The Impact of the Artificial Intelligence Act on ChatGPT

Research Article
Open access

The Impact of the Artificial Intelligence Act on ChatGPT

Yijie Wang 1*
  • 1 University of San Francisco    
  • *corresponding author ywang437@dons.usfca.edu
Published on 18 April 2024 | https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/44/20230134
LNEP Vol.44
ISSN (Print): 2753-7056
ISSN (Online): 2753-7048
ISBN (Print): 978-1-83558-357-9
ISBN (Online): 978-1-83558-358-6

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence, represented by ChatGPT, has the ability to generate new content based on automatic learning, which not only triggers a productivity revolution but also poses legal regulatory challenges. ChatGPT can pose challenges such as privacy infringement, data security risks, and intellectual property rights confirmation and protection challenges. The Artificial Intelligence Act adopts measures such as compliance control for data collection, technology governance technology, and optimization of data management methods. Not only does ChatGPT prevent excessive blurring of the trust boundary between humans and machines, but it also configures different disclosure obligations based on the user's level of professionalism.

Keywords:

ChatGPT, Generative artificial intelligence, The Artificial Intelligence Act, Legal regulation

Wang,Y. (2024). The Impact of the Artificial Intelligence Act on ChatGPT. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,44,185-192.
Export citation

References

[1]. Helberger, N., & Diakopoulos, N. (2023). ChatGPT and the AI Act. Internet Policy Review, 12(1).

[2]. Choi, J. H., Hickman, K. E., Monahan, A., & Schwarcz, D. (2023). ChatGPT goes to law school. Available at SSRN.

[3]. Van Dis, E. A., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224-226.

[4]. Hsu, T., & Thompson, S. A. (2023). Disinformation researchers raise alarms about AI chatbots. New York Times.

[5]. Madiega, T. (2021). Artificial intelligence act. European Parliament: European Parliamentary Research Service.

[6]. Gandhi, P. A., & Talwar, V. (2023). Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT in the legal context. Int J Med Sci, 10, 1-2.

[7]. Panigutti, C., Hamon, R., Hupont, I., Fernandez Llorca, D., Fano Yela, D., Junklewitz, H., ... & Gomez, E. (2023, June). The role of explainable AI in the context of the AI Act. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1139-1150).

[8]. Veale, M., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. (2021). Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act—Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach. Computer Law Review International, 22(4), 97-112.

[9]. Sovrano, F., Sapienza, S., Palmirani, M., & Vitali, F. (2022). Metrics, explainability and the European AI act proposal. J, 5(1), 126-138.

[10]. Ebers, M. (2021). Standardizing AI-The Case of the European Commission's Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act. The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence: global perspectives on law and ethics.

[11]. Schwemer, S. F., Tomada, L., & Pasini, T. (2021, June). Legal Ai systems in the EU’s proposed artificial intelligence act. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on AI and Intelligent Assistance for Legal Professionals in the Digital Workplace (LegalAIIA 2021), held in conjunction with ICAIL.

[12]. Schuett, J. (2023). Risk management in the artificial intelligence act. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1-19.

[13]. Neuwirth, R. J. (2022). The EU artificial intelligence act: regulating subliminal AI systems. Taylor & Francis.

[14]. Engler, A. (2022). The EU AI Act will have global impact, but a limited Brussels Effect.

[15]. Kop, M. (2021, September). Eu artificial intelligence act: The European approach to ai. Stanford-Vienna Transatlantic Technology Law Forum, Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments, Stanford University, Issue.

Cite this article

Wang,Y. (2024). The Impact of the Artificial Intelligence Act on ChatGPT. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,44,185-192.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities

ISBN：978-1-83558-357-9(Print) / 978-1-83558-358-6(Online)
Editor：Enrique Mallen, Javier Cifuentes-Faura
Conference website: https://www.icgpsh.org/
Conference date: 13 October 2023
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.44
ISSN：2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Helberger, N., & Diakopoulos, N. (2023). ChatGPT and the AI Act. Internet Policy Review, 12(1).

[2]. Choi, J. H., Hickman, K. E., Monahan, A., & Schwarcz, D. (2023). ChatGPT goes to law school. Available at SSRN.

[3]. Van Dis, E. A., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224-226.

[4]. Hsu, T., & Thompson, S. A. (2023). Disinformation researchers raise alarms about AI chatbots. New York Times.

[5]. Madiega, T. (2021). Artificial intelligence act. European Parliament: European Parliamentary Research Service.

[6]. Gandhi, P. A., & Talwar, V. (2023). Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT in the legal context. Int J Med Sci, 10, 1-2.

[7]. Panigutti, C., Hamon, R., Hupont, I., Fernandez Llorca, D., Fano Yela, D., Junklewitz, H., ... & Gomez, E. (2023, June). The role of explainable AI in the context of the AI Act. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1139-1150).

[8]. Veale, M., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. (2021). Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act—Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach. Computer Law Review International, 22(4), 97-112.

[9]. Sovrano, F., Sapienza, S., Palmirani, M., & Vitali, F. (2022). Metrics, explainability and the European AI act proposal. J, 5(1), 126-138.

[10]. Ebers, M. (2021). Standardizing AI-The Case of the European Commission's Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act. The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence: global perspectives on law and ethics.

[11]. Schwemer, S. F., Tomada, L., & Pasini, T. (2021, June). Legal Ai systems in the EU’s proposed artificial intelligence act. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on AI and Intelligent Assistance for Legal Professionals in the Digital Workplace (LegalAIIA 2021), held in conjunction with ICAIL.

[12]. Schuett, J. (2023). Risk management in the artificial intelligence act. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1-19.

[13]. Neuwirth, R. J. (2022). The EU artificial intelligence act: regulating subliminal AI systems. Taylor & Francis.

[14]. Engler, A. (2022). The EU AI Act will have global impact, but a limited Brussels Effect.

[15]. Kop, M. (2021, September). Eu artificial intelligence act: The European approach to ai. Stanford-Vienna Transatlantic Technology Law Forum, Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments, Stanford University, Issue.

For authors
Guide for authors Policies for authors Aims and scope Subscription Open access policy
For editors
Policies for editors Editorial board
For reviewers
Policies for reviewers Privacy policy

Cookies are used by this site.
Copyright © 2024 EWA Publishing, its licensors, and contributors. All rights reserved, including text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.