Research Article
Open access
Published on 31 July 2024
Download pdf
He,X. (2024). A Comparison of Education for Sustainable Development in East Asian Countries - Take China and Japan as Examples. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,58,105-116.
Export citation

A Comparison of Education for Sustainable Development in East Asian Countries - Take China and Japan as Examples

Xinyuan He *,1,
  • 1 The Education University of Hong Kong

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/58/20241706

Abstract

In recent years, Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) has emerged as a prominent topic of discourse within the United Nations and among various nations worldwide. The primary objective of these discussions is the establishment of a sustainable society, with ESD playing a crucial role in attaining this goal. This paper undertakes a comparative analysis of ESD-related policies and curricula in two East Asian countries, namely Japan and China. Through a detailed examination of their respective approaches, the paper identifies key strengths and areas for improvement in both nations' strategies. Additionally, the paper offers several constructive recommendations designed to enhance the effectiveness of ESD initiatives in these countries. It is also hoped that this paper will not only contribute valuable insights to the ongoing ESD efforts in Japan and China but also inspire innovative approaches and strategies in other countries seeking to advance their ESD agendas.

Keywords

Education for Sustainable Development, Policy, Curriculum Provision

[1]. Niu, D., Jiang, D., & Li, F. (2010). Higher EFS in China. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(2), 153-162.

[2]. Huckle, J., & Wals, A. E. (2015). The UN Decade of EFS: business as usual in the end. Environmental Education Research, 21(3), 491-505.

[3]. Jackson, L. (2017). ‘Asian’perspectives on EFS. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(5), 473-479.

[4]. Lee, S. W., Ma, S. C., & Lee, N. (2022). Delivering programs on EFS (ESD) and UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Mainland China and the Hong Kong special administrative region: An assessment of the Hong Kong institute of EFS. In Sustainable tertiary education in Asia: Policies, practices, and developments (pp. 43-65). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

[5]. Fredriksson, U., N. Kusanagi, K., Gougoulakis, P., Matsuda, Y., & Kitamura, Y. (2020). A comparative study of curriculums for EFS (ESD) in Sweden and Japan. Sustainability, 12(3), 1123.

[6]. Huai-xin, Z., & Dillon, J. (2001). EFS: A Sino-English comparative study in environmental education. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 2(3), 342-347.

[7]. Han, Q. (2015). EFS and climate change education in China: A status report. Journal of EFS, 9(1), 62-77.

[8]. Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on higher EFS, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11(8), 2401.

[9]. Tanaka, H. (2017). Current state and future prospects of EFS (ESD) in Japan. Educational Studies in Japan, 11, 15-28.

[10]. Morita, K., Okitasari, M., & Masuda, H. (2020). Analysis of national and local governance systems to achieve the sustainable development goals: case studies of Japan and Indonesia. Sustainability Science, 15, 179-202.

[11]. Laurie, R., Nonoyama-Tarumi, Y., Mckeown, R., & Hopkins, C. (2016). Contributions of EFS (ESD) to quality education: A synthesis of research. Journal of EFS, 10(2), 226-242.

[12]. Xu, Z., Chau, S. N., Chen, X., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Dietz, T., ... & Liu, J. (2020). Assessing progress towards sustainable development over space and time. Nature, 577(7788), 74-78.

[13]. Watanabe, R. (2015). Implementation of EFS (ESD) in Japan: A qualitative case study of formal education in Kesennuma City.

[14]. Li, G., Xi, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2022). The way to sustainability: EFS in China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(4), 611-624.

[15]. Japanese National Commission for UNESCO: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Website. (2018, July 5). Available from: https://www.mext.go.jp/unesco/.

[16]. Hachinagawa Elementary School, Koto Ward, Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology website. (2021, June 14). Available at: https://www.mext.go.jp/unesco/sdgs_koujireisyu_education/detail/1418171.htm

Cite this article

He,X. (2024). A Comparison of Education for Sustainable Development in East Asian Countries - Take China and Japan as Examples. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,58,105-116.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries

Conference website: https://www.iceipi.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-535-1(Print) / 978-1-83558-536-8(Online)
Conference date: 12 July 2024
Editor:Mallen Enrique
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.58
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).