References
[1]. G. Behrman, The most noble adventure: the Marshall Plan and how America helped rebuild Europe, Free Press, 2008.
[2]. D. F. Vacts, Host country faces the multinational enterprise, Boston University Law Review, vol. 53, no. 2, 1973, pp. 261-277.
[3]. H. V. Perlmutter, Perplexing Routes to M.N.E Legitimacy: Codes of Conduct for Technology Transfer, Stanford Journal of International Studies, vol. 11, 1976, pp. 169-199.
[4]. C. Wang, Employment Research in the Process of Economic Globalization, Economic Science Press, 2007.
[5]. Z. Kong, The key to developing export trade lies in the continuous upgrading of products, International Business Research, vol. 1, no. 2, 1986, pp. 18-19.
[6]. E. Mitchell, Reciprocal convergences: how china might influence western corporate governance, Business & Finance Law Review, vol. 2, no. 1, 2018, pp. 77-139.
[7]. J. J. Norton, Multinational companies: of institutional 'spheres of influence', corporate social responsibility and meaningful financial sector law reform for developing countries, European Business Law Review, vol. 20, no. 1, 2009, pp. 1-62.
[8]. R. Clara, S. Christoph, Human Rights and International Investment Arbitration, Oxford University Press, 2009. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199578184.003.0004
[9]. Y. Levashova, The Accountability and Corporate Social Responsibility of Multinational Corporations for Transgressions in Host States through International Investment Law, Utrecht Law Review, vol. 14, no. 2, 2018, pp. 40-55. DOI: 10.18352/ulr.441
[10]. C. F. Salans, The 1985 rules of the London court of international arbitration, Arbitration International, vol. 2, no. 1, 1986, pp. 40-56.
[11]. X. Shi, The Relativity of the Finality of the First Arbitration in International Commercial Arbitration, Journal of Chang'an University: Social Science Edition, vol. 11(4), no. 7, 2009. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6248.2009.04.012
[12]. C. A. Rogers, The politics of international investment arbitrators, Santa Clara Journal of International Law, vol. 12, no. 1, 2013, pp. 223-262.
[13]. Z. Zhou, The Advantages of Commercial Arbitration over Litigation, Its Development Trend and Suggestions, Legal System and Economics, vol. 6, 2020, pp. 62-63.
[14]. United nations commission on international trade law. (n.d.). Status: Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) (the “New York Convention”). United Nations Commission On International Trade Law. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/conventions/foreign_arbitral_awards/status2
[15]. L. Zheng, Y. Chen, Approaches to investment arbitration in international tax disputes and its enlightenment to tax arbitration: Analysis of the British Cairn Company v. India, Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 3, 2022, pp. 126-140.
[16]. G. Caspary, S. Berghaus, The charging nature of foreign direct investment in developing countries: evidence and implications, Journal of World Investment & Trade, vol. 5, no. 4, 2004, pp. 683-706.
Cite this article
Lin,X. (2023). Influence of International Investment Arbitration Under the International Law. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,4,243-252.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Economic Management and Green Development (ICEMGD 2022), Part Ⅱ
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. G. Behrman, The most noble adventure: the Marshall Plan and how America helped rebuild Europe, Free Press, 2008.
[2]. D. F. Vacts, Host country faces the multinational enterprise, Boston University Law Review, vol. 53, no. 2, 1973, pp. 261-277.
[3]. H. V. Perlmutter, Perplexing Routes to M.N.E Legitimacy: Codes of Conduct for Technology Transfer, Stanford Journal of International Studies, vol. 11, 1976, pp. 169-199.
[4]. C. Wang, Employment Research in the Process of Economic Globalization, Economic Science Press, 2007.
[5]. Z. Kong, The key to developing export trade lies in the continuous upgrading of products, International Business Research, vol. 1, no. 2, 1986, pp. 18-19.
[6]. E. Mitchell, Reciprocal convergences: how china might influence western corporate governance, Business & Finance Law Review, vol. 2, no. 1, 2018, pp. 77-139.
[7]. J. J. Norton, Multinational companies: of institutional 'spheres of influence', corporate social responsibility and meaningful financial sector law reform for developing countries, European Business Law Review, vol. 20, no. 1, 2009, pp. 1-62.
[8]. R. Clara, S. Christoph, Human Rights and International Investment Arbitration, Oxford University Press, 2009. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199578184.003.0004
[9]. Y. Levashova, The Accountability and Corporate Social Responsibility of Multinational Corporations for Transgressions in Host States through International Investment Law, Utrecht Law Review, vol. 14, no. 2, 2018, pp. 40-55. DOI: 10.18352/ulr.441
[10]. C. F. Salans, The 1985 rules of the London court of international arbitration, Arbitration International, vol. 2, no. 1, 1986, pp. 40-56.
[11]. X. Shi, The Relativity of the Finality of the First Arbitration in International Commercial Arbitration, Journal of Chang'an University: Social Science Edition, vol. 11(4), no. 7, 2009. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6248.2009.04.012
[12]. C. A. Rogers, The politics of international investment arbitrators, Santa Clara Journal of International Law, vol. 12, no. 1, 2013, pp. 223-262.
[13]. Z. Zhou, The Advantages of Commercial Arbitration over Litigation, Its Development Trend and Suggestions, Legal System and Economics, vol. 6, 2020, pp. 62-63.
[14]. United nations commission on international trade law. (n.d.). Status: Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) (the “New York Convention”). United Nations Commission On International Trade Law. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/conventions/foreign_arbitral_awards/status2
[15]. L. Zheng, Y. Chen, Approaches to investment arbitration in international tax disputes and its enlightenment to tax arbitration: Analysis of the British Cairn Company v. India, Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 3, 2022, pp. 126-140.
[16]. G. Caspary, S. Berghaus, The charging nature of foreign direct investment in developing countries: evidence and implications, Journal of World Investment & Trade, vol. 5, no. 4, 2004, pp. 683-706.