
Analysis on the Mandarin Vowel System and the English Vowel System
- 1 The International Division of The High School Affiliated to Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
A large number of second-language learners, no matter Chinese learners of English or English learners of Mandarin, find it hard to pronounce different sounds from different language systems. This is a vital issue to be solved in language speaking and especially in language teaching. There is an interesting phenomenon that most Chinese learners of English are poor at speaking, although they might get good grades in reading and listening. For English learners of Mandarin, it is also tough since some sounds in Mandarin do not appear or appear infrequently in English. This paper introduces the two vowel systems of Mandarin and English and compares and explains the differences between them by reviewing previous research. All the data come from quoting materials. To conclude, the English vowel system and the Mandarin vowel system are different in classification and tone, and both languages have some sounds that are not involved in the other language. There are some methods that make it easier for language learners to pronounce better.
Keywords
vowel system, Mandarin, English, learning, speaking
[1]. Crawford, H.T. (1885) The Massoretic Vowel-System. Hebraica 1(3), 137–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/527366.
[2]. Shang, C.Y., Bu, Y.H. (2009) Error Analysis of English Vowels Based on Experimental Phonetics. Journal of Tianshui Normal University, 135-137.
[3]. McMahon, A. (2002) An introduction to English Phonology, Edinburgh University Press.
[4]. Wu, C. (2014) The Movement of Vowels and Its Variations in English: An Experimental Analysis. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (Social Science edition) 36(4), 334-340.
[5]. Wang, L. (1935) From the nature of the vowel sound to the tone of the Chinese language. Journal of Tsinghua University (Natural Science Edition) (01), 157-183. doi:10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.1935.01.007.
[6]. Liang, Z.A. (1965) The relationship between the recognition rate of unit sound and the length of syllable. Institute of Physiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai.
[7]. Bao, H.P., Li L.G. (2019) Study on the Teaching Method of Fuyuan Sound and Verbal in Putonghua. Education Informatization Forum (05), 26-27.
[8]. Best, C.T. (1995) A direct realist view of crosslanugage speech perception. Speech perception and linguistic experience: theoretical and methodological issues. Timonium: New York Press 171-204.
[9]. Lively, S.E., Pisoni, D.B. (1994) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long—term retention of new phonetic categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96, 2076. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.410149.
[10]. Zhou, Y.L. (2021) The influence of dialects and Putonghua on English phonetics: A case study of Ningde Region. Overseas English (23), 162-164.
Cite this article
Huang,Y. (2023). Analysis on the Mandarin Vowel System and the English Vowel System. Communications in Humanities Research,3,829-832.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies (ICIHCS 2022), Part 1
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).