Digital Infrastructure and Corporate Intelligence

Research Article
Open access

Digital Infrastructure and Corporate Intelligence

Jiayi Zhang 1*
  • 1 Institute of Business, Dalian University of Foreign Languages, Lushun South Road, Dalian, China    
  • *corresponding author 2904780665@qq.com
Published on 10 April 2025 | https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.21987
AEMPS Vol.175
ISSN (Print): 2754-1177
ISSN (Online): 2754-1169
ISBN (Print): 978-1-80590-045-0
ISBN (Online): 978-1-80590-046-7

Abstract

With continuous progress in information technology, the construction of digital infrastructure has become a key force in promoting corporate intelligence. This study in-depth explores and analyzes the mechanism by which digital infrastructure promotes the intelligent transformation of enterprises. The research finds that digital infrastructure significantly promotes the intelligence of enterprises, and technology spillover, talent cultivation, and market orientation significantly enhance the positive effect of digital infrastructure on corporate intelligence. The research conclusion points out that digital infrastructure is the cornerstone for enterprises to explore the potential of intelligence. Enterprises should actively embrace digital transformation and inject strong momentum into the intelligent transformation of enterprises through formulating forward-looking technical strategies and upgrading plans. Looking to the future, the deep integration of digital infrastructure and corporate intelligence will drive the innovation of the entire economic ecosystem and have a profound impact on the sustainable development of enterprises and the competitive pattern of the industry.

Keywords:

Digital Infrastructure, Corporate Intelligence, Technology Spillover, Market Orientation, Industry Competition

Zhang,J. (2025). Digital Infrastructure and Corporate Intelligence. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,175,142-151.
Export citation

1. Introduction

Digital infrastructure refers to the new generation of information infrastructure construction that reflects the characteristics of the digital economy, covering areas such as the 5G Internet, data centers, artificial intelligence, and the industrial Internet. In recent years, with the country's call to accelerate the construction of new infrastructure such as industrial Internet and data centers, promoting digital infrastructure has become a top priority in all work. In recent years, the application fields of digital infrastructure have continuously expanded, and various industries have improved the internal operational efficiency and service quality of enterprises and promoted industrial upgrading and innovation by strengthening digital infrastructure. As various industries and fields continue to deepen the application of digital infrastructure, the scale of the digital economy continues to expand, and the proportion of the digital economy in global GDP increases annually. Digital infrastructure not only promotes the development of enterprises, but also injects new momentum into global economic growth.

In a fiercely competitive market environment, enterprises must focus on the development of intelligence to maintain competitive advantage. Intelligent and automated production processes can improve production efficiency, reduce costs, and enhance product quality. Big data analysis and machine learning technologies enable enterprises to deeply mine and analyze consumer data, thereby launching targeted products and services to enhance their competitive advantages. Information management can improve the management level of enterprises and achieve real-time monitoring of enterprise operating conditions, thereby quickly finding problems and improving management efficiency. Intelligence, as the key to enhancing enterprise competitiveness and the trend of modern human civilization development, how to achieve enterprise intelligence has undoubtedly become a hot spot in academic research.

Digital infrastructure is the cornerstone of promoting enterprise intelligence. With the development of the digital age, the establishment of a sound digital infrastructure has become a necessary way for enterprises to achieve intelligence. Enterprises can realize the interconnection of equipment through the Internet of Things technology, thereby achieving real-time monitoring and remote control of equipment and improving production efficiency and product quality. The high-speed and low-latency networks realized by 5G technology also provide important support for enterprises to establish a more intelligent supply chain management system and precisely coordinate raw material procurement and inventory management. In addition, the rapid development of 5G technology brings more possibilities for enterprise intelligence and provides a strong guarantee for building a widely covered and highly efficient industrial IoT. Edge computing platforms based on 5G networks can also result in faster and more accurate data processing and more decision support for enterprises, accelerating their intelligent transformation. It can be seen that the frontier technologies of digital infrastructure represented by the IoT and 5G play an important supporting role in the intelligent transformation of enterprises and are indispensable in the process of realizing enterprise intelligence.

In summary, digital infrastructure, as an important infrastructure supporting intelligence, plays a key role in promoting enterprise intelligence. Therefore, exploring the impact of digital infrastructure on EI is of practical significance. Compared with existing research, the innovation of this study mainly lies in the in-depth exploration of the promoting effect of digital infrastructure on enterprise intelligence, combining practical case analysis to explore how digital infrastructure is applied in the process of enterprise intelligence, and exploring the theoretical mechanism of digital infrastructure to help enterprise intelligence.

2. Literature Review

Corporate intelligence refers to the use of advanced information technologies such as artificial intelligence, big data, and the Internet of Things by enterprises to achieve intelligent upgrades in production, management, and operations, thereby improving efficiency, reducing costs, optimizing decision-making, and enhancing the competitiveness and innovation capability of enterprises.As a trend of modern human civilization development, how to achieve enterprise intelligence is undoubtedly the top priority and has become a hot topic in academic research. For example, talent introduction policies have prompted enterprises to increase investment in industrial robots and promote intelligence in manufacturing [1]. Disruptive technological innovation has become an important method for Chinese equipment manufacturing enterprises to achieve intelligent transformation [2]. Wang Chang believes that the use of the industrial Internet has a significant effect on the intelligent transformation of manufacturing enterprises. Integrated interconnection ability promotes enterprise interconnection and realizes intelligent transformation, while collaborative integration ability promotes internal and external collaboration among enterprises and realizes intelligent transformation [3]. By exploring the driving mechanism of market turmoil on the intelligent transformation of enterprises, the application boundary of technological innovation theory and strategic flexibility theory in the context of Chinese intelligent manufacturing is expanded, providing practical insights for the path selection of enterprise intelligent transformation [4]. Wang Fan believes that using digital innovation to promote the intelligent transformation of enterprises has become a new kinetic energy to promote the deep integration of the real economy and the digital economy and to accelerate the construction of digital China [5].

The prominent problem of enterprise intelligence at present is cost pressure, which has also attracted the attention of scholars worldwide. For example, in the early stage of technological industrial development, the deployment cost of artificial intelligence technology is high.In the industrial field, the original equipment sensitivity or data acquisition accuracy often cannot support the application of intelligent algorithms, such as parameter optimization and fault diagnosis, and it is necessary to upgrade and transform the equipment, which also incurs a certain input cost. Especially in the current economic downturn, the enterprise budget is reduced, which further increases the cost input pressure of enterprises to carry out intelligent upgrades [6]. Therefore, financial support is an important factor in promoting enterprise intelligence. Yang Zibo believes that the government should be committed to solving the market failure of intelligent manufacturing financing for small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises. On the one hand, it should create conditions conducive to the intelligent transformation of manufacturing enterprises and encourage various financial institutions and social capital to provide loans and financing support for the intelligent transformation of manufacturing enterprises. On the other hand, it should actively support the development of management consulting institutions for small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises, provide help and training for the financing decision-making and risk control of small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises' intelligent transformation, and assist small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises to better carry out financing decision-making and risk control [7]. It can be seen that financial institutions lack depth and level in serving enterprise intelligence and need to actively provide financing support to effectively alleviate the cost pressure of enterprise intelligence.

Combing the literature, it is found that there are still many fields worthy of exploration and research on the promotion of enterprise intelligence by digital infrastructure. For example, at present, although the digitalization and networking of enterprise equipment in China have a certain foundation, the interconnection of underlying equipment and process control layer is still the key and difficult point that needs to be broken through. Therefore, the digital infrastructure of "human-machine-thing" interconnection will become the mainstream of enterprise intelligence and become a new mode to promote enterprise intelligence [8]. Especially, in fact, digital infrastructure plays a supporting role in comprehensively and systematically promoting the intelligent transformation of enterprises. It can not only improve the efficiency of industrial operation but also break the information barriers and "data islands" between organizations and improve the efficiency of industrial operation, which is of great significance to enterprise intelligence. In summary, although the existing literature focuses on other factors that promote enterprise intelligence, there are few discussions on the theoretical mechanism of digital infrastructure to help enterprise intelligence.

3. Mechanism Analysis

This study found that digital infrastructure has a significant positive impact on enterprise intelligence. Specifically, digital infrastructure promotes enterprise intelligence through technology spillovers and market orientation. Digital infrastructure makes data collection and analysis more convenient.

Digital infrastructure, by integrating cutting-edge technologies such as 5G, big data, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence, significantly enhances data processing and analysis capabilities. It drives innovation in intelligent production and management models, promoting the diversified development of business models. This, in turn, realizes the strong driving effect of technological innovation on enterprise intelligence, leading to a comprehensive improvement in operational efficiency, management levels, and economic benefits. Based on the above analysis, this study proposes the following theoretical hypothesis:

Hypothesis 1: Digital infrastructure promotes enterprise intelligence through technological innovation effect.

Technology convergence refers to mutual penetration, intersection, and integration between technology fields. By integrating various technologies, new systems or applications are formed to improve efficiency and innovation ability. Digital infrastructure, through the deep integration and synergistic effect of advanced technologies such as cloud computing, big data, artificial intelligence, and the Internet of Things, has significantly improved the intelligent level of enterprises, including optimizing decision-making, resource allocation, security protection, and innovation ability, to promote the efficient, safe and sustainable development of enterprises. Based on the above analysis, this study proposes the following theoretical hypothesis:

Hypothesis 2: Digital infrastructure promotes enterprise intelligence through technology convergence effect.

4. Variable Measurement

Degree of Corporate Intelligence Referring to the approach of Li Wan-Hong et al. [5], this study constructs a measurement index system for the degree of corporate intelligence transformation based on two dimensions: the intensity of intelligent fund investment and the application of intelligent technology decision-making, to measure the degree of intelligence transformation of new energy vehicle industry listed companies. Digital Infrastructure According to the existing literature on digital infrastructure, this study selects the number of digital infrastructure enterprises in various provinces from 2017 to 2022 as the research sample interval, and processes the data as follows: Specifically, the seven indicators come from different levels, and there are significant differences in the dimensions and magnitudes of the indicator values. Therefore, these indicators at different levels must be normalized before they have horizontal comparability and practicability, and the accuracy of the final estimated index can be guaranteed. The processing methods for the positive and negative attribute indicators are as follows:

\( Positive:{x_{ij}}=\frac{{x_{ij}}-min{\lbrace {x_{j}}\rbrace }}{max{\lbrace {x_{j}}\rbrace }-min{\lbrace {x_{j}}\rbrace }} \)

\( Negative:{x_{ij}}=\frac{max\lbrace {x_{j}}\rbrace -{x_{ij}}}{max\lbrace {x_{j}}\rbrace -min\lbrace {x_{j}}\rbrace } \)

where max{xj} is the maximum value of the indicator in all years, min{xj} is the minimum value of the indicator in all years, and xij is the result obtained after normalizing the indicator. The final result is calculated using the objective weight of each indicator and added to obtain the number of digital infrastructures. Model Specification This study uses the two-way fixed effects model to study the impact of digital infrastructure on corporate intelligence and constructs the following benchmark regression model:

AIit = β1Digiit0KContorlititit

Where, AI represents the degree of corporate intelligence, Digi represents digital infrastructure, Control represents control variables, i represents enterprises, t represents years, μi is the individual fixed effect, λt is the time fixed effect, and ϵit is the random disturbance term.

Table 1: Model Specification

First-level Indicators

Second-level Indicators

Variables

Units

Attributes

Digital Economy Development Carriers

Traditional Infrastructure

Internet broadband access ports

Ten thousand

+

Internet broadband access users

Ten thousand households

+

Number of domains per thousand people

Ten thousand

+

Number of websites per thousand people

Ten thousand

+

New-type Digital Infrastructure

Electronic information industry fixed investment

Billion yuan

+

Mobile phone base station number

Ten thousand

+

IPV4/IPV6 address number

Ten thousand

+

5. Empirical Results Analysis

5.1. Descriptive Statistics

Descriptive statistics for the main variables in this study are shown in Table 2. The results in Table 2 show that the mean value of the explained variable, the degree of corporate intelligence, is 0.082, which is greater than the median, indicating that a considerable number of enterprises are still undergoing intelligent transformation at this stage. The mean value of the explanatory variable, digital infrastructure, is 0.079, indicating that the level of digital infrastructure in the sample enterprises is relatively low and urgently requires the development and application of digital technology. Revenue, enterprise size, asset-liability ratio, industry concentration, and asset structure all show significant differences among the different samples, indicating that the samples have a good distinguishing effect.

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics.

VarName

Obs

Mean

SD

Median

P25

P75

Min

Max

intelligence

48156

82.280

102.813

45.882

4.899

116.863

0.000

672.147

digitalc

40919

0.079

0.070

0.058

0.033

0.099

0.003

0.703

income2

48125

94.479

693.851

15.375

6.218

41.924

-1.149

33181.680

size

48153

21.953

1.408

21.798

21.020

22.724

10.842

28.636

lev

48125

0.494

4.336

0.422

0.261

0.587

-0.195

877.256

HHI_A

47492

0.199

0.178

0.140

0.091

0.224

0.031

1.000

tang

47735

0.365

0.183

0.353

0.230

0.487

0.000

0.975

5.2. Benchmark Regression Results

The basic regression results are presented in Table 3. Column (1) controls for the individual fixed effect without adding control variables, column (2) controls for both the individual and time fixed effect without adding control variables, column (3) controls for the individual fixed effects with the inclusion of control variables, and column (4) controls for both the individual and time fixed effect with the inclusion of control variables. The results show that digital infrastructure significantly promotes the intelligence of enterprises under different model settings, column(1)(3)(4)with an impact at the 1% significance level, and column(2)with an impact at the 10% significance level. In the individual fixed effect model without adding control variables, every unit of digital infrastructure increases the enterprise's intelligence level by an average of 0.031 units. In the double fixed effect model without adding control variables, for every unit increase in digital infrastructure, the average level of enterprise intelligence increases by 0.002 units. In the individual fixed effect model with the inclusion of control variables, every unit of digital infrastructure increases the enterprise's intelligence level by an average of 0.035 units. In the double fixed effect model with the inclusion of control variables, for every unit increase in digital infrastructure, the average level of enterprise intelligence increases by 0.004 units.

Table 3: Benchmark Regression.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

intelligence

intelligence

intelligence

intelligence

lndigitalc

31.313***

2.272*

34.830***

3.562***

(0.909)

(1.183)

(0.999)

(1.147)

income2

0.004***

0.002**

(0.001)

(0.001)

size

3.978***

-11.995***

(0.485)

(0.574)

lev

0.182***

0.073

(0.067)

(0.063)

HHI_A

-8.100***

-8.499***

(2.825)

(2.682)

tang

130.733***

153.049***

(2.929)

(2.788)

_cons

173.525***

-4.630

50.432***

182.121***

(2.600)

(4.432)

(12.222)

(12.669)

year

No

Yes

No

Yes

code

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N

40919.000

40919.000

40050.000

40050.000

r2

0.032

0.114

0.086

0.195

5.3. Robustness Test

Lag Effect Considering that the promoting effect of digital infrastructure on corporate intelligence is affected by environmental transmission and that there is a time lag effect in this impact, a robustness test is carried out by taking the value of the dependent variable one-period lag and introducing the lag effect. The estimation results in column (1) of Table 4 show that, after introducing the lag effect, digital infrastructure still has a significant promoting effect on the intelligent transformation of enterprises, indicating that the benchmark regression results are robust.

Change the Window Period The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the operations of global enterprises. Therefore, a robustness test was conducted by removing the sample data after 2020. The results are shown in Column (3) of Table 4. Digital infrastructure is significantly positive at the 1% level, further verifying the robustness of the conclusions.

Adding the omitted variables of company age and return on equity, the results shown in Table 4 column (3) show that digital infrastructure is still significantly positive at the 10% level, further verifying the robustness of the research conclusion.

Table 4: Robustness Test.

(1)

(2)

(3)

intelligence

intelligence

intelligence

lndigitalc

2.732**

5.510***

3.844***

(2.390)

(3.659)

(3.332)

income2

0.001

0.004**

0.002**

(1.252)

(2.466)

(1.974)

size

-3.879***

-12.831***

-11.288***

(-6.774)

(-18.892)

(-18.224)

lev

-0.045

0.047

-0.305

(-0.718)

(0.700)

(-0.114)

HHI_A

-10.737***

-6.501**

-6.992***

(-4.019)

(-2.114)

(-2.629)

tang

108.928***

146.615***

155.032***

(39.199)

(45.357)

(53.777)

age

0.000

(.)

roe

-0.109

(-1.062)

_cons

146.068***

326.892***

289.240***

(11.256)

(21.118)

(20.876)

year

Yes

Yes

Yes

code

Yes

Yes

Yes

N

39470.000

31493.000

39171.000

r2

0.762

0.741

0.759

r2_a

0.735

0.709

0.731

5.4. Mediator Effect Test

In the mediator effect model shown in Table 5, The results in column (1) show that digital infrastructure and technological innovation are significantly positively correlated at the 5% confidence level; the results in column (2) indicate that digital infrastructure and technology integration are significantly positively correlated at the 1% confidence level. This suggests that there is a partial mediating effect between technological innovation and technology integration on the relationship between digital infrastructure and corporate intelligent transformation. Companies can enhance their digital infrastructure to accelerate technological innovation and integration, thereby promoting their degree of intelligent transformation. Therefore, Hypothesis 1 and Hypothesis 2 are verified.

Table 5: Mediator Effect Test.

(1)

(2)

innovation

convergence

lndigitalc

0.035**

0.092***

(2.004)

(4.735)

income2

0.000***

-0.000***

(3.442)

(-7.670)

size

0.068***

0.057***

(7.707)

(4.260)

lev

0.001

0.087*

(1.348)

(1.773)

HHI_A

-0.236***

-0.027

(-5.722)

(-0.532)

tang

0.146***

-0.097*

(3.412)

(-1.725)

_cons

-0.290

-0.996***

(-1.485)

(-3.443)

year

code

N

Yes

Yes

39026.000

Yes

Yes

15182.000

r2

0.036

0.109

5.5. Heterogeneity Analysis

The proportion of the digital economy in the global GDP is increasing year by year. This study expects that international enterprises, because they are more affected by international situations, will pay more attention to the development of digital infrastructure and corporate intelligence, and that the promoting effect of digital infrastructure on corporate intelligence will be more prominent. Therefore, this study examines the differentiated impact of digital infrastructure on the intelligence of international and non-international enterprises by grouping. The results in Table 6 show that the regression coefficient of digital infrastructure on the degree of corporate intelligence for international enterprises is 0.710 and is significantly positive at the 1% confidence level, while the corresponding coefficient for non-international enterprises is -1.783, also significant at the 1% confidence level but negative.

The business of international enterprises is often spread across many countries and regions around the world, facing a more complex and changing market environment and fierce international competition. In this context, international enterprises pay more attention to using digital infrastructure to improve their intelligence levels to better cope with the challenges of the international market. Therefore, the degree of internationalization strengthens the positive promoting effect of digital infrastructure on corporate intelligence to a certain extent, allowing digital infrastructure to play a greater role in international enterprises and significantly improve the degree of corporate intelligence. Unlike international enterprises, the business of non-international enterprises is mainly concentrated in the domestic market, the market environment they face is relatively stable, and competitive pressure is relatively small. This may lead to non-international enterprises not paying enough attention to digital infrastructure and not investing enough, and thus, fail to fully exert the role of digital infrastructure in the intelligent transformation of enterprises.

Table 6: Heterogeneity Analysis.

(1)

(2)

International

Non-international

lndigitalc

3.640**

-20.201***

(2.276)

(-21.031)

income2

-0.001

0.009***

(-0.440)

(9.899)

size

-15.652***

0.688

(-17.499)

(1.300)

lev

5.644***

0.121

(7.441)

(1.093)

HHI_A

4.716

-0.456

(1.214)

(-0.126)

tang

191.601***

158.981***

(44.286)

(42.710)

_cons

227.524***

-165.470***

(11.189)

(-13.786)

year

code

N

Yes

Yes

18254

Yes

No

21786

R2

0.203

0.148

Adj. R2

0.075

0.148

6. Conclusion and Suggestions

In recent years, although the existing literature has focused on other factors that promote corporate intelligence, few have discussed the theoretical mechanism of digital infrastructure to help corporate intelligence. After empirical analysis through a two-way fixed effects model, robustness analysis, intermediate effect test, and heterogeneity analysis, this study proves that digital infrastructure has a significant promoting effect on corporate intelligence.

Technical innovation and internationalization play a partially mediating role between digital infrastructure and intelligent corporate transformation. Digital infrastructure not only directly affects the degree of corporate intelligence but also indirectly affects the degree of corporate intelligence by improving the level of technology spillover and internationalization . This mediating mechanism reveals the deep impact of digital infrastructure on the intelligent transformation of enterprises and provides theoretical support for enterprises on how to effectively use digital infrastructure in the process of digital transformation.

The degree of internationalization plays a significant regulatory role between digital infrastructure and intelligent corporate transformation. Specifically, due to the complex market environment and technological advantages of international enterprises, the promoting effect of digital infrastructure on their intelligent transformation is stronger, whereas for non-international enterprises, due to the stable market environment and lack of technical talent, the promoting effect of digital infrastructure on their intelligent transformation is weaker, and even the opposite situation may occur. This regulatory mechanism provides beneficial insights for enterprises on how to better use digital infrastructure to promote intelligent transformation under different international strategies.

According to the above research conclusions, to improve the level of digital infrastructure and promote the intelligent transformation and upgrading of enterprises, this paper puts forward the following suggestions for enterprises: First, enterprises should pay attention to the development and improvement of digital infrastructure. With the rapid development of the digital economy, the digital infrastructure has become a key factor for enterprises to achieve sustainable development. Enterprises should pay attention to the construction of digital infrastructure, increase investment, continuously improve the digital infrastructure system, and enhance the overall competitiveness of enterprises to achieve sustainable development. Second, enterprises should accelerate the establishment and improvement of information systems and digital platforms. Digital infrastructure can improve enterprises’ information levels and provide strong technical support. By improving the digital infrastructure, enterprises can better manage and use data resources and improve their level of informatization. In the era of the digital economy, digital infrastructure has become the cornerstone of enterprise development. By improving the level of digital infrastructure, enterprises can improve operational efficiency, optimize business processes, reduce management costs, and thus stand out in fierce market competition and achieve sustainable development. Third, enterprises should keep pace with the times of digitalization and promote the intelligent process of enterprises. With the development of artificial intelligence and big data technology, enterprise intelligence has become a future trend. Digital infrastructure helps improve the intelligence level of enterprises, provides rich data resources and strong computing power for enterprises, helps enterprises build intelligent systems and applications, and realizes intelligent upgrading.


References

[1]. Yu Minggui, He Mengmeng, Zhang Mengmeng. Talent Introduction Policy, Labor Optimization and Allocation and the Intelligence of Manufacturing [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2024, (05): 116-134.

[2]. Yang Jin, Tong Zhiwen. How Disruptive Technological Innovation Drives the Intelligent Transformation of Equipment Manufacturing Enterprises? [J]. Technology Economics, 2024, 43 (05): 82-94.

[3]. Wang Chang, Deng Chan, He Qi, Zhou Yifang. How Does the Use of Industrial Internet Promote the Intelligent Transformation of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: Driving Factors and Empowerment Mechanism [J]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2024, 41 (03): 103-113.

[4]. Wang Cizhi, Feng Jialin, Sun Zhongjuan, Xie Wei. The Threshold Effect of Market Turbulence on Enterprise Intelligent Transformation [J]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2023, 40 (09): 84-94.

[5]. Li Wan-Hong, Wang Fan. Digital Innovation, Strategic Flexibility and Enterprise Intelligent Transformation - Considering the Moderating Effect of Environmental Complexity [J]. Research in Science and Technology, 2023, 41 (03): 521-533.

[6]. Han Qiuming, Wang Shuhua, Yang Xuecheng, Li Jingwang. The Development Mechanism, Influencing Factors and Countermeasures of Industrial Intelligence - A Qualitative Study Based on Industry Expert Interviews [J]. China Science and Technology Forum, 2021, (08): 59-69.

[7]. Yang Zibo, Yang Lanqiao. The Dilemma and Solutions of Intelligent Transformation of Small and Medium-sized Manufacturing Enterprises in China [J]. Zhongzhou Academic Journal, 2020, (08): 25-31.

[8]. Yang Zhuofan. The Mode, Shortcomings and Countermeasures of Industrial Digital Transformation in China [J]. China's Circulation Economy, 2020, 34 (07): 60-67.


Cite this article

Zhang,J. (2025). Digital Infrastructure and Corporate Intelligence. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,175,142-151.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Business and Policy Studies

ISBN:978-1-80590-045-0(Print) / 978-1-80590-046-7(Online)
Editor:Canh Thien Dang
Conference website: https://www.confbps.org/
Conference date: 20 February 2025
Series: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Volume number: Vol.175
ISSN:2754-1169(Print) / 2754-1177(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Yu Minggui, He Mengmeng, Zhang Mengmeng. Talent Introduction Policy, Labor Optimization and Allocation and the Intelligence of Manufacturing [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2024, (05): 116-134.

[2]. Yang Jin, Tong Zhiwen. How Disruptive Technological Innovation Drives the Intelligent Transformation of Equipment Manufacturing Enterprises? [J]. Technology Economics, 2024, 43 (05): 82-94.

[3]. Wang Chang, Deng Chan, He Qi, Zhou Yifang. How Does the Use of Industrial Internet Promote the Intelligent Transformation of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: Driving Factors and Empowerment Mechanism [J]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2024, 41 (03): 103-113.

[4]. Wang Cizhi, Feng Jialin, Sun Zhongjuan, Xie Wei. The Threshold Effect of Market Turbulence on Enterprise Intelligent Transformation [J]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2023, 40 (09): 84-94.

[5]. Li Wan-Hong, Wang Fan. Digital Innovation, Strategic Flexibility and Enterprise Intelligent Transformation - Considering the Moderating Effect of Environmental Complexity [J]. Research in Science and Technology, 2023, 41 (03): 521-533.

[6]. Han Qiuming, Wang Shuhua, Yang Xuecheng, Li Jingwang. The Development Mechanism, Influencing Factors and Countermeasures of Industrial Intelligence - A Qualitative Study Based on Industry Expert Interviews [J]. China Science and Technology Forum, 2021, (08): 59-69.

[7]. Yang Zibo, Yang Lanqiao. The Dilemma and Solutions of Intelligent Transformation of Small and Medium-sized Manufacturing Enterprises in China [J]. Zhongzhou Academic Journal, 2020, (08): 25-31.

[8]. Yang Zhuofan. The Mode, Shortcomings and Countermeasures of Industrial Digital Transformation in China [J]. China's Circulation Economy, 2020, 34 (07): 60-67.