Download pdf
Comparison of Compulsory Education Between China and Britain
- 1 University of Shanghai for Science and Technology
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The different political landscapes and historical contexts of China and the UK have given rise to unique features within their compulsory education frameworks. In the Chinese school system, the authority of the teacher is paramount, a didactic approach prevails, and a one-size-fits-all strategy is often applied, a process akin to the force-feeding of knowledge. In stark contrast, the British educational ethos tends to encourage students' individual passions and originality, and emphasises personal growth and development. This research seeks to shed light on the differences between the compulsory education systems of these two nations through an in-depth comparative examination of four key aspects including definition, Curriculum, teachers and social. The ultimate aim of this analysis is to make constructive recommendations that could refine and strengthen the educational structures of both countries, thereby supporting their continued progress and development. The two countries can combine their compulsory education models to make up for the shortcomings in their respective education systems.
Keywords
Comparison of compulsory, Chinese education, British education, Education system, Education quality
[1]. Oxford English Dictionary. (2020). Retrieved from the Oxford English Dictionary website. https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/59584.
[2]. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European journal of teacher education. 40(3), pp. 291-309.
[3]. Li, J., & Xue, E. (2021). Compulsory education policy in China: Concept and practice. Springer Singapore.
[4]. Department for Education. (2010). The School System in England. The Stationery Office.
[5]. National Compulsory Education Curriculum Plan (2011 edition)
[6]. Wang, Y. (2023). Analysis of the Differences between the Chinese and British General High School Education Systems. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 398-405.
[7]. Wang P. (2015). Differences in China and English education. Journal of Central Institute of Socialism (06), 103-107
[8]. Teach, R. & (2023, December 3). Preparing for teaching in China: A comprehensive guide. Teaching Jobs Abroad.
[9]. Check you’re eligible to apply for qualified teacher status (QTS). Apply for qualified teacher status (QTS) in England. (n.d.). https://apply-for-qts-in-england.education.gov.uk/eligibility/start
[10]. British education system. The British Education System, UK School System, Bright World. (n.d.). https://www.brightworldguardianships.com/en/guardianship/british-education-system/
[11]. Jin, L. & Cortazzi, M. (2006). Changing practices in Chinese cultures of learning. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310608668751
[12]. UK, Education statistics. CEIC. (n.d.). https://www.ceicdata.com.cn/zh-hans/united-kingdom/education-statistics?page=2
[13]. Niancai, L., Zhuolin, F., & Wang, Q. (2024). Education in China and the world: Achievements and contemporary issues. Springer Singapore Pte. Limited.
[14]. Levenberg, L., Neilson, T., & Rheams, D. (2018). Research methods for the Digital Humanities. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cite this article
Gao,Y. (2024). Comparison of Compulsory Education Between China and Britain. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,62,122-128.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).