1. Introduction
Subscription, a concept originated in the 17th century UK, where individuals known as subscribers would offer authors financial backing in different quantities to assist in the printing of publication books. The subscription model has been widespread in several industries, with the publishing business being particularly notable in the 20th century. As time passes, the characteristics of subscription, allowing regular fixed payments in exchange for continuous access to online services and products, will enable it to become the most popular payment method for online services and products, which has represented an estimated 2.7% of consumers' total wallets [1]. Major industry giants in many regions, such as Sony, Patreon, Microsoft, and YouTube, utilize subscriptions as their main business model. In the financial year 2023, Sony's PlayStation Plus, a monthly subscription service, accounted for 12.87% of its total income from game and network services sector sales [2]. Platforms that offer subscription services typically improve the quality of their services and give additional features that are only available to paid customers as a benefit. Netflix, as one of the leading platforms, depends on premium subscribers who stream video to earn income.
Meanwhile, several platforms boost their income and user subscriptions by including advertisement. Specifically, non-subscribed users are required to view the ad during enjoying the free services provided by platform, while subscribed users can avoid those disturbing commercials. YouTube would be one of the representatives among these platforms. This delineation results in a notable disparity between the experience of subscribed and unsubscribed users. As an increasing number of companies such as Amazon, Apple, Disney, and others introduce their subscription platforms, subscription had already become a common payment method on digital goods and services. Leader companies are providing two different subscribing models toward consumer and seems that there is not a common choice on which model is better by the point of views from companies. As subscribing usually produce long term return, we would like to determine which methods are most effective in retaining consumers.
Moreover, some scholar claims that subscription allows customers to become greatly attached to using the service and, therefore, more likely to extend by signing an agreement for the next period close to when the current deal expires [3-4]. As time passes, technology and business were evolving. To earn more revenue, companies had developed different ways to attract potential customers. Unfortunately, past papers have not made research on the real merchandise of subscribing, for example. We were curious on what really attract consumer click on that subscribing button season by season.
This paper explores the consumption preferences of subscribers. And through a questionnaire survey, analyze the changes in subscribers' choices in the next subscription cycle after providing two subscribing models to respondents. A simplified version with fewer service and an advertised version with advertisement to subscribers, in order to explore the influencing factors of subscriber churn rate, and further explore consumers' loss aversion.
The study is organized as follows: Section 2 reviews the literature, summarizing major survey databases, and the relationship between subscription and consumer behavior. Section 3 outlines the key variables, data sources, and regression model. Section 4 presents an empirical analysis of the relationship between subscription churn rates and external factors. Section 5 offers the conclusion of the whole paper.
2. Literature review
Clapp [5] first introduced the concept of subscription as a method through which subscribers offered authors varying amounts of upfront financial support to facilitate the publication of books. Cachon and Feldman [6] claim that subscriptions would be more effective at earning revenue and show that the absolute advantage of subscription pricing relative to per-use pricing can be more substantial than per-use pricing.
Chen [7] studies the benchmark case with no free trial for each scenario derives equilibrium results with free trial promotion and provides useful managerial insights for online content platforms when considering their subscription strategies. Thøgersen [8] executed a field experiment in which participants were offered a complimentary one-month trial. The trial led to an increase in the user number of the services being examined. Although the impact waned after the expiration of the promotional offer, its persistence was observable even five months later.
The focus of this research experiment is to explore the effects of altering the content of a subscription service and introducing a free-use model after the subscription cycle ends. Specifically, the study aims to understand the impact of these changes on subscription numbers and user retention among individuals who have previously used the services. In the experiment, participants were required to fill in a questionnaire. After finishing questions on basic information, participants had to go through two scenario questions, so that we could observe the actual responds of participants while facing realistic selection. Assuming the respondent had already started their subscription service before the experiment start, and they are going to face the situation that the services owner started providing a free model to its user. By comparing the differences of churn rate in these scenes, we could have a brief estimation of consumer choices.
In this paper, we study the influencing factors of subscriber consumption preferences and subscriber churn rate. We collected personal characteristic data, electronic product usage characteristic data, and 440 valid questionnaire data from the WJX.cn platform by sending and collecting questionnaires. We conducted quantitative analysis on the personal characteristics, electronic product usage characteristics, and responses to subscription questions made by the respondents in our designed experiment.
3. Methodology
3.1. Sample size
The sample was collected from the Chinese survey platform, WJX.cn. We posted the survey on 19th July 2024. It is a weekend in the middle of the month with no surrounding public holidays, which helped us avoid potential influence and collect more data. Moreover, that would effectively reduce the external impact on our participants from most of the monthly subscription services, since they were charging their fee around the beginning or end of the month. The survey was written in English to ensure that ambiguity will not be caused while translating. We have spread the survey through the internet. Finally, 450 questionnaires were collected until the paper was written on 21st July 2024. Most of the survey was filled by the students of Jinan University and Chinese internet users. While the questionnaire was being posted, we set a minimum valid answer time to 10 seconds to ensure that the respondents read and completed the questionnaire carefully. Until the collection was stopped, a total of 450 questionnaires were being collected and 440 of them were valid, with an effective rate of 97%.
3.2. Survey
Our survey aims to investigate whether or not users continue their subscriptions in different situations. We simplified the problem with two multiple-choices questions instead of using a field test, so that more data can be collected in less time, and the sample size is representative enough. In this survey, the main question is about the consumer choices in situation of reducing advertisement or gaining more services. And there are some questions involving in personal habits and characteristics, which helped us better develop mathematical model to gain further conclusion.
Before respondents were questioned, they would be informed that the questionnaire was anonymous and their information was confidential, it would only be used for research purposes so that we could receive informative data. As written in the section 3.1 Sample size, the questionnaire was proposed in China, while the survey was written in English instead of Chinese to avoid translation problems. And it contained 10 questions with some of them mentioning complicated situation questions, the completion time is expected to be about 2 minutes. Predicting the using time helps us set a filter. Secondly, we will obtain their characteristic data through the following four multiple-choice questions which are about age, gender, education, and monthly disposable income. Then collect data on the characteristics of respondents' electronic product usage through three multiple-choice questions which are about the daily using electronics time, the services used, the average amount spent on monthly subscriptions, we have set 100 Yuan as the highest spending on subscription monthly, as Chinese citizens expend 100 yuan on educational, cultural and entertainment in 2022 [9]. And one scale question which is about familiarity with the subscription system by scoring according to degree 1-10, where 1 means no familiarity at all; and 10 means the most familiar. The full questionnaire can be found in appendix.
3.3. Procedure
Before the experimental section begins, we inform the respondents that this experiment is simulating the real purchase scenario so that we can better simulate accurate consumer choices in their daily life after carefully considering the different features and details of each option. Their choice helps us understand the decision-making process when facing different product features. The experimental part is being divided as two questions. The first one assumes that they use a paid subscription service for video software in the first month. One month later, the video platform launched a free usage mode: they can use the software for free but need to watch a 15-second advertisement before watching the video and cannot skip it. Or they can still choose the subscription model of 10 yuan per month. In subscription mode, they don't need to watch ads before the video starts. Respondents imagine actions they are taking while there will be a free model. Three options were given in the questionnaire: stop using the software with such changes, continue to use the software and keep subscripting the services of removing advertisement or switch to use the free software with advertisement. The second question which is independent of the first question. Respondents are assuming that they use a paid subscription service for video software in the first month. One month later, the video platform launched a free usage mode: they can use the software for free, but they cannot enjoy higher clarity, early access privileges, and identity privileges. They can still choose the subscription model of 10 yuan per month to continue to have these services. Respondents imagine actions they are taking while there will be a free model. Three options were given in the questionnaire: stop using the software with such changes, continue to use the software and keep subscripting to enjoy more services or switch to use the free software with worser services comparing to subscription version. The subscription churn rate is equal to the sum of the number of respondents who choose the free mode and stop using the service option in these two experiments divided by the total number of respondents.
3.4. Variables
Descriptive feature statistics were conducted on the personal attribute characteristics and electronic product and subscription data of the sample, as shown in Table 1. From Table 1, it can be seen that females account for 51.82% and males account for 41.09%. The distribution of males and females is relatively even, with slightly more females than males. The majority of the surveyed population is aged 20-30, accounting for 47.05%. 61.14% of the respondents have a college degree or above.
As each participate respectively answers the question for control group and question for treatment group, we therefore use the sample twice and then generate a dummy variable Advertisement to identify the effect of treatment in the regression model.
Observations |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
|
Characteristics |
|||
Age |
|||
<10 |
13 |
0.030 |
0.170 |
10-20 |
121 |
0.275 |
0.447 |
20-30 |
207 |
0.470 |
0.500 |
>30 |
99 |
0.225 |
0.418 |
Gender (Male=1) |
440 |
0.482 |
0.500 |
Education (College or above) |
440 |
0.611 |
0.488 |
Monthly disposable income (Yuan) |
|||
<1000 |
29 |
0.066 |
0.248 |
1000-3000 |
109 |
0.248 |
0.432 |
3000-5000 |
128 |
0.291 |
0.455 |
5000-10000 |
126 |
0.286 |
0.453 |
>10000 |
48 |
0.109 |
0.312 |
Habits |
|||
Daily using electronics time (Hour) |
|||
<1 |
24 |
0.055 |
0.227 |
1-3 |
143 |
0.325 |
0.469 |
3-5 |
169 |
0.384 |
0.487 |
5-7 |
70 |
0.159 |
0.366 |
>7 |
34 |
0.077 |
0.267 |
The services have used (multiple options) |
|||
Short video / video platform |
159 |
0.361 |
0.481 |
Streaming platform |
135 |
0.307 |
0.462 |
Over-the-top media services |
111 |
0.252 |
0.435 |
Video games |
153 |
0.348 |
0.477 |
News service |
135 |
0.307 |
0.462 |
Office-software |
160 |
0.364 |
0.482 |
Crowdfunding platform |
145 |
0.330 |
0.471 |
Familiarity with subscription systems (1-10) |
440 |
7.393 |
1.549 |
Average amount spends on monthly subscriptions (Yuan) |
|||
0 |
18 |
0.041 |
0.198 |
0-50 |
212 |
0.482 |
0.500 |
50-100 |
178 |
0.405 |
0.491 |
>100 |
32 |
0.073 |
0.260 |
Outcome with advertisement |
400 |
0.91 |
0.29 |
Outcome with services |
376 |
0.85 |
0.35 |
3.5. Model specification
Considering that the explained variable loss rate of subscription is ordered scattered data, the ordered Probit model is used in the estimation method [10]. In order to study the impact and mechanism of subscription methods on Loss rate of subscription, the following verification model is set up:
Where LRS represents the loss rate of subscription of the object under investigation;
4. Results analysis
Table 2 shows the main results of the analysis. While control group was introduced with a free using method with fewer services, the treatment group was introduced with a free using method with advertisement. As shown in column (1), with treatment applied and neither the characteristics nor habits of respondents were controlled, the treatment leads to a reduction in the share of individuals who do not subscribe by 27.9 percentage points at 5 percent significant level. This result is robust to adding individual controls in column (2), the effect of treatment remains significantly negatively related to loss rate of usage. And the same situation also happens while adding indicators of habits (column 3), the reduction in loss rate of usage increase to 29.9 percentage points at 1 percent significant level. Reassuringly, the main effect continues to hold (and slightly increases). The reduction of loss rate of usage is 30.5 percentage points at 1 percent significant level when controlling for both sets of variables (column 4).
Comparing to the control group, these negative coefficient shows that, introducing advertisement as the main merchandise could better attract consumers remain using the services. Controlling the personal characteristics in this model, the effect of advertisement on loss rate of subscription is slightly higher than without controlling, may be attributed to the substantial influence of personal characteristics and habits on the relationship between advertisement and loss rate of subscription.
Dependent variable: Loss rate of subscription |
||||
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
|
Advertisement |
-0.279** |
-0.288** |
-0.299*** |
-0.305*** |
(0.111) |
(0.114) |
(0.116) |
(0.118) |
|
Characteristics |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Habits |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
N |
880 |
880 |
880 |
880 |
Notes: All columns are estimated using Probit regression model. *** for p < 0.01, ** for p < 0.05, and* for p < 0.1. A full table with estimated coefficients for all controls can be found in Appendix Table.
5. Conclusion and discussion
As existing literature had already analyzed the behavioral intention of online subscribers, but they did not focus on the effect advertainment on merchandise too much. This paper presents evidence on the question whether consumers perform differently while facing different bonus associated with subscribing button. The comparison on consumer behavior is important for any company that is going to propose their own subscribing product or services, as the data basically fit the realistic market environment.
YouTube Premium and Spotify, which are the most popular over-the-top media service subscription services, have proven that even by simply removing advertisements, they can still attract lots of customers. The platform can generate revenue through subscription fees as well as by monetizing advertisements. As it appears as usual as it can, people may get adaptive bias on watching advertisement. The acceptances could grow much higher than it was. Comparing a suitable advertisement may help company gaining more revenue.
In this paper, we used 440 valid responds obtained from the WJX.cn platform to quantitatively analyze the factors affecting subscriber consumption preferences and subscriber churn rate through responses to subscription questions via using probit regression analysis method. The personal characteristics of respondents and electronic product usage characteristics would be the control variable of the experiment using probit regression analysis method. By introducing a usage model that offers free but requires ad. viewing to subscribers, the churn rate of subscribers can be reduced by 30.5% with controlling habits and characteristics.
For the potential reason of why advertisement can better attract consumer while more services do not perform well, loss aversion could be the main reason behind this abnormal consumer behavior. Loss aversion is to be ubiquitous, applying to many types of goods and risks [11]. It should be noted that there are limits to loss aversion. We suggest that companies which is willing to introduce subscription system should set advertisement with an appropriate amount. Based on the theory, advertisement could be seen as a kind of well-being loss that users used to take the free-ad version. Then to maintain the original well-being, users may choose a subscription model to remove advertisements.
However, as subjective bias may happen while respondents answering questionnaires. To avoid possible deviation, we only set up a simple test on the consumer behavior. And participants would only answer the questions that could be simplified as dummy variables in regression analysis, which could only show the choice of consumers. To better illustrate the difference, further study can be focused on establishing a model of the accurate influence of advertising through field experiment.
In this paper, data was mostly collected by survey. To observe how consumer behave, we have created complicated situation in the form of questions. This experiment could not reflect the realistic performance of churn rate with time changes. We suggest further field experiment can be made to gain more accurate data.
Acknowledgement
ChakWa Cheung and Xinyang Ma contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.
We would like to express our deep gratitude to Professor Andrea Bernini and every Teacher Assistants, our research supervisors, for their patient guidance, enthusiastic encouragement and useful critiques of this research work.
References
[1]. Pieters, L., Lobaugh, K., Waelter, A., & Rogers, S. (2023, November 20). An evolving world of digital goods and services. Deloitte Insights. https: //www2.deloitte.com/xe/en/insights/industry/retail-distribution/consumer-behavior-trends-state-of-the-consumer-tracker/consumer-digital-spending-trends.html.
[2]. Sony Group Corporation. (2024). Supplemental Financial Data.
[3]. Chen, Y., & Keng, C. (2023). The effect of subscription relational bond on customer engagement and stickiness in podcast: the moderating role of social connectedness. Service Business, 17(3), 723–745.
[4]. McCormick, M. (2016, March 9). The power of subscription pricing. https: //blog.blackcurve.com/the-power-of-subscription-pricing.
[5]. Clapp, S. L. C. (1931). The beginnings of subscription publication in the seventeenth century. Modern Philology, 29(2), 199–224.
[6]. Cachon, G. P., & Feldman, P. (2011). Pricing services subject to congestion: Charge Per-Use fees or sell subscriptions? Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 13(2), 244–260.
[7]. Chen, L. (2023). Analysis of online platforms’ free trial strategies for digital content subscription. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 18(4), 2107–2124.
[8]. Thøgersen, J. (2009). Promoting public transport as a subscription service: Effects of a free month travel card. Transport Policy, 16(6), 335–343.
[9]. National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2022). CHINA STATISTICAL YEARBOOK. 7503799501, 9787503799501
[10]. Muthén, B. (1979). A Structural Probit Model with Latent Variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(368), 807–811.
[11]. Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 119–128.
Cite this article
Cheung,C.W.;Ma,X. (2025). Advertisement or Services? The Choice of Customers’ Subscription. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,202,105-113.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Financial Technology and Business Analysis
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Pieters, L., Lobaugh, K., Waelter, A., & Rogers, S. (2023, November 20). An evolving world of digital goods and services. Deloitte Insights. https: //www2.deloitte.com/xe/en/insights/industry/retail-distribution/consumer-behavior-trends-state-of-the-consumer-tracker/consumer-digital-spending-trends.html.
[2]. Sony Group Corporation. (2024). Supplemental Financial Data.
[3]. Chen, Y., & Keng, C. (2023). The effect of subscription relational bond on customer engagement and stickiness in podcast: the moderating role of social connectedness. Service Business, 17(3), 723–745.
[4]. McCormick, M. (2016, March 9). The power of subscription pricing. https: //blog.blackcurve.com/the-power-of-subscription-pricing.
[5]. Clapp, S. L. C. (1931). The beginnings of subscription publication in the seventeenth century. Modern Philology, 29(2), 199–224.
[6]. Cachon, G. P., & Feldman, P. (2011). Pricing services subject to congestion: Charge Per-Use fees or sell subscriptions? Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 13(2), 244–260.
[7]. Chen, L. (2023). Analysis of online platforms’ free trial strategies for digital content subscription. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 18(4), 2107–2124.
[8]. Thøgersen, J. (2009). Promoting public transport as a subscription service: Effects of a free month travel card. Transport Policy, 16(6), 335–343.
[9]. National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2022). CHINA STATISTICAL YEARBOOK. 7503799501, 9787503799501
[10]. Muthén, B. (1979). A Structural Probit Model with Latent Variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(368), 807–811.
[11]. Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 119–128.