
The Importance of ESG in Corporate Strategy and Investment Decisions with Patagonia as an Example
- 1 University of York
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Companies and investors are increasingly relying on environmental, social and governance factors to address long-term sustainability and ethical implications, and ESG is a non-financial criterion for assessing these factors, mainly applied to assess the current status of corporate social responsibility, environmental governance and other aspects. This paper uses the various methods of ESG assessment and provides a brief introduction before using Patagonia, an American outdoor clothing and equipment company, as a study of environmental and social responsibility, where several measures are taken to reduce corporate governance and ensure social justice. The final in-depth study found that it is particularly important for companies to prioritize ESG. Firstly, ESG increases the level of engagement with stakeholders, enhances the reputation of the company's brand and ultimately leads to improved financial performance, and with climate change and social inequality practices occurring regularly, it is now imperative that companies seize the opportunity to create a more sustainable society.
Keywords
ESG, stakeholder, patagonia, GRI, SASB
[1]. Clarkson, M. B. E., Freeman, R. E., & Kaptein, M. Doing the right thing: A conceptual framework for understanding corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(4), 687–701 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2610-2
[2]. United Nations Environment Programme. Emissions gap report 2020. United Nations Environment Programme (2020). https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/34500/EGR2020.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
[3]. Crane, A., & Matten, D. Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization (4th ed.). Oxford University Press (2016).
[4]. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. G20/OECD principles of corporate governance (2015). . https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/corporategovernanceprinciples/39232230.pdf
[5]. Clarkson, M. B. E., Fang, X., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. D. The relevance of environmental, social, and governance factors to firm value: A literature review. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38(1), 1–14 (2019).
[6]. Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment, 29(2), 156–174 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615598478
[7]. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931 (2011).
[8]. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2307/41166284
[9]. Impact of ESG on stakeholders, including investors, employees, customers, and communities Whelan, T. The ESG Guidebook: Your Guide to Sustainable Investing. Wiley (2020).
[10]. Overview of different ESG criteria and standards, such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals, GRI Standards, and SASB standards United Nations Development Programme. Sustainable Development Goals (2015). https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html
[11]. Global Reporting Initiative. GRI Standards (2016). https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/
[12]. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. SASB Standards (2021). https://www.sasb.org/standards/
[13]. Morgan Stanley. Institute for Sustainable Investing (2021). https://www.morganstanley.com/what-we-do/institute-for-sustainable-investing
[14]. Bloomberg LP. Bloomberg ESG Data (2021). https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/solution/esg-data/
[15]. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 100-107 (2017).
[16]. Definition and overview of ESG investing MSCI. ESG Investing (2021). https://www.msci.com/esg-investing
[17]. Global Impact Investing Network. What is Impact Investing? (2021). https://thegiin.org/impact-investing/
[18]. US SIF Foundation. Report on US Sustainable, Responsible and Impact Investing Trends (2020). https://www.ussif.org/files/2020%20Trends%20Report%20Executive%20Summary.pdf
[19]. Brennan, T., & Lo, A. W. Climbing Mount ESG: Measuring the Performance of ESG Portfolios. Journal of Portfolio Management, 47(1), 10-27 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2020.47.1.010
[20]. Patagonia. The Footprint Chronicles®: Patagonia's Life Cycle Assessment Website (2023). https://www.patagonia.com/footprint.html
[21]. Vos, A.C. & Van der Byl, C. Patagonia's Sustainability Stewardship: A Call for Responsible Leadership in Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 309 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1959-7.
[22]. Eccles, R.G., Ioannou, I. & Serafeim, G. The Business Case for Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Management: The Example of Patagonia. Harvard Business School Working Paper, 17(023) (2016).
[23]. Lebowitz, S. Patagonia’s Sustainability Strategy: Don’t Buy Our Products. Harvard Business Review (2021). https://hbr.org/2021/05/patagonias-sustainability-strategy-dont-buy-our-products
Cite this article
Tong,H. (2023). The Importance of ESG in Corporate Strategy and Investment Decisions with Patagonia as an Example. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,25,88-94.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Management Research and Economic Development
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).