
A Comparative Study of China and U.S.: The Influence of Digital Divide on Education Inequality and Its Mitigating Policies
- 1 Wellesley College
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Under the digital age, the method of learning expanded to the virtual setting. With resources shared through online platforms, digital divide became a new problem in achieving education equality. This paper intends to examine the effect of digital divide on educational system in the U.S. and China from a comparative perspective. This study adopts literature review as its research method. Types of digital divide that occurs in the two countries showcase some similarities, yet the factors attributing to the educational digital divide varies widely. Educational divide exists in different social groups. Systematic and cultural differences are the root behind these factors. In the U.S., digital divide occurred due to differences at multiple levels: race, state, schools, and family SES. In China, digital divide occurs due to geological divergence, generational division, and social class. The root Moreover, mitigating policies from the two countries illustrate how the U.S. and China access the issue from different perspective. The root behind such contrast is the difference in the two countries’ social system and cultural attitudes. The two countries can inspire each other and the world in creating better solutions to solve this new form of education inequality.
Keywords
Digital divide, Education inequality, Policies, U.S., China
[1]. Anderson, Terry., Rivera Vargas, Pablo. (2020) A Critical look at Educational Technology from a Distance Education Perspective.Digital Education Review,37,208-229. doi:10.1344/der.2020.37.208-229. hdl:2445/172738. ISSN 2013-9144. S2CID 225664918
[2]. Wang, Ping, et al. (2024) Unveiling the Dynamics of Educational Equity: Exploring the Third Type of Digital Divide for Primary and Secondary Schools in China.Sustainability, vol.16, no.11, 4868.ProQuest, https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114868.
[3]. Notten, Natascha, et al. (2009) Research Note: Digital Divide across Borders-A Cross-National Study of Adolescents’ Use of Digital Technologies.European Sociological Review, vol. 25, no. 5, 551-60. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27745235.
[4]. Rye, Stale Angen. (2008) Exploring the Gap of the Digital Divide: Conditions of Connectivity and Higher Education Participation.GeoJournal, vol. 71, no. 2/3, 171-84. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41148249.
[5]. Wang, Pei-Yu. (2013) Examining the Digital Divide Between Rural and Urban Schools: Technology Availability, Teachers’ Integration Level and Students’ Perception. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, vol. 2, no. 2, https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v2n2p127.
[6]. Kuo-Hsun, Josef, MA. (2021) The Digital Divide at School and at Home: A Comparison Between Schools by Socioeconomic Level Across 47 Countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, vol. 62, no. 2, 115–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152211023540.
[7]. Attewell, Paul. (2001) Comment: The First and Second Digital Divides. Sociology of Education, vol. 74, no. 3, 252–59. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2673277.
[8]. Valadez, James R., and Richard Duran. (2007) Redefining the Digital Divide: Beyond Access to Computers and the Internet. The High School Journal, vol. 90, no. 3, 31–44. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40364198.
[9]. Frei-Landau, Rivi, and Orit Avidov-Ungar. (2022) Educational Equity Amidst COVID-19: Exploring the Online Learning Challenges of Bedouin and Jewish Female Preservice Teachers in Israel. Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 111, 103623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103623.
[10]. Gan, Isabel, and Rui Sun. (2021) Digital Barriers and Individual Coping Behaviors in Distance Education During COVID-19. International Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 18, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.4018/ijkm.290023.
[11]. U.S. Department of Education. (2024)Office of Educational Technology, National Educational Technology Plan, Washington, DC.
[12]. Galanek, J. D., Gierdowski, D. C., & Brooks, D. C. (2018) ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2018. Louisville, CO: ECAR.
[13]. Vegas, Emiliana, and Victoria Collis. (2020) Unequally Disconnected: Access to Online Learning in the US.”Brookings, www.brookings.edu/articles/unequally-disconnected-access-to-online-learning-in-the-us.
[14]. School of education. (2024) Understanding the Digital Divide in Education | AU. School of Education Online, soeonline.american.edu/blog/digital-divide-in-education.
[15]. Buzzetto-Hollywood, Nicole A., et al. (2018) Addressing Information Literacy and the Digital Divide in Higher Education. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-skills and Lifelong Learning, 14,77-93. https://doi.org/10.28945/4029.
[16]. US Department of Education. (ED) Federal Role in Education. www2.ed.gov/about/overview/fed/role.html.
[17]. Ward, Micah. (2023) In The Spotlight: See How These 5 States Are Modeling Edtech Innovation. District Administration,districtadministration.com/in-the-spotlight-see-how-these-5-states-are-modeling-edtech-innovation.
[18]. US Census Bureau.(2021)U.S. Census Bureau Releases Household Pulse Survey Results. Census.gov, www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2020/household-pulse-results.html.
[19]. Herold, Benjamin.(2021)Elite Private Schools Use Wide Range of Ed-Tech Strategies. Education Week, www.edweek.org/policy-politics/elite-private-schools-use-wide-range-of-ed-tech-strategies/2015/03.
[20]. Pierce, Emily, and Cole Claybourn. (2023)Private School vs. Public School.U.S. News, www.usnews.com/education/k12/articles/private-school-vs-public-school.
[21]. Robinson, Laura, et al.(2018) Interlocking Inequalities: Digital Stratification Meets Academic Stratification. American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 62, no. 9, 1251-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218773826.
[22]. Hanson, Melanie.(2023)Average Cost of Private School [2023]: Tuition by Education Level.Education Data Initiative, educationdata.org/average-cost-of-private-school.
[23]. Jiao, Youxi, and Xiulan Yu. (2024) Gain or Loss? The Impact of Internet Use on Academic Achievement in Generation Z. Chinese Journal of Distance Education, 44, 1, CNKI, https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.20231129.001.
[24]. Wen, J., Hussain, H., Jiang, R., & Waheed, J. (2023) Overcoming the Digital Divide with ICT Diffusion: Multivariate and Spatial Analysis at China’s Provincial Level. Sage Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231159323
[25]. Jing, Peng, and Lijie Lv. (2023) Bridging the Digital Divide: International Lessons and Local Responses in the Digital Transformation of Education. Journal of National Academy of Education Administration, 46–56.
[26]. Kang, Yuqiong, and Feiyue Jiang. (2024)Opportunities and Strategies for Remote Education in Rural Areas in the Context of ‘Technology Empowering Education.’ Education Exploration, 1-5.
[27]. Yang, Yihua, et al. (2013) Roots of Tomorrow’s Digital Divide: Documenting Computer Use and Internet Access in China’s Elementary Schools Today. China & World Economy, vol. 21, no. 3, 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-124x.2013.12022.x.
[28]. Gu, Jiafeng. (2021)Family Conditions and the Accessibility of Online Education: The Digital Divide and Mediating Factors.Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 15, p. 8590. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158590.
[29]. Song, Yu, et al. (2021) Age-Related Digital Divide During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health/International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 21, 11285. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111285.
[30]. Xu, Yanfeng, et al. (2023) Custodial Grandchildren’s School Attendance and Academic Performance During COVID-19: The Role of Technology. Societies, vol. 13, no. 10, 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13100215.
[31]. Sun, Yi. (2021)[China] Grandparents’ Co-parenting in Urban China and Its Influence on Parents and Children - Projects.Child Research Net, www.childresearch.net/projects/ecec/2021_05.html.
[32]. Yu, Jian, and Zhonggen Zhang. (2021)Does Living with Grandparents Affect Children’s and Adolescents’ Health? Evidence From China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health/International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 22, p. 11948. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211948.
[33]. Ponzini, Arianna. (2020)Educating the New Chinese Middle-class Youth: The Role of Quality Education on Ideas of Class and Status. the Journal of Chinese Sociology, vol. 7, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-019-0113-1.
[34]. Yajie, L., Liu, H. & Gaoming, M.(2023) Widening Digital Divide: Family Investment, Digital Learning, and Educational Performance of Chinese High School Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic School Closures. Applied Research Quality Life 18, 2397-2413, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-023-10191-y
[35]. Astro Boy's Homemaker.(2017) 80% of the New Middle Class: Breaking Away from Exam-Oriented Education, We Support STEAM Education. Copyright © 2017 Sohu.com Inc. All Rights Reserved., 30 Apr. 2018, www.sohu.com/a/229994498_100134151.
[36]. Hu, Y. (2022) The Financing of Education in China. Paper commissioned for Costing and Financing SDG4-Education 2030 in the Asia-Pacific Region Project. © UNESCO 2022
[37]. China Education Daily. (2024) Overview of Work on Digital Education in China - Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, en.moe.gov.cn/features/2024WorldDigitalEducationConference/News/202402/t20240201_1113777.html.
Cite this article
Shi,J. (2024). A Comparative Study of China and U.S.: The Influence of Digital Divide on Education Inequality and Its Mitigating Policies. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,64,9-20.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).