Research Article
Open access
Published on 7 December 2023
Download pdf
Lu,A. (2023). Amplifying NGO Messages with Critical Incidents: A Comparative Analysis of the Impact of New Media Disruption and Legacy Media in Journalism . Communications in Humanities Research,18,8-13.
Export citation

Amplifying NGO Messages with Critical Incidents: A Comparative Analysis of the Impact of New Media Disruption and Legacy Media in Journalism

Anjin Lu *,1,
  • 1 the University of Sheffield

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/18/20231104

Abstract

This paper explores the use of traditional and new media by Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) for effective communication. It argues that NGOs should leverage different media forms based on specific circumstances. The paper discusses Farm Radio International’s use of radio and mobile phones to engage farmers in dialogue, empowering them to voice their concerns. It also highlights the #blogladesh campaign, where mommy bloggers were utilized to raise awareness of women’s and children’s health issues. By using traditional media, NGOs can reach a wider audience, particularly in marginalized communities. New media, on the other hand, offers personalized and interactive communication. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each media form enables NGOs to effectively convey their messages, enhance communication effectiveness, and achieve their mission and goals.

Keywords

NGO, journalism, new media, legacy media, critical incidents

[1]. Waltzer, M. (1998) “The Idea of Civil Society: A Path to Social Reconstruction,” in E.J, Dionne (ed.) Community Works: The Revival of Civil Society in America. Washington, DC.: Brookings Institution Press.

[2]. Alexander, J. (2006) “The Civil Sphere”. New York. Oxford University Press.

[3]. Cottle, S., & Nolan, D. (2007). “Global humanitarianism and the changing aid-media field: Everyone was dying for footage”. Journalism Studies, 8(6), 862–878.

[4]. Mattoni, A. Treré, E. (2014). Media practices, mediation processes, and mediatization in the study of social movements, Communication Theory, 24(3): 252-271.

[5]. Zelizer, B. (1992). CNN, the Gulf War, and journalistic practice. Journal of Communication, 42(1), 66–81. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00769.x.

[6]. Mhagama, P. (2015). Radio listening clubs in Malawi as alternative public spheres. Radio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 13(1), pp.105–120. Doi https://doi.org/10.1386/rjao.13.1-2.105_1.

[7]. Brecht, B. (1927). The radio as an apparatus of communication. In A. GumucioDagron & T. Tufte (Eds.), Communication for social change anthology: Historical and contemporary readings (pp. 2–3). New Jersey: CFSC Consortium. (Reprinted from Der Rundfunk als Kommunikationsapparat, Berliner Börsen-Courier)

[8]. Tamminga, P. (1997), Is Community Radio an Effective Tool for Grassroots Development?: A Case Study of Two Honduran NGO’s, Ottawa: Simon Frazer University.

[9]. Freire, P. (1970), Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: Seabury Press. —— (1983), ‘The importance of the act of reading’, Journal of Education, 165: 1, pp. 5–11.

[10]. Harcup, T., & O’Neill, D. (2010). What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies, 2(2), 261–280.

[11]. Myers, M., 2008. Radio and Development in Africa – A Concept Paper Prepared for the IDRC by Mary Myers.

[12]. Buckley, S., Duer., K., Mendel, T and O Siochru, S. 2008 Broadcasting, Voice and Accountability World Bank Institute: Washington D.C.

[13]. Putzel, J. and van der Zwan., J. 2005 Why Templates for Media Development do not work in Crisis States Crisis States Research Centre, LSE: London.

[14]. Nations, U. (n.d.). Millennium Development Goals Summit. [online] United Nations. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/newyork2010.

[15]. O’Reilly, A. (2010). Encyclopedia of motherhood. SAGE.

[16]. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2013). The strategic ritual of emotionality: A case study of Pulitzer prize-winning articles. Journalism, 14(1), 129–145. doi:10.1177/1464884912448918.

[17]. Fieldcraft Studios. (2012). Blogadesh [Video]. Vimeo. https://vimeo.com/48363582.

[18]. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Emotions, media, and politics. Polity Press.

[19]. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2015). Resisting epistemologies of user-generated content? Cooptation, segregation, and the boundaries of journalism. In M. Carlson & S. C. Lewis (Eds.), Boundaries of journalism: Professionalism, practices, and participation (pp 169–186). Routledge.

[20]. Cooper, G. (2018). Reporting humanitarian disasters in a social media age (1st ed.). Routledge.

[21]. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry.

[22]. Jarvis, J. (2011). Public parts : how sharing in the digital age improves the way we work and live. New York: Simon & Schuster, p.11.

[23]. Biswas M (2007). Developmental Issues in News Media: NGO-Media Interaction in Bangladesh. Int. J. Not-for-Profit Law 9(3): 77-95.

Cite this article

Lu,A. (2023). Amplifying NGO Messages with Critical Incidents: A Comparative Analysis of the Impact of New Media Disruption and Legacy Media in Journalism . Communications in Humanities Research,18,8-13.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies

Conference website: https://www.icihcs.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-179-7(Print) / 978-1-83558-180-3(Online)
Conference date: 15 November 2023
Editor:Enrique Mallen, Javier Cifuentes-Faura
Series: Communications in Humanities Research
Volume number: Vol.18
ISSN:2753-7064(Print) / 2753-7072(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).