Download pdf
The Differentiated Roles of Mega-events in Reshaping International Relations in East Asia: A Recent Decade Review
- 1 University of Toronto
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
In the past fifteen years, mega-events in East Asia have experienced a significant shift in their nature and impact on international relations. Historically seen as positive platforms for cultural exchange and regional stability, these events have increasingly become sources of conflict and geopolitical tension. This paper provides a comprehensive review and typology of mega-events, categorizing them into five types: geopolitical conflicts, crises under the Sino-American framework, ideological and propaganda issues, territorial disputes, and environmental issues. The study reveals how these events now exacerbate regional tensions and highlights the need for more nuanced and detailed research to understand their evolving roles. By examining these trends, this paper contributes to the understanding of mega-events' multifaceted impacts on the socio-political landscape of East Asia, offering insights for policymakers and scholars to navigate future regional dynamics.
Keywords
Mega-events, East Asia, International relations, Typology, Literature review
[1]. Baim, D. V., Misch, M. B., & Postlethwaite, B. E. (2024). The micro, macro, and global impact of the 2008 Summer Olympic Games on Beijing and China. The International Journal of Sport and Society, 15(1), 153-182.
[2]. Kobayashi, K., Horne, J., Cho, Y., & Lee, J. W. (Eds.). (2023). Sports Mega-Events in Asia. Palgrave Macmillan.nat
[3]. Ho, M. (2015). Occupy Congress in Taiwan: Political Opportunity, Threat, and the Sunflower Movement. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15(1), 69-97.
[4]. Shek, D. T. (2020). Protests in Hong Kong (2019–2020): A perspective based on quality of life and well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15, 619-635.
[5]. Schneider, N. (2023). Endogenous causes, risks perception and policy responses to the Fukushima disaster–political ecology comments. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 90, 103650.
[6]. Liu, X., & Hu, X. (2018). Are ‘Sister Cities’ from ‘Sister Provinces’? An exploratory study of sister city relations (SCRs) in China. Networks and Spatial Economics, 18, 473-491.
[7]. Staple, G. (1998). Jobs, crime and money: Challenges for the G8 Summit in 1998. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 2(2), 128-133.
[8]. Chai, W. (2015). Xi Jinping and Ma Ying-jeou's Historic 2015 Meeting in Singapore: An Interpretation. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 42(4), 195-202.
[9]. Park, J. H. (2021). Discourse construction of Inter-Korean summits in South Korean newspapers: A diachronic study. Language & Communication, 78, 19-34.
[10]. Agyei, S. K. (2023). Emerging markets equities’ response to geopolitical risk: Time-frequency evidence from the Russian-Ukrainian conflict era. Heliyon, 9(1), e13319.
[11]. Chen, Huring.(2014). Yu. San Francisco Contracts and South China Sea Disputes. Issues & Studies, 50(3), 169-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2015.1124630
[12]. Hurst, S. (2018). United States and the Iranian Nuclear Programme: A Critical History. Edinburgh University Press.
[13]. Zhu,F. (2017). Deterioration of the Korean nuclear issue and challenges to the security order in North-East Asia. Modern World, 2017(6), 13-17.
[14]. Yoon, J. Y., & Kim, D. S. (2022). Estimating the adverse effects of inter-unit radioactive release on operator actions at a multi-unit site. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 228, 108764.
[15]. Cecchine, G., Morgan, F. E., Wermuth, M. A., Jackson, T., & Schaefer, A. G. (2013). The US military response to the 2010 Haiti earthquake: Considerations for Army leaders. Rand Corporation.
[16]. Novella, R., & Zanuso, C. (2018). Reallocating children’s time: coping strategies after the 2010 Haiti earthquake. IZA Journal of Development and Migration, 8(1), 4.
Cite this article
Tan,Z. (2024). The Differentiated Roles of Mega-events in Reshaping International Relations in East Asia: A Recent Decade Review. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,63,49-56.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).