Download pdf
Analysis and Synthesis of the Environmental Progress of Apple Inc. from 2008 to 2022
- 1 Shandong University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Apple Inc. has been committed to environmental sustainability since its beginnings and has made considerable strides toward those objectives throughout the years. The company has been aiming to reduce the total amount of greenhouse gases (GHG) released throughout the production, transportation, and disposal of all of their products since 2006. Up to 95% of all emissions come from the electronic industry, including its production, distribution, use, and disposal. Greenhouse gas emissions from Apple's operations are just 5% of the company's total, in contrast to the 100% from its products. Apple Inc. claims it would be vigilant in tracking how its operations affect the planet. In order to ensure that all of its locations are up to par with regulations and industry norms, it has created an EHS management system. This paper details the environmental effect of Apple's facilities, including Apple Retail Stores, describes the measures being taken to lessen the company's impact on the environment, and sums up Apple's most noteworthy environmental accomplishments from 2008 to 2022. The GRI Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (G3) were considered over the course of this research.
Keywords
electronic industry, Apple Inc., environmental progress, greenhouse gas emissions
[1]. Apple Propels Environmental Business Solutions Forward with Second Impact Accelerator Class - Apple.” Apple Newsroom, 25 Aug. 2022, www.apple.com/newsroom/2022/08/apple-propels-environmental-business-solutions-forward-with-second-impact-accelerator-class.
[2]. “Apple Helps Suppliers Rapidly Accelerate Renewable Energy Use around the World - Apple.” Apple Newsroom, 14 Apr. 2022, www.apple.com/newsroom/2022/04/apple-helps-suppliers-rapidly-accelerate-renewable-energy-use-around-the-world.
[3]. The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (G3): www.globalreporting.org/ReportingFramework/G3Online.
[4]. More information on Austin green energy: www.austinenergy.com/index.htm.
[5]. “Supplier Responsibility - Apple.” Apple, www.apple.com/supplier-responsibility. Accessed 26 Sept.2022.
[6]. Carbon emissions equivalences calculated using U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2019 data: www.eia.gov/electricity/sales_revenue_price/pdf/ table5_a.pdf.
[7]. “Apple Reports Third Quarter Results - Apple.” Apple Newsroom, 28 July 2015, www.apple.com/newsroom/2015/07/apple-reports-third-quarter-results.
[8]. Faludi, J., T. Hoang, P. Gorman, and M. Mulvihill, “Aiding alternatives assessment with an uncertainty-tolerant hazard scoring method”, Journal of Environmental Management, 182, 111–125, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.028
[9]. A Protocol for Prioritizing Chemicals of Concern in the Electronics Industry , 2018 https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Prioritizing_Chemicals_2018.pdf
[10]. CO2e Emissions per Product (kg), 2016, https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Environmental_Responsibility_Report_2016.pdf
[11]. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (6th Revised Edition), New York and Geneva, (2015). http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev06/06files_e.htm
[12]. Clean Production Action, GreenScreen® for Safer Chemicals Hazard Assessment Criteria. Version 1.3, 2017. http://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/
[13]. Sustainable Fiber Specification, Version C, https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Sustainable_Fiber_Specification_April2016.pdf
[14]. Environmental Responsibility Report, 2019 Progress Report, covering fiscal year 2018, https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Environmental_Responsibility_Report_2019.pdf
[15]. Apple’s Paper and Packaging Strategy, October 2017, https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Packaging_and_Forestry_September_2017.pdf
[16]. National Research Council (US), A framework to guide selection of chemical alternatives, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2014. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/18872/a-framework-to-guide-selection-of-chemical-alternatives
[17]. Liam - An Innovation Story, Charissa Rujanavech, Joe Lessard, Sarah Chandler, Sean Shannon, Jeffrey Dahmus, Rob Guzzo, September 2016, https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Liam_white_paper_Sept2016.pdf
[18]. Mitchell, J., N. Pabon, Z.A. Collier, P.P. Egeghy, E. Cohen-Hubal, et al., “A decision analytic approach to exposure-based chemical prioritization”, PLoS ONE, 8(8): e70911, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070911
Cite this article
Chen,Z. (2023). Analysis and Synthesis of the Environmental Progress of Apple Inc. from 2008 to 2022. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,27,97-103.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Economic Management and Green Development
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).