
Reforms on the WTO Dispute Settlement System from the Perspective of the Appellate Body
- 1 The Affiliated International School of Shenzhen University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
With the deepening of the trade distribution between great powers, such as the US-China trade war, there are a lot of problems with the system of the WTO. The WTO should be reformed to address these problems. This paper specifies the reforms of the WTO Dispute Settlement System from the perspective of the Appellate Body. It expounds on the background of the suspension of the Appellate Body, the US's claims on the Appellate Body, and the necessity to function the Appellate Body. Finally, several measures to reform the Appellate Body, such as establishing the compliance committee and the vote selection system, monetary compensation, and recovering credibility, are put forward in this paper.
Keywords
Dispute Settlement System, Appellate Body, Reform
[1]. Amrita Bahri,2019.“Appellate Body Held Hostage”: Is Judicial Activism at Fair Trial?’ Journal of World Trade, Vol 53 No. 2: 293 – 315
[2]. Natalie Regoli,2019,“16 Advantages and Disadvantages of Judicial Precedent” https://connectusfund.org/6-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-judicial-precedent
[3]. Aditya Rathore and Ashutosh Bajpai,2020, “The WTO Appellate Body Crisis: How We Got Here and What Lies Ahead?” https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2020/04/rathore-bajpai-wto-appellate-body-crisis/
[4]. Jennifer Hillman, 2020.A Reset of the World Trade Organization's Appellate Body. https:cftr.org/reset-world-trade-organizations-appellate-body“
[5]. Jiaying Liu, 2022.On the Predicament and Future Reform Path of the WTO Dispute Settlement System. https://journal.julypress.com/index.php/ajsss/article/view/1107/821
[6]. Tolulope Anthony Adekola,2019,”US–China trade war and the WTO dispute settlement mechanism Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, Vol: 18 No: 3: 125-135
Cite this article
Wang,X. (2024). Reforms on the WTO Dispute Settlement System from the Perspective of the Appellate Body. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,44,11-15.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).