Download pdf
Challenging Gender Stereotypes and Promoting Female Empowerment: A Feminist Analysis of "Legally Blonde"
- 1 United World College South East Asia
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The focal point of this paper is a comprehensive feminist scrutiny of the romantic comedy movie "Legally Blonde" (2001). It studies how this film questions olden gender stereotypes, encourages female empowerment and raises issues of gender discrimination and social classes. Through an analysis of the details in the movie's plot and characters, especially Elle Woods, this research delves deep into numerous feminist topics. These include going against the norm of the 'dumb blonde' stereotype, showing that women are not one-dimensional but multifaceted individuals, emphasizing the importance of female solidarity and mentorship, as well as pointing out gender bias that exists in male-dominated fields. By referencing both feminist film theory and intersectionality, this article points out where the movie fails regarding racial diversity, which limits its perspective portrayal-wise. Further, it discusses why "Legally Blonde" should be taken as more than just a movie but rather viewed from a broader perspective, considering its implications on popular media portrayal of feminists. Even with its downsides, this research suggests that "Legally Blonde" stands high among cultural texts that provoke audiences to rethink norms governing gender roles expected by society, in turn appreciating women for who they are and what they can offer.
Keywords
Legally Blonde, feminism, gender stereotypes, female empowerment, gender roles
[1]. Ferriss, S., & Young, M. (Eds.). (2008). Chick-flicks: Contemporary women at the movies. Routledge.
[2]. Radner, H. (2010). Neo-feminist cinema: Girly films, chick flicks, and consumer culture. Routledge.
[3]. Crenshaw, K. W. (2013). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In The public nature of private violence (pp. 93-118). Routledge.
[4]. Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (Eds.). (2013). New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. Springer.
[5]. Greenwood, D., & Isbell, L. M. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and the dumb blonde: Men's and women's reactions to sexist jokes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 341-350.
[6]. Frith, K., Shaw, P., & Cheng, H. (2005). The construction of beauty: A cross‐cultural analysis of women's magazine advertising. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 56-70.
[7]. Cobb, S. (2011). "I'm nothing like you!" Postfeminist Generationalism and Female Stardom in the Contemporary Chick Flick. In Women on Screen: Feminism and Femininity in Visual Culture (pp. 31-44). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[8]. Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European journal of cultural studies, 10(2), 147-166.
[9]. Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: a meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological bulletin, 134(3), 460.
[10]. Hollinger, K. (2013). The actress: Hollywood acting and the female star. Routledge.
[11]. Collins, P. H. (2022). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
[12]. Ragins, B. R., & Kram, K. E. (2007). The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice. Sage Publications.
[13]. Tasker, Y., & Negra, D. (2007). Introduction: Feminist politics and postfeminist culture. Interrogating postfeminism: Gender and the politics of popular culture, 1.
[14]. Rhode, D. L. (1989). Justice and gender: Sex discrimination and the law. Harvard University Press.
[15]. Levinson, J. D., & Young, D. (2010). Implicit gender bias in the legal profession: An empirical study. Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y, 18, 1.
[16]. McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2012). Sexual harassment, workplace authority, and the paradox of power. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 625-647.
[17]. Bogoch, B. (1999). Courtroom discourse and the gendered construction of professional identity. Law & Social Inquiry, 24(2), 329-375.
[18]. Belknap, J. (2020). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice. Sage Publications.
[19]. Crenshaw, K. (2013). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In Feminist legal theories (pp. 23-51). Routledge.
[20]. Mastro, D. (2009). Effects of racial and ethnic stereotyping. In Media effects (pp. 341-357). Routledge.
[21]. Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular feminism and popular misogyny. Duke University Press.
[22]. Harzewski, S. (2011). Chick lit and postfeminism. University of Virginia Press.
[23]. Mulvey, L., Backman Rogers, A., & Van Den Oever, A. (2015). Feminist film studies 40 years after 'Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema', a triologue. NECSUS: European Journal of Media Studies, 4(1), 67-79.
Cite this article
He,Y. (2024). Challenging Gender Stereotypes and Promoting Female Empowerment: A Feminist Analysis of "Legally Blonde". Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,54,338-345.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).