
From Saussure to Lacan: The Primacy of the Signifier
- 1 Rutgers University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Ferdinand de Saussure, often regarded as the father of modern linguistics, proposed that language is a system of signs. His introduction of the symbolic system and linguistic signs later triggered a wave of structuralism in academia and had a profound impact on the early works of Jacques Lacan. Saussure believed in the primacy of the signified, that is, the concept having precedence over the signifier, a notion contested by psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan. This paper offers an in-depth interpretation of Lacan’s example, highlighting the primacy of the signifier within the sign system and refuting Saussure’s view of the primacy of the signified. Lacan revised and corrected Saussure’s concepts of the signifier and signified, noting that the concept is merely the effect of differentially related symbols. Building on this, the paper further details the perspectives of structuralism and attempts to reveal the origin and synchronic characteristics of the symbolic system from a philosophical viewpoint. Additionally, the paper discusses Lacan’s concept of the “master signifier,” underscoring its significance in the critique of ideology.
Keywords
Lacan, Saussure, Structuralism, Psychoanalysis, Signifier and Signified
[1]. Saussure, F. (1916) Course in General Linguistics. Peter Owen Limited.
[2]. Marrone, G. (2020) Structure/Structuralism. Glossary of Morphology. 491-495.
[3]. Lagopoulos, A. & Boklund-Lagopoulou, K. (2021). Theory and Methodology of Semiotics: The Tradition of Ferdinand de Saussure. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
[4]. Susen, S. (2018) Saussure, Ferdinand de. In: Turner, B. S., Kyung-Sup, C., Epstein, C. F., Kivisto, P., Outhwaite, W. & Ryan, J. M. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
[5]. De Andrade, S. & Oliveira, C. (2020) Signo Linguístico: Saussure E Lacan Linguistic Sign: Saussure and Lacan. Discursos Verbais E Verbovisuais.
[6]. Ahmad, M. (2020) Deconstructing Bond of Signifier & Signified: a Corpus-Based Study of Variation in Meaning. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 6(4), 76-87.
[7]. Lacan, J. (2006) Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English. WW Norton & Company.
[8]. Rapaport, H. (2018) Structuralism and Semiotics. The Bloomsbury Handbook of Literary and Cultural Theory.
[9]. Barnouw, J. (1981) Signification and Meaning: A Critique of the Saussurean Conception of the Sign. Comparative Literature Studies, 18(3), 260.
[10]. Lacan, J., & Miller, J.-A. (Ed.). (1993) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book 3: The Psychoses 1955-1956. W. W. Norton & Company.
[11]. Nicolar, C. (2019) Structuralism, A New Philosophical Perspective On The World And Sciences In The Early 20th Century. InterCulturalia, 2018, 189.
Cite this article
Yi,X. (2024). From Saussure to Lacan: The Primacy of the Signifier. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,43,208-214.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Psychology and Humanity Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).