Download pdf
Applications of the Anchoring Effect in Online Shopping Festivals
- 1 King’s College London
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Nowadays, online shopping festivals are prevalent and effective at boosting e-commerce. Research focused on online consumer behaviours did not consider anchoring, a heuristic consumers use, during the decision-making process of purchasing, whereas studies of the anchoring effect failed to shed light on online shopping. This paper aims to explain the psychology behind five major strategies used by online retailers to explore the applications of the anchoring effect on online shopping festivals, which are ideal for examining online consumer behaviours involving impulse buying. It was found that sellers can exploit the anchoring effect by discounts, brand images, quantity anchors, bundles, and coupons to attract consumers to buy their products during online shopping festivals. Consumers, noticing the anchors offered by sellers, such as previous prices of items on sale, adjust insufficiently from them, resulting in biased estimations of the true value of products. Finally, suggestions for consumers, online shopping platforms, and the government to mitigate the anchoring effect are given. This paper provides guidance on both using and mitigating the anchoring effect for sellers and consumers online.
Keywords
anchoring effect, e-commerce, online shopping festivals
[1]. Monthly Retail Trade, https://www.census.gov, last accessed 2022/08/31.
[2]. Kohli, R., Devaraj, S., Mahmood, M. A.: Understanding Determinants of Online Consumer Satisfaction: A Decision Process Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 21(1), 115-136 (2004).
[3]. Chan, G., Cheung, C., Kwong, T., Limayem, M., Zhu, L.: Online Consumer Behavior: A Review and Agenda for Future Research. In: BLED 2003 Proceedings, 43. Bled, Slovenia (2003).
[4]. Darley, W. K., Blankson, C., Luethge, D. J.: Toward an integrated framework for online consumer behavior and decision making process: A review. Psychology & Marketing 27(2), 94-116 (2010).
[5]. Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D.: “Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1), 73-106 (2003).
[6]. Lee, L., Ariely, D.: Shopping Goals, Goal Concreteness, and Conditional Promotions. Journal of Consumer Research 33(1), 60-70 (2006).
[7]. Wansink, B., Kent, R. J., Hoch, S. J.: An Anchoring and Adjustment Model of Purchase Quantity Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research 35(1), 71-81 (1998).
[8]. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science 185(4157), 1124-1131 (1974).
[9]. Wilson, T. D., Houston, C. E., Etling, K. M., Brekke, N.: A New Look at Anchoring Effects: Basic Anchoring and Its Antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125(4), 387-402 (1996).
[10]. Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. 1st edn. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York (2011).
[11]. Mussweiler, T., Strack, F.: Comparing Is Believing: A Selective Accessibility Model of Judgmental Anchoring. European Review of Social Psychology 10(1), 135-167 (1999).
[12]. Epley, N., Gilovich, T.: The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic: Why the Adjustments Are Insufficient. Psychological Science 17(4), 311-318 (2006).
[13]. Northcraft, G. B., Neale, M. A.: Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 39(1), 84-97 (1987).
[14]. Akram, U., Hui, P., Khan, M. K., Hashim, M., Qiu, Y., Zhang, Y.: Online Impulse Buying on “Double Eleven” Shopping Festival: An Empirical Investigation of Utilitarian and Hedonic Motivations. In: International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management, pp. 680-692. Springer, Cham (2017).
[15]. Double 11 sales maintain momentum, as industry overhaul shows effect, https://www.globaltimes.cn, last accessed 2022/09/08.
[16]. Cyber Monday online sales drop 1.4% from last year to $10.7 billion, falling for the first time ever, https://www.cnbc.com, last accessed 2022/09/08.
[17]. Burton, S., Lichtenstein, D. R., Herr, P. M.: An Examination of the Effects of Information Consistency and Distinctiveness in a Reference‐Price Advertisement Context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 23(24), 2074-2092 (1993).
[18]. Chapman, G. B., Johnson, E. J.: The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7(4), 223-242 (1994).
[19]. Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., Pfeiffer, T.: Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect: Considering the Opposite Compensates for Selective Accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26(9), 1142-1150 (2000).
[20]. Dawar, N., Parker, P.: Marketing Universals: Consumers’ Use of Brand Name, Price, Physical Appearance, and Retailer Reputation as Signals of Product Quality. Journal of Marketing 58(2), 81-95 (1994).
[21]. Lee, K. S., Tan, S. J.: E-retailing versus physical retailing: A theoretical model and empirical test of consumer choice. Journal of Business Research 56(11), 877-885 (2003).
[22]. Yadav, M. S.: How Buyers Evaluate Product Bundles: A Model of Anchoring and Adjustment. Journal of Consumer Research 21(2), 342-353 (1994).
[23]. Agarwal, M. K., Chatterjee, S.: Complexity, uniqueness, and similarity in between‐bundle choice. Journal of Product & Brand Management 12(6), 358-376 (2003).
[24]. Oliver, R.L., Shor, M.: Digital redemption of coupons: satisfying and dissatisfying effects of promotion codes. Journal of Product & Brand Management 12(2), 121-134 (2003).
[25]. Wu, C. S., Cheng, F. F.: The joint effect of framing and anchoring on internet buyers’ decision-making. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 10(3), 358-368 (2011).
Cite this article
Zuo,X. (2023). Applications of the Anchoring Effect in Online Shopping Festivals. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,12,261-268.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Business and Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).