Sustainability and Corporate Governance: The Impact of ESG Policies on Business Strategy

Research Article
Open access

Sustainability and Corporate Governance: The Impact of ESG Policies on Business Strategy

Yuxin Wang 1*
  • 1 Business Administration, National University of Singapore, Singapore    
  • *corresponding author wangyuxin16@u.nus.edu
AEMPS Vol.157
ISSN (Print): 2754-1177
ISSN (Online): 2754-1169
ISBN (Print): 978-1-83558-875-8
ISBN (Online): 978-1-83558-876-5

Abstract

In recent years, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) policies have been integrated into corporate governance frameworks, critically influencing business strategy. This paper reviews the effects of ESG policies on business strategy, such as how firms have responded to the increasing demand for sustainability in their business practices. It studies the positive and negative aspects of introducing ESG policies, the part that corporate governance plays in achieving the goals of the policies, and the possible long-term aspects that may impact business performance. This paper intends to introduce how ESG policies redefined corporate strategies and motivated sustainable growth through a thorough review of existing literature and case studies. The study shows that integrating ESG policies into corporate governance and business strategy is crucial for a company. Good governance of corporations, engagement of stakeholders, and care for long-term sustainability are necessary for the success of ESG policies.

Keywords:

ESG Policies, Corporate Governance, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Risk Management

Wang,Y. (2025). Sustainability and Corporate Governance: The Impact of ESG Policies on Business Strategy. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,157,10-15.
Export citation

1. Introduction

Sustainability started as a niche concern but has become a central part of corporate strategy. Companies are pressured to adopt ESG policies, which have become the demand of investors, customers, and regulators alike. They address such issues as climate change and resource depletion, social inequality and corporate ethics. Including ESG considerations in business strategy is not just the right thing to do; it’s the right thing to do to stay competitive [1].

This paper examines the impact of ESG on business strategy, using examples of how corporate governance may help ensure the implementation of such policies. The study will analyze the pros and cons of ESG integration, how companies adjust their strategies to meet ESG objectives, and how ESG integration may affect a company’s long-term performance. This study matters to multiple stakeholders. For businesses, it offers ESG integration guidance, aiding cost - cutting and brand building. In the industry, it spurs adoption of best ESG practices. Policymakers can use its insights for evidence - based regulations, thus contributing to sustainable development.

2. The Rise of ESG Policies

2.1. Historical Context

Regarding root, the ESG policies originated from the wider drive at corporate social responsibility (CSR), which emerged midway through the last century. The first thing we know about CSR is that it was formerly about philanthropic activities and ethical business practices. It did not take long, however, before the focus was forced wider towards a more holistic approach that brought environmental, social and governance factors closer to core business processes [1].

2.2. The Modern ESG Framework

However, presently, policies such as ESG have elevated scope to tackle a broad spectrum of pertinent matters in these three dimensions. On the environmental side, these policies put forward such a proposal through initiatives relating to climate change mitigation, resource efficiency improvement, pollution reduction, and biodiversity conservation. These efforts push for sustainable practices and lower organizations' ecological footprints to as minimum as possible [2]. From a social point of view, ESG policies discuss labor standards, human rights protection, meaningful engagement in the communities where corporations operate, and diversity and inclusion in the operating environments and society. The objective of these measures is fair treatment, equity and positive social impact. On the governance front, ESG frameworks concerned with increasing board diversity, introducing more transparent and equitable executive compensation, investing in robust anti-corruption measures and protecting shareholder rights have some merit. These elements, together, constitute a complete approach to practicing good business responsibly and sustainably that coherently ties organizational goals with the goals of broader society and the planet [3].

Legislative requirements, investor demand, and consumer demand encourage companies to adopt ESG policies. For instance, the European Union (EU) Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) are new standards for ESG reporting and transparency.

3. The Impact of ESG Policies on Business Strategy

3.1. Strategic Alignment and Competitive Advantage

One of the most important impacts of ESG policies on business strategy is the requirement to align sustainability goals with core business objectives [4]. Integrating ESG considerations into company strategy is a success factor for the most significant companies. It allows companies to differentiate themselves in the market by highlighting themselves as socially conscious companies, attracting socially conscious investors, and building strong relations with customers and other stakeholders.

For example, Unilever's Sustainable Living Plan, which aims to decouple the company's growth from its environmental footprint while increasing its positive social impact, has enhanced its brand reputation and driven innovation and operational efficiency.

3.2. Risk Management

ESG policies are critical in risk management as they help the companies identify and avoid possible risks connected with environmental, social and governance problems. For example, companies proactively engaging to reduce their exposure to climate-related risks will be better positioned to deal with regulatory, physical and transition risks related to an increasingly low carbon economy.

In addition, good governance practices, such as effective anti-corruption measures and transparent reporting, can reduce the risk of legal and reputational damage. The Volkswagen emissions scandal is a prime example of a company that went against high standards of ethical governance and ran more profound risks of ESG standards that may impact the whole organization.

3.3. Financial Performance

Extensive research has been conducted on the relationship between ESG performance and financial performance. Although there are no uniform findings, the evidence grows that companies with strong ESG practices will outperform their peers in the long run. This is due to improved risk management, a better brand reputation, and higher operational efficiency [5].

For instance, a Harvard Business School study revealed that firms with strong sustainability practices perform better than their counterparts regarding stock market performance and profitability. According to MSCI, companies with high ESG ratings paid less for capital and received higher valuation multiples.

3.4. Innovation and Operational Efficiency

Companies can be motivated to innovate new products, services and business models that address sustainability challenges through ESG policies. Take the creation of renewable energy, for example. The transition to renewable energy has led to innovation within the energy sector to develop new technologies such as solar panels, wind turbines, and energy storage systems.

Additionally, ESG integration will improve operational efficiency by saving resources, reducing waste and minimizing supply chains. For instance, companies that follow circular economy practices can save costs and increase resilience by reusing materials and prolonging the life cycle of products.

4. The Role of Corporate Governance in ESG Implementation

4.1. Board Oversight and Accountability

ESG policies are effective only if supported by effective corporate governance. Boards of directors establish the tone at the top, oversee the integration of ESG considerations into the company's strategy, and hold management accountable for delivering on ESG goals.

The company’s risk management framework must also adequately address ESG risks and opportunities, and the Board must ensure that it is followed. This involves ongoing monitoring and reporting of ESG performance and engagement with key stakeholders to understand their expectations and concerns.

4.2. Executive Compensation and Incentives

Another aspect of corporate governance is aligning executive compensation with ESG performance. [6] Connecting executive pay to ESG metrics can encourage leaders to focus on sustainability and value creation in the long run instead of only on short-term financial gains.

For example, more and more progressive companies have started incorporating ESG metrics into their executives' compensation plans to ensure that executives’ objectives follow overall sustainability goals. One common approach is the introduction of "ESG-linked bonuses", where a portion of an executive's annual bonus is tied to achieving specific ESG targets. These could be framed as measurable outcomes, such as reducing the company’s carbon footprint by a percent, growing energy efficiency, or reducing net zero emissions within a timeframe.

4.3. Stakeholder Engagement

Engaging with stakeholders from a corporate perspective also means ensuring that their interests are considered in decision-making processes. This includes shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers, and the community. Stakeholder engagement can be effective for companies in identifying emerging ESG issues, enhancing trust, and securing a social license to operate.

Companies are better positioned to tackle environmental and social issues and avoid conflicts, which could interfere with business operations or tarnish their reputation, if they engage with communities affected by their business. For example, in the mining industry, companies often encounter very high environmental and social challenges. For instance, a mining company working in a remote location might engage with the tribes and communities by asking what they are most worried about: the impact of water usage, land degradation, and employment opportunities. By holding regular community meetings, conducting environmental impact assessments, and inviting the local leaders in the decision-making process, the company can develop strategies that will reduce the negative impacts, including water recycling systems, rehabilitating mined lands, and local employment programmers. In addition to preventing potential conflicts from becoming full-blown, proactive engagement helps foster a good relationship with the community, creating a part of the social license to operate and thus making way for a smoother project implementation.

Similarly, a company in the retail sector may work with its suppliers to guarantee ethical sourcing practices. For instance, a clothing retailer can cooperate with suppliers to conduct labor auditing, pay just wages, and eliminate child labor. The retailer could provide training and resources to suppliers to help improve working conditions within its supply chain, which would fulfill the retailer’s ESG goals while minimizing the likelihood of suffering from reputational damage due to labor violations. The engagement with this kind of stakeholder shows a commitment to backing the company's ethical practices and holds the potential of a stronger, more sustainable relationship with the suppliers, which will amount to the company's long-term performance and reputation.

5. Challenges and Barriers to ESG Integration

5.1. Challenges

One of the main challenges in implementing ESG policies is the lack of standardized metrics and reporting frameworks. Given the many ESG reporting standards and guidelines, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), a unified approach may result in inconsistencies, and stakeholders may find it challenging to compare ESG performance across companies.

The prevalence of short-termism in corporate decision-making challenges ESG integration. Investors and analysts pressure many companies to deliver short-term financial results, which might discourage investments in long-term sustainability programmers. To overcome this challenge, it is necessary to change the mindset and include long-term value creation as a fundamental principle of corporate strategy [7].

Introducing ESG policies may be resource-hungry for small and medium companies with scarce financial and human resources capabilities. Incorporating ESG considerations effectively into a company’s operations may require companies to invest in new technologies, training, and efforts in capacity building [8]. To compete, SMEs will often need to overcome immense challenges of access to capital and technical assistance.

5.2. Case Studies

The outdoor apparel company Patagonia is well known for its sustainability and social responsibility practices. To achieve this, the company has integrated ESG principles into its business strategy to conserve the environment, promote fair labor practices, and create a transparent supply chain. Patagonia has fully taken the initiative, whereby they use recycled materials, minimize water and power consumption, and back environmental activism. By running such programmers, the company’s brand reputation has increased and has been very fruitful to the company financially.

In the transition to sustainable transport, Tesla, the manufacturer of electric vehicles, has taken a leading role. The company’s ESG strategy is to reduce carbon emissions from their work in producing electric vehicles and renewable energy solutions. The Tesla example underpins how ESG integration can create value and drive competitive advantage. With its innovative business model, Tesla has disrupted the automotive industry and driven substantial growth; companies may miss out on opportunities if it don’t not share their successes by going green.

British Petroleum(BP), a multinational oil and gas company, has faced significant challenges in aligning its business strategy with ESG principles. While the company has committed to reducing carbon emissions and transitioning to renewable energy, its efforts have been criticized as insufficient and inconsistent. BP's case highlights the complexities and challenges of ESG integration in industries with high environmental impacts [9].

6. Conclusion

Integrated ESG policies into corporate governance and business strategy are crucial for a company to exist in the 21st century and are now necessary. Today, ESG considerations are transforming business operations, encouraging innovation, improving risk management and creating long-term value. However, good governance of corporations, engagement of stakeholders, and care for long-term sustainability are necessary for the success of ESG policies.

Through the changing business landscape, embracing ESG principles and directing company strategies towards sustainability goals will put companies in a better position to take advantage of the obstacles and opportunities that await the future. Patagonia, Tesla, and BP’s case studies demonstrate the benefits and challenges of ESG integration as applied to companies in different sectors and are valuable lessons for companies in all industries.

Finally, ESG policies have truly changed the way business strategies are formed. As a result, companies can become more successful by improving sustainability and responsible governance while helping to create a more sustainable and equitable world.

Moreover, the study may not fully account for unforeseen external shocks, such as economic recessions or sudden regulatory changes, which can significantly alter the ESG - business strategy landscape.


References

[1]. Shrivastava, P., & Addas, A. (2014). The impact of corporate governance on sustainability performance. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 4(1), 21-37.

[2]. Annesi, N., Battaglia, M., Ceglia, I., & Mercuri, F. (2024). Navigating paradoxes: building a sustainable strategy for an integrated ESG corporate governance. Management Decision.

[3]. Kocmanová, A., Hřebíček, J., & Dočekalová, M. (2011). CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABILITY. Economics & Management, 16.

[4]. Chandrakant, R., & Rajesh, R. (2023). Social sustainability, corporate governance, and sustainability performances: an empirical study of the effects. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(7), 9131-9143.

[5]. Weston, P., & Nnadi, M. (2023). Evaluation of strategic and financial variables of corporate sustainability and ESG policies on corporate finance performance. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(2), 1058-1074.

[6]. Patil, R. A., Ghisellini, P., & Ramakrishna, S. (2021). Towards sustainable business strategies for a circular economy: environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and evaluation. An introduction to circular economy, 527-554.

[7]. Singh, R., & Tarkar, P. (2024). An empirical analysis on sustainable start-up: Embedding Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) into high growth business strategy. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(3), 1810-1810.

[8]. Kuznetsova, S. N., Kuznetsov, V. P., Smirnova, Z. V., Andryashina, N. S., & Romanovskaya, E. V. (2024). Corporate Governance in the ESG Context: A New Understanding of Sustainability. In Ecological Footprint of the Modern Economy and the Ways to Reduce It: The Role of Leading Technologies and Responsible Innovations (pp. 53-57). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

[9]. Grove, H., & Clouse, M. (2018). Focusing on sustainability to strengthen corporate governance. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 2(2), 38-47.


Cite this article

Wang,Y. (2025). Sustainability and Corporate Governance: The Impact of ESG Policies on Business Strategy. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,157,10-15.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of ICMRED 2025 Symposium: Earnings Manipulation by Zombie Firms

ISBN:978-1-83558-875-8(Print) / 978-1-83558-876-5(Online)
Editor:Lukáš Vartiak, Naser Makarem
Conference date: 18 April 2025
Series: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Volume number: Vol.157
ISSN:2754-1169(Print) / 2754-1177(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Shrivastava, P., & Addas, A. (2014). The impact of corporate governance on sustainability performance. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 4(1), 21-37.

[2]. Annesi, N., Battaglia, M., Ceglia, I., & Mercuri, F. (2024). Navigating paradoxes: building a sustainable strategy for an integrated ESG corporate governance. Management Decision.

[3]. Kocmanová, A., Hřebíček, J., & Dočekalová, M. (2011). CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABILITY. Economics & Management, 16.

[4]. Chandrakant, R., & Rajesh, R. (2023). Social sustainability, corporate governance, and sustainability performances: an empirical study of the effects. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(7), 9131-9143.

[5]. Weston, P., & Nnadi, M. (2023). Evaluation of strategic and financial variables of corporate sustainability and ESG policies on corporate finance performance. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(2), 1058-1074.

[6]. Patil, R. A., Ghisellini, P., & Ramakrishna, S. (2021). Towards sustainable business strategies for a circular economy: environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and evaluation. An introduction to circular economy, 527-554.

[7]. Singh, R., & Tarkar, P. (2024). An empirical analysis on sustainable start-up: Embedding Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) into high growth business strategy. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(3), 1810-1810.

[8]. Kuznetsova, S. N., Kuznetsov, V. P., Smirnova, Z. V., Andryashina, N. S., & Romanovskaya, E. V. (2024). Corporate Governance in the ESG Context: A New Understanding of Sustainability. In Ecological Footprint of the Modern Economy and the Ways to Reduce It: The Role of Leading Technologies and Responsible Innovations (pp. 53-57). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

[9]. Grove, H., & Clouse, M. (2018). Focusing on sustainability to strengthen corporate governance. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 2(2), 38-47.