Download pdf
Explaining Opinion Dynamics in Online Social Media: A Comparison of Attitudes Toward Climate Change Across U.S. States
- 1 San Marino High School
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This study explores the factors that may influence public perceptions of climate change by linking various datasets from the United States. It aims to identify patterns among climate change deniers within social media data. The outcome variable in this project is the percentage of climate change denial (people denying that climate change is man-made) in each state on Twitter. Explanatory variables include GDP per capita, gender, and local temperature. The study utilises Python and R programming languages for descriptive analyses and statistical modelling based on large-scale digital trace data. Additionally, the analysis involves constructing both an ordinary least squares regression model and one-way and two-way fixed-effects models. Secondary datasets are collected to measure the variables, and these datasets are merged at the state level. The findings suggest that states with higher GDP per capita tend to have more people acknowledging on social media that climate change is influenced by human activity. However, the effect of GDP per capita on climate change denial is extremely small, and it does not correlate with the unmeasured fixed effects that influence the proportion of denial-related tweets. Moreover, gender shows no statistically significant correlation with climate change perceptions based on our data-driven research. On the other hand, higher local median temperatures in a state are associated with a greater likelihood of citizens forming personal beliefs that humans contribute significantly to climate change. This research can facilitate social media platform moderation and assist the government in identifying the geographic distribution of climate change denial, thereby fostering a more united community to combat climate change.
Keywords
Climate Change, Opinion Dynamics, Social Media, Fixed-Effects Regression, United States
[1]. Sathaye J, Shukla PR, Ravindranath NH. Climate change, sustainable development and India: global and national concerns. Curr Sci. 2006;90(3):314-25. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24091865
[2]. Werndl C. On defining climate and climate change. Br J Philos Sci. 2016;67(2):337-64. doi:10.1093/bjps/axu048
[3]. Wigley TML, Jones PD, Raper SCB. The observed global warming record: what does it tell us? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(16):8314-20.
[4]. Weber EU. What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. 2010;1(3):332-42. doi:10.1002/wcc.41
[5]. Bodansky D. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: a commentary. Yale J Int Law. 1993;18:451-558.
[6]. Agrawala S. Context and early origins of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Clim Change. 1998;39:605-20. doi:10.1023/a:1005312331477
[7]. Cook J, Oreskes N, Doran PT, Anderegg WR, Verheggen B, Maibach EW, et al. Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environ Res Lett. 2016;11(4):048002.
[8]. Dawsey J, Rucker P, Dennis B, Mooney C. Trump on climate change: ‘People like myself, we have very high levels of intelligence but we’re not necessarily such believers.’ The Washington Post [Internet]. 2018 Nov 27 [cited 2025 Mar 16]. Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-on-climate-change-people-like-myself-we-have-very-high-levels-of-intelligence-but-were-not-necessarily-such-believers/2018/11/27/722f0184-f27e-11e8-aeea-b85fd44449f5_story.html
[9]. Poushter J, Fagan M, Huang C. Americans are less concerned – but more divided – on climate change than people elsewhere. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2021.
[10]. Treen KM, Williams HT, O’Neill SJ. Online misinformation about climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. 2020;11(5):e665.
[11]. Cook J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA, Richardson M, Winkler B, Painting R, et al. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ Res Lett. 2013;8(2):024024. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
[12]. Zhang H, Dai H, Lai H, Wang W. U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement: reasons, impacts, and China’s response. Adv Clim Change Res. 2017;8(4):220-5. doi:10.1016/j.accre.2017.09.002
[13]. ]Funk C. Key findings: how Americans’ attitudes about climate change differ by generation, party and other factors [Internet]. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2021 May 26 [cited 2025 Mar 16].
[14]. Dempsey C. Tracking public perception about climate change [Internet]. Geography Realm; 2015 Apr 14 [cited 2025 Mar 16]. Available from: https://www.geographyrealm.com/tracking-public-perception-about-climate-change/
[15]. McCright AM, Dunlap RE. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol Q. 2011;52(2):155-194. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
[16]. Lübke C. Socioeconomic roots of climate change denial and uncertainty among the European population. Eur Sociol Rev. 2022;38(1):153-168.
[17]. Khatibi FS, Dedekorkut-Howes A, Howes M, Torabi E. Can public awareness, knowledge and engagement improve climate change adaptation policies? Discov Sustain. 2021;2:1-24.
[18]. Tol RS. Correction and update: the economic effects of climate change. J Econ Perspect. 2014;28(2):221-226. doi:10.1257/jep.28.2.221
[19]. Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol Lett. 2012;15(4):365-377. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x
[20]. Hardy JT. Climate change: causes, effects, and solutions. Chichester (UK): Wiley; 2006.
[21]. Paavola J. Health impacts of climate change and health and social inequalities in the UK. Environ Health. 2017;16(S1). doi:10.1186/s12940-017-0328-z
[22]. Yu H, Wang B, Zhang YJ, Wang S, Wei YM. Public perception of climate change in China: results from the questionnaire survey. Nat Hazards. 2013;69(1):459-472. doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0711-1
[23]. Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabási AL, Brewer D, et al. Computational social science. Science. 2009;323(5915):721-723. doi:10.1126/science.1167742
[24]. Kompas T, Pham VH, Che TN. The effects of climate change on GDP by country and the global economic gains from complying with the Paris Climate Accord. Earth S Future. 2018;6(8):1153-1173. doi:10.1029/2018ef000922
[25]. Alston M. Gender mainstreaming and climate change. Womens Stud Int Forum. 2014;47:287-294. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2013.01.016
[26]. Schalatek L. Gender and climate finance: double mainstreaming for sustainable development. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation; 2009.
[27]. Mostafa MM. Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ green purchase behaviour: the effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. Int J Consum Stud. 2006;31(3):220-229. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00523.x
[28]. Lake IR, Gillespie IA, Bentham G, Nichols GL, Lane C, Adak GK, Threlfall EJ. A re-evaluation of the impact of temperature and climate change on foodborne illness. Epidemiol Infect. 2009;137(11):1538-1547. doi:10.1017/s0950268809002477
[29]. Effrosynidis D, Karasakalidis AI, Sylaios G, Arampatzis A. The climate change twitter dataset. Expert Syst Appl. 2022;204:117541. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117541
[30]. Roberts D. US GDP by state 1997-2020. Kaggle. 2021 Jun 19. Available from: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/davidbroberts/us-gdp-by-state-19972020
[31]. McDonald J, Maclnnis B, Krosnick JA. Climate insights 2020: Opinion in the States. Resources for the Future. 2020 Oct 26. Available from: https://www.rff.org/publications/reports/climateinsights2020-opinion-in-the-states/
[32]. Ballew M, Marlon J, Leiserowitz A, Maibach E. Gender differences in public understanding of climate change. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. 2018 Dec 12. Available from: https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/gender-differences-in-public-understanding-of-climate-change/#:~:text=A%20large%20body%20of%20research, pro%2Dclimate%20opinions%20and%20beliefs
[33]. Belief in climate change was found to be influenced by the local weather. University of Oxford. 2016 Dec 21. Available from: https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2016-12-21-belief-climate-change-found-be-influenced-local-weather#:~:text=‘A%20belief%20in%20global%20climate, the%20Oxford%20Martin%20School%20at
Cite this article
Huang,K. (2025). Explaining Opinion Dynamics in Online Social Media: A Comparison of Attitudes Toward Climate Change Across U.S. States. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,175,1-13.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Business and Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).