The Impact of Behavioural Biases on Attitudes and Intentions of Institutional and Retail Investors Towards ESG Investing

Ziyun Ding

doi:10.54254/2754-1169/2025.21513

Research Article

Open access

Published on 13 March 2025

Download pdf

Ding,Z. (2025). The Impact of Behavioural Biases on Attitudes and Intentions of Institutional and Retail Investors Towards ESG Investing. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,168,58-64.

Export citation

The Impact of Behavioural Biases on Attitudes and Intentions of Institutional and Retail Investors Towards ESG Investing

Ziyun Ding *^,1,

¹ The University of Edinburgh

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.21513

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of behavioral biases on the attitudes and intentions of both institutional and retail investors towards Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing. Behavioral biases, such as loss aversion, overconfidence, and confirmation bias, can significantly influence investment decisions, often leading to irrational behavior in the face of complex and uncertain information related to ESG factors. By avoiding behavioral biases, investors can more easily make rational decisions based on available data and logical processes. This study primarily focuses on overconfidence and the disposition effect, emphasizing how these biases affect investors' perceptions. Additionally, the paper underscores the importance of recognizing and addressing behavioral biases and outlines methods to do so. The study shows that behavioral biases, particularly representativeness bias, significantly influence retail investors, often leading them to make decisions against market trends and potentially resulting in losses. In contrast, while institutional investors are also subject to behavioral biases, their expertise enables them to effectively mitigate or even leverage these biases to achieve positive outcomes. Ultimately, the paper calls for further research into the ways that behavioral finance can inform practices that enhance the adoption of sustainable investment strategies among all types of investors.

Keywords

Behavioural Biases, ESG investing, Overconfidence,Disposition effect

View pdf

References

[1]. Upadhyaya, C., Khan, S., Sandanshive, V., & Awasthi, M. G. (2023). A study of impact of behavioural factors on ESG investment. The journal of contemporary issues in business and government, 29(1), 546-553.

[2]. Shefrin, H. (2024). ESG and Behavioral Finance: Why ESG-Investing is Primarily a Psychological Phenomenon. Available at SSRN.

[3]. Gunathilaka, R. C., & Fernando, J. M. (2021). Do behavioral biases differ among institutional and individual investors?. Accounting & Finance/Oblik i Fìnansi, (92).

[4]. Aigbovo, O., & Ilaboya, O. J. (2019). Does behavioural biases influences individual investment decisions. Management Science Review, 10(1), 68-89.

[5]. Deka, J., Sharma, M., Agarwal, N., & Tiwari, K. (2023). Linking ESG-Investing Consciousness, Behavioral Biases, and Risk-Perception: Scale Validation with Specifics of Indian Retail Investors. European Journal of Business Science and Technology, 71-91.

[6]. Nofsinger, J. R. (2022). The psychology of investing (7th ed.). Routledge.

[7]. Broihanne, M. H., Merli, M., & Roger, P. (2014). Overconfidence, risk perception and the risk-taking behavior of finance professionals. Finance Research Letters, 11(2), 64-73.

[8]. Hsu, Y., & Shiu, C. Y. (2010). The overconfidence of investors in the primary market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 18(2), 217-239.

[9]. Chen, G., Kim, K. A., Nofsinger, J. R., & Rui, O. M. (2007). Trading performance, disposition effect, overconfidence, representativeness bias, and experience of emerging market investors. Journal of behavioral decision making, 20(4), 425-451.

[10]. Feng, L., & Seasholes, M. S. (2005). Do investor sophistication and trading experience eliminate behavioral biases in financial markets?. Review of finance, 9(3), 305-351.

[11]. ELAHI, A. R., IQBAL, A., MINHAS, B. A., & ASHFAQ, F. (2023). THE BEHAVIOR RISK BIASES AND SUSTAINABLE INVESTMENT DECISION. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(3), 74-88.

[12]. Bodnaruk, A., & Simonov, A. (2015). Do financial experts make better investment decisions?. Journal of financial Intermediation, 24(4), 514-536.

[13]. Ahmad, Z., Ibrahim, H., & Tuyon, J. (2017). Institutional investor behavioral biases: syntheses of theory and evidence. Management Research Review, 40(5), 578-603.

[14]. Maheshwari, H., Samantaray, A. K., & Jena, J. R. (2023). Unravelling behavioural biases in individual and institutional investors investment decision-making: intersection of bibliometric and systematic literature review. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 12(3), 275-299.

Cite this article

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Business and Policy Studies

Conference website: https://2025.confbps.org/

ISBN：978-1-83558-991-5(Print) / 978-1-83558-992-2(Online)

Conference date: 20 February 2025

Editor：Canh Thien Dang

Series: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences

Volume number: Vol.168

ISSN：2754-1169(Print) / 2754-1177(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).