and achieve rapid development of agriculture.

Keywords

agricultural non-point source pollution, household income, fixed effect model, rural revitalization

[1]. Li, S., & Shang, M. (2019). Study on the effects of agricultural pollution cognition and agricultural pollution subsidy on farmland input behavior of farmers. Science and Economy, 36(4), 51-55.

[2]. Guo, Z., & Wei, Y. (2021). Fiscal expenditure and agricultural pollution control under environmental regulation. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, (4), 73-84.

[3]. Phamova, M., et al. (2022). Can ecological farming systems positively affect household income from agriculture? A case study of the suburban area of Hanoi, Vietnam. Sustainability, 14.

[4]. Zhang, Y., Wang, A., & Huang, H. (2019). Environmental pollution, health impact and labor participation: Empirical evidence from CFPS survey. Population of Northwest China, 44(2), 81-93.

[5]. Gong, J. (2019). Research on coordinated development of green agriculture and farmers' income: From the perspective of Jiangsu Province. Future and Development, 47(12), 95-105.

[6]. Satrovic, E., Abul, S. J., & Al-Kandari, A. (2022). Modeling the dynamic linkages between agriculture, electricity consumption, income and pollutant emissions for Southeastern Europe. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies.

[7]. Delgado, C. L., & Siamwalla, A. (1997). Rural economy and farm income diversification in developing countries. MTID Discussion Papers.

[8]. Li, M., & Hou, Q. (2020). Do farmers' income growth and agricultural non-point source pollution in Gansu Province show an inverted "U" shape? Productivity Research, (11), 46-50+67.

[9]. Cao, Y., & Zhu, H. (2002). Effect analysis of airport economy in promoting regional economic growth: An empirical study based on panel data fixed effect model. Logistics Technology, 45(4), 99-106.

[10]. Abubakari, K., et al. (2023). Toward e-agriculture in Ghana: Effect of mobile phone access and usage on household crop income. Cogent Food & Agriculture.

[11]. Belay, A., et al. (2023). Does climate-smart agriculture improve household income and food security? Evidence from Southern Ethiopia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-28.

[12]. Bloem, J. R., & Farris, J. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic and food security in low- and middle-income countries: A review. Agriculture & Food Security, 11(1), 55.

Cite this article

Mi,J. (2025). An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Pesticide and Fertilizer Pollution on Household Income. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,159,88-93.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Business and Policy Studies

Conference website: https://2025.confbps.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-879-6(Print) / 978-1-83558-880-2(Online)
Conference date: 20 February 2025
Editor:Canh Thien Dang
Series: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Volume number: Vol.159
ISSN:2754-1169(Print) / 2754-1177(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).